Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of SC X , P UX , P X and SM X , P UX , P X M 2 -PAM/ M 1 -PAM w.r.t MG R 2 (%)

From: Achievable rates optimization for broadcast channels using finite size constellations under transmission constraints

d2/d1

SNR2

MG R 2

M2/M1

1.2589

16

4.9416

8/2

1.4125

15

20.1521

4/4

1.5849

14

12.7522

4/4

1.7783

13

8.2192

4/4

1.9953

12

7.4536

4/4

2.2387

11

41.4993

2/8

2.5119

10

30.8293

2/8

2.8184

9

22.9121

2/8

3.1623

8

16.7443

2/8

3.5481

7

12.6033

2/8

3.9811

6

10.5427

2/8

4.4668

5

10.3343

2/8

5.0119

4

11.7414

2/8

5.6234

3

16.0961

2/8

6.3096

2

22.8535

2/8

7.0795

1

32.6194

2/8