Table 4 Decoding threshold comparison between (IT + RS) decoding and ML decoding, for \(r_{G}=\frac {1}{2}\) (Shannon limit =0.5) and regular distribution of extra-repair symbols
From: GLDPC-Staircase AL-FEC codes: a fundamental study and new results
Decoding threshold | E | r L | Scheme A | Scheme B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ε (IT+RS) | 0 | \(\frac {1}{2}\) | 0.4380 | 0.4380 |
| Â | 1 | \(\frac {2}{3}\) | 0.3943 | 0.2709 |
| Â | 2 | 0.75 | 0.3647 | 0.2773 |
| Â | 3 | 0.8 | 0.3443 | 0.2819 |
\(\bar {\varepsilon }^{\text {\scriptsize ML}}\) | 0 | \(\frac {1}{2}\) | 0.4946 | 0.4946 |
| Â | 1 | \(\frac {2}{3}\) | 0.4993 | 0.4997 |
| Â | 2 | 0.75 | 0.4999 | 0.4999 |
| Â | 3 | 0.8 | 0.4999 | 0.4999 |