 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Performance evaluation of maxd_{min} precoding in impulsive noise for traintowayside communications in subway tunnels
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networkingvolume 2014, Article number: 83 (2014)
Abstract
This paper addresses the performance evaluation of the multiple input multiple output (MIMO) precoding technique, referred to as maxd_{min} precoding, over fading channel with impulsive noise in a railway tunnel. Measurements showed that the received signal at the antenna on the moving train roof near the catenary suffers from electromagnetic noise interference (EMI). This implies that the traditional Gaussian noise model is no longer valid and an impulsive noise model has to be considered. Based on this observation, we investigate the performance of the maxd_{min} MIMO precoding technique, based on the minimum distance criterion, in an impulsive noise modeled as an αstable distribution. The main contributions are (i) a general approximation of the error probability of the maxd_{min} precoder, in the presence of Cauchy noise for an n_{ r }×n_{ t } MIMO system, and (ii) the performance evaluation, in terms of bit error rate, of a complete communication system, considering a MIMO channel model in tunnel and impulsive noise, both obtained by measurements. Two soft detection techniques, providing the soft decisions to the channel decoder, are proposed based on the approximation of the probability density function of the impulsive noise by either a Gaussian or a Cauchy law.
1 Introduction
Spatial diversity offered by multiple input multiple output (MIMO) techniques can help to provide efficient transmissions in underground tunnels [1]. In the field of public transport, particularly in subway tunnels, MIMO techniques can improve the system performance in terms of data rate, robustness, and availability [1]. Moreover, when the channel state information at the transmitter (CSIT) is known, precoding techniques permit to compensate the channel impairments such as spatial correlation between antennas and can improve the overall performance drastically, particularly in confined environments [1]. Indeed, precoding is a processing technique that exploits CSIT by operating on the signal before transmission. MIMO precoding typically makes use of singular value decomposition (SVD) to convert the MIMO channel, represented by a full matrix, into parallel subchannels, without any interference. MIMO precoding is of great practical interest in wireless communication and remains an active research area, fueled by applications in commercial wireless technology.
In this paper, we consider a closedloop MIMO precoder based on the maximization of the minimal distance, referred to as maxd_{min} precoder. Indeed, the maxd_{min} precoder outperforms other kinds of MIMO precoders in terms of bit error rate (BER) performance, particularly in correlated propagation scenarios [2–4]. Moreover, it provides a high spectral efficiency compared to the single antenna scheme. In general, the analyses of MIMO system performance so far have been performed assuming an ideal Gaussian noise model. However, this model is not representative of real environments in railway systems, where impulsive noise can be identified. Several models of impulsive noise have been proposed in the literature: mixtures of Gaussian [5, 6], the generalized Gaussian [7], the generalized t distribution [8], the distributions of Middleton [9, 10], and the αstable laws [11, 12]. The effects of these impulsive noise distributions on OFDM systems and power line communications have been largely investigated [13, 14]. In [15], the authors considered the effect of a mixture of Gaussian noise and impulsive noise (αstable distribution) on typical single input single output (SISO) techniques. Some more recent works on MIMO systems also considered impulsive noise distributions. In [16], the performance analysis of three typical MIMO systems  zero forcing (ZF) system, maximum likelihood (ML) system, and spacetime block coding (STBC) system  was performed in a mixture of Gaussian noise and impulsive noise. The upper bound of symbol error rate (SER) in this mixed noise was derived for each system. In [17], authors analyzed the symmetric αstable (S α S) noise component after performing ZF filtering in the receiver and deduced a probability density function (pdf) approximation of the S α S noise component by using CauchyGaussian mixture with biparameter model. Based on this approximated pdf, they provided a closedform expression of the BER performance in MIMO systems. Nevertheless, none of those works has considered MIMO precoding.
In this paper, we focus on the maxd_{min} MIMO precoder in the presence of a specific impulsive noise, whose model was obtained thanks to measurements on the antenna dedicated to Global System for Mobile CommunicationsRailways (GSMR) situated on the roof of a running train. The measurement campaigns were carried out on trains running at a speed between 160 and 200 km/h. They showed that an intermittent source of electromagnetic interference (EMI) is received by the GSMR antennas [18]. The EMI is generated by the electric arc emissions due to the sliding contact between the catenary and the pantograph. The variables that influence the electric arc emissions are the contact wire surface conditions, the pantograph sliding contact conditions, the temperature, the train speed, the amplitude of the collected current, the mechanical suspensions reaction, and in general the mechanical characteristics of the catenary system [19]. The noise distribution measured in [18] is well approximated by a S α S distribution [20].
