Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Comparison of SM X , P UX , P X (A) vs. TS (B) and comparison of SC X , P UX , P X (A) vs. TS SM X , P UX , P X (C)

From: Achievable rates optimization for broadcast channels using finite size constellations under transmission constraints

M SNR1 SNR2 MG R 1 (A|B) MG R 1 (A|C)
   8 6.13% 6.72%
4   6 11.14% 11.65%
  10 4 18.50% 16.69%
   2 28.43% 18.9%
   0 40.70% 23.54%
   14 7.80 % ( M 1 = 2 , M 2 = 4 ) 7.89%
8 16 12 13.60 % ( M 1 = 2 , M 2 = 4 ) 11.43%
   10 21.15 % ( M 1 = 2 , M 2 = 4 ) 14.96%
   8 30.21 % ( M 1 = 2 , M 2 = 4 ) 14.71%
   16 10.36 % ( M 1 = 2 , M 2 = 8 ) 2.96%
16 18 14 16.42 % ( M 1 = 4 , M 2 = 4 ) 2.94%
   12 24.68 % ( M 1 = 4 , M 2 = 4 ) 5.29%
   10 35.08 % ( M 1 = 4 , M 2 = 4 ) 4.80%