Figure 6From: Interference-Aware Radio Resource Management for Local Area Wireless NetworksUser throughput distributions in the scenario with 96 UEs and 32 BSs. The figures on the left represent OSG network and the figures on the right represent 2 CSGs network. The largest gains from IA scheduler are evident in the lower percentiles of user throughput, while there is also gain in the median throughput. The coverage of PF scheduler with two CSGs on shared band is very poor with 20% DL outage. IA scheduler is able to remedy the situation remarkably. The "PF, orth." curve represents the case of PF scheduler with the 2 CSGs on orthogonal bands, where it can be seen that just orthogonalizing the band between the 2 CSGs and running a PF scheduler is a suboptimal strategy.OSG2 CSGsBack to article page