Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Comparison of SC X , P UX , P X and SM X , P UX , P X M 2 -PAM/ M 1 -PAM w.r.t MG R 2 (%)

From: Achievable rates optimization for broadcast channels using finite size constellations under transmission constraints

d2/d1 SNR2 MG R 2 M2/M1
1.2589 16 4.9416 8/2
1.4125 15 20.1521 4/4
1.5849 14 12.7522 4/4
1.7783 13 8.2192 4/4
1.9953 12 7.4536 4/4
2.2387 11 41.4993 2/8
2.5119 10 30.8293 2/8
2.8184 9 22.9121 2/8
3.1623 8 16.7443 2/8
3.5481 7 12.6033 2/8
3.9811 6 10.5427 2/8
4.4668 5 10.3343 2/8
5.0119 4 11.7414 2/8
5.6234 3 16.0961 2/8
6.3096 2 22.8535 2/8
7.0795 1 32.6194 2/8