Table 2 Experiments
Experiment id | Number of clients | Channel of jammer | Jammer throughput (Mbps) | Attack intensity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Exp1_1 | 6 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp1_2 | 4 | Main | 5 | High |
Exp1_3 | 2 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp2_1 | 6 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp2_2 | 4 | Main | 3 | Medium |
Exp2_3 | 2 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp3_1 | 6 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp3_2 | 4 | Main | 1.5 | Low |
Exp3_3 | 2 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp4_1 | 6 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp4_2 | 4 | Immediately adjacent | 5 | High |
Exp4_3 | 2 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp5_1 | 6 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp5_2 | 4 | Immediately adjacent | 3 | Medium |
Exp5_3 | 2 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp6_1 | 6 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp6_2 | 4 | Immediately adjacent | 1.5 | Low |
Exp6_3 | 2 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp7_1 | 6 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp7_2 | 4 | Next adjacent | 5 | High |
Exp7_3 | 2 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp8_1 | 6 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp8_2 | 4 | Next adjacent | 3 | Medium |
Exp8_3 | 2 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp9_1 | 6 | Â | Â | Â |
Exp9_2 | 4 | Next adjacent | 1.5 | Low |
Exp9_3 | 2 | Â | Â | Â |