Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparisons between analytical and simulation results of Φ h (d)

From: Hop-distance relationship analysis with quasi-UDG model for node localization in wireless sensor networks

 

Hops

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

C ( o )

CAD

0.34

0.36

0.85

1.49

2.12

2.76

3.36

3.9

 

ω(h)

1.0

0.77

0.70

0.65

0.63

0.60

0.58

0.54

A 1 ( o )

CAD

0.42

0.38

0.86

1.52

2.13

2.69

3.31

3.98

 

CAD*

0.66

0.59

0.88

1.59

2.21

2.79

3.45

4.03

 

ω(h)

0.95

0.77

0.70

0.65

0.62

0.61

0.59

0.57

A 2 ( o )

CAD

0.35

0.49

1.17

1.76

2.33

2.89

3.40

4.05

 

CAD*

0.74

0.75

1.19

1.85

2.45

3.06

3.61

4.16

 

ω(h)

0.92

0.77

0.69

0.65

0.62

0.61

0.59

0.58