Skip to main content

Table 1 CDF difference in dB between Monte Carlo simulations (SIM) on the one hand and CLCFM and FWBM on the other hand at 5, 50 and 90% (σ = 3, 4, 6 dB, * means greater than 3 dB).

From: SIR distribution analysis in cellular networks considering the joint impact of path-loss, shadowing and fast fading

σ(dB) η r[km] CLCF (dB) FW (dB)
3.0 2.7 0.2 0.8, 0.6, 0.3 0.8, 0.5, 0.2
3.0 2.7 0.5 0.2, 0.1, 0.1 0.2, 0.0, 0.3
3.0 2.7 0.9 0.1, 0.1, 0.4 0.2, 0.2, 0.9
3.0 3.0 0.2 2.0, 1.2, 1.3 2.0, 1.1, 1.0
3.0 3.0 0.5 0.2, 0.6, 0.6 0.2, 0.5, 0.1
3.0 3.0 0.9 0.7, 0.6, 1.1 0.7, 0.2, 0.2
3.0 3.3 0.2 2.1, 1.9, 1.5 2.1, 1.7, 1.1
3.0 3.3 0.5 0.3, 0.8, 1.3 0.2, 0.6, 0.6
3.0 3.3 0.9 1.2, 0.8, 1.6 1.2, 0.3, 0.2
3.0 3.5 0.2 2.1, 1.6, 1.6 2.1, 1.3, 1.0
3.0 3.5 0.5 0.9, 1.4, 2.0 0.9, 1.1, 1.1
3.0 3.5 0.9 0.7, 0.6, 1.6 0.7, 0.0, 0.1
4.0 2.7 0.2 0.2, 0.5, 0.4 0.1, 0.4, 0.1
4.0 2.7 0.5 1.0, 0.3, 0.1 1.1, 0.5, 0.5
4.0 2.7 0.9 0.5, 0.1, 0.0 0.4, 0.2, 0.7
4.0 3.0 0.2 1.4, 1.3, 0.6 1.4, 1.1, 0.1
4.0 3.0 0.5 0.2, 0.6, 1.3 0.3, 0.3, 0.6
4.0 3.0 0.9 0.2, 0.3, 1.3 0.3, 0.2, 0.0
4.0 3.3 0.2 1.0, 1.6, 1.9 1.0, 1.3, 1.2
4.0 3.3 0.5 1.3, 1.6, 1.8 1.2, 1.2, 0.7
4.0 3.3 0.9 0.8, 1.0, 2.6 0.7, 0.2, 0.4
4.0 3.5 0.2 1.5, 1.8, 2.5 1.5, 1.4, 1.6
4.0 3.5 0.5 2.2, 1.7, 2.6 2.1, 1.2, 1.3
4.0 3.5 0.9 0.4, 1.8, 3.0 0.3, 0.8, 0.4
6.0 2.7 0.2 0.9, 0.8, 1.0 0.8, 0.4, 0.3
6.0 2.7 0.5 0.9, 0.7, 0.5 1.0, 0.1, 0.7
6.0 2.7 0.9 0.1, 0.6, 2.2 0.1, 0.4, 0.5
6.0 3.0 0.2 2.7, 1.6, 2.4 2.6, 0.9, 0.9
6.0 3.0 0.5 1.7, 1.5, 2.7 1.5, 0.5, 0.3
6.0 3.0 0.9 1.0, 1.9, * 0.7, 0.0, 0.0
6.0 3.3 0.2 1.3, 2.8, * 1.1, 1.8, 1.5
6.0 3.3 0.5 0.6, 2.3, * 0.3, 0.8, 1.3
6.0 3.3 0.9 0.5, *, * 0.1, 0.8, 0.7
6.0 3.5 0.2 1.8, *, * 1.6, 2.0, 1.9
6.0 3.5 0.5 2.6, *, * 2.3, 1.9, 1.7
6.0 3.5 0.9 1.7, *, * 1.1, 0.7, 0.7