Skip to main content

Table 4 Overview second stage results

From: Column generation for frequency assignment in slow frequency hopping networks

Name Best primal Sol. Val. % of total interference
  100% 50% 150% 100% 50% 150%
Siemens1 3.17 9.83 1.37 0.66 0.30 0.93
Bradford-0-Eplus 8.34 20.78 4.33 0.06 0.04 0.07
Koeln 1.11 3.46 0.42 0.03 0.03 0.02
Swisscom 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 -
  1. Given the best available, feasible solutions from the first stage (Table3), the best solutions of the corresponding second stage. The left numbers denote the amount of induced adjacent channel interference, the right the percentage of adjacent channel interference of the total interference.