The contributions of the paper are as follows:

(i)
We present a new approximation of the error probability of the maxd _{min} precoder, in the presence of Cauchy noise. This approximation is available for any number of antennas and any rectangular quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) modulation order. This is an extension of our previous work only valid for 2×2 MIMO system and 4QAM modulation [21], using the pdf statistic of minimum Euclidean distance of the received constellation of a precoded MIMO system with rectangular QAM modulations.

(ii)
We apply our precoded MIMO solution on a practical transmission in a tunnel. The transmission involves a realistic channel model in tunnel, including impulsive noise and MIMO channel, both based on measurements and a communication system close to WiFi technology, including a channel code. Since the channel decoder has to be fed with soft decisions by the MIMO detector, two soft detection techniques are proposed, based on the approximation of the probability density function of the impulsive noise by either a Gaussian or a Cauchy law.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. After describing the system model with S α S noise in Section 2, Section 3 details the error probability analysis of the maxd_{min} precoder assuming full channel state information (CSI) at the receiver side and perfect channel estimation in a theoretical Rayleigh channel. Section 4 highlights practical performance results considering a MIMO channel measured in a real tunnel environment. Conclusions and perspectives are presented in Section 5.
Throughout the paper, boldface characters are used for matrices (upper case) and vectors (lower case). Superscript (·)^{∗} denotes conjugate transposition. I_{ M } stands for the M×M identity matrix. ∥·∥_{2} and ∥·∥_{ F } indicate the twonorm and the Frobenius norm of a matrix, respectively. ${\u2102}^{m}$ is the mdimensional complex vector space, ${\mathcal{N}}_{c}\left(0,{\sigma}^{2}\right)$ is the complex normal distribution. λ is the wavelength.
2 System model
We consider the case of a singleuser transmission from n_{ t } transmit antennas to n_{ r } receive antennas over a fading channel. We assume that the channel coefficients are known at the receiver and at the transmitter. The amount of information sent from the receiver to the transmitter can be reduced by using partial or quantized CSI [4, 22]. In this case, the receiver chooses the precoding matrix from a finite cardinality codebook, designed offline and known at both sides of the communication link. Since the quantization is a standalone problem, in this paper, we focus on full CSIT. Thus, the general inputoutput relation of the precoded MIMO scheme is given by
where y is the complex received symbol vector, x is the complex transmitted symbol vector of b streams such that b≤ min(n_{ t },n_{ r }) and E=[x x^{∗}], F is the linear precoder respecting $\parallel \mathbf{F}{\parallel}_{F}^{2}={E}_{t}$ where E_{ t } is the total transmit energy, $\mathbf{n}\in {\u2102}^{{n}_{r}\times 1}$ is a complex S α S noise vector, and $\mathbf{H}\in {\u2102}^{{n}_{r}\times {n}_{t}}$ is the Rayleigh decorrelated channel matrix. In Section 4, H will be described by a Kronecker model to account for the spatial correlation measured in the tunnel.
2.1 Impulsive noise: αstable distribution
αstable random processes provide a suitable model for a wide range of nonGaussian heavytailed impulsive noise encountered in wireless communication channels [12]. This can be justified by the generalized central limit theorem considering that the noise results from a large number of possible impulsive effects [11]. However, there is no closedform expression of their pdf and cumulative distribution except for the Gaussian (α=2), Cauchy (α=1), and Levy distributions (α=1/2 and β=1). They are generally described by their characteristic function
where α∈]0,2] is the characteristic exponent. It measures the tail heaviness of the distribution. The more α tends to 0, the slower the tail decreases and vice versa. γ>0 is the dispersion or scale parameter. γ is similar to the variance of the Gaussian distribution. $\mu \in \mathbb{R}$ is the localization parameter. β∈[−1,1] is the symmetry parameter. When β=0, the distribution is symmetric about μ, denoted S α S, and Equation 2 is reduced to
The probability density function may be numerically calculated using the inverse Fourier transform of Equation 2 or 3. In [20], a distribution fitting of the measured transient EMI acting on GSMR antenna on the train roof revealed that the measured data in [18] is well modeled by the S α S distribution. Table 1 gives the parameter values of the distribution, estimated by [20].
2.2 Closedloop MIMO precoding technique
We consider the maxd_{min} precoder, based on the maximization of the minimum Euclidean distance of the received constellation [20]. By performing the singular value decomposition (SVD) of the channel matrix H, F_{ v } and G_{ v } can be obtained, where H_{ v }=G_{ v }H F_{ v }=diag(σ_{1},⋯,σ_{ b }). H_{ v } is the virtual channel matrix, whose elements represent subchannel gains arranged in a descending order. The precoding and decoding matrix can respectively be written as F=F_{ v }F_{ d } and G=G_{ d }G_{ v }. By applying the precoding and the decoding matrix at the transmitter and at the receiver, respectively, the received vector of the precodingbased MIMO scheme is given by
The max d_{min} precoder solution is given by
In [2], an analytic solution of Equation 5 is given for two independent data streams, b=2 and a 4QAM. Thanks to a judicious change of variables, the virtual channel matrix can be parameterized as
where $\theta =arctan\left(\frac{{\sigma}_{2}}{{\sigma}_{1}}\right)$ is the channel angle and $\rho =\sqrt{{\sigma}_{1}^{2}+{\sigma}_{2}^{2}}$ is the channel gain. The solution does not depend on the signaltonoise ratio (SNR) but rather on the value of the channel angle θ and can take two different forms. The optimized solution for MIMO systems using highorder QAM modulation is hard to find. However, a general form of minimum Euclidean distance based precoders for all rectangular QAM modulations was proposed in [23]. This form is based on two linear precoders, which maximize the Euclidean distance d_{min} for the two independent data streams according to the following rule: pouring power only on the strongest subchannel or on both subchannels according to the value of the channel angle θ in comparison to θ_{0}. The threshold θ_{0}(M) depends on the modulation level and is defined by
The corresponding minimal Euclidean distance for these two precoders, referred to as F_{r 1} and F_{octa}, is given in Table 2[23]. Suboptimal extensions for substream number greater than 2 can be found in [3].
2.3 Detection techniques
The lack of analytical form of the probability density makes it difficult to study detection techniques in the presence of impulsive noise. For SISO systems, some good approximations of probability density of the S α S noise as a mixture of noise have been proposed in [15]. However, the maximum likelihood (ML) detection in the general case of S α S noise is difficult to solve for the precoded MIMO scheme. In this study, we will consider a suboptimal detection technique, based on the assumption of a Cauchy detector [24]. This assumption is justified since the estimated error exponent of the considered S α S distribution (Table 1) is close to that of the Cauchy distribution.
The optimal decoding rule is to find $\hat{\mathbf{x}}$ that maximizes the likelihood
If n follows a Cauchy distribution, the rule of maximum likelihood is then given by
In the following section we analyze the error probability of the precoded MIMO scheme in the presence of Cauchy noise (α=1) [24].
3 Error probability analysis
Equation 6 shows that the virtual channel is fully characterized by two variables ρ and θ which are the channel gain and the channel angle, respectively. The behavior and performance of the maxd_{min} precoder depend on these two parameters. Furthermore, ρ and θ are random variables (RV) whose laws depend on the channel. Thus, in this section, we focus on the theoretical laws of these two RV, and especially θ, whose pdf depends directly on the distribution of the two largest eigenvalues of the channel. The main idea is to derive the expression of pdf of the minimum Euclidean distance and then the error probability of the maxd_{min} precoder. As the channel matrix H is an uncorrelated Rayleigh matrix, W = H H^{∗} is a Wishart matrix. Using the random matrix theory, we can define the joint distribution of nonzero eigenvalues of a Wishart matrix for min(n_{ t },n_{ r })=m[25].
where
In the maxd_{min} precoder case, we are interested only in the two largest eigenvalues. Thus, the conjoint law of these two largest eigenvalues is expressed by
A general form is difficult to obtain, but it can be demonstrated that the conjoint law has the form [26]
where coefficients p_{n,i,j} are computed by any mathematical computational software program. In order to find the pdf of the square minimum Euclidian distance for the maxd_{min} precoder, ${\text{pdf}}_{\text{max}{d}_{\text{min}}}$, we consider a second change of variables based on a more tractable couple of RV:
Thus, the square minimum Euclidian distance can be written as [26] in a simplest form:
with
where δ is a function of β and α_{ M } is a constant depending on the modulation size. The expression of the minimum distance takes into account the two possibilities F_{r 1} and F_{octa}. In (14), the determination of the pdf of the square minimum distance requires the computation of the marginal law of Γ δ from the joint law of Γ and δ. Finally, the pdf of the square minimum distance in the case of the maxd_{min} precoder is
where
Only the main results are reminded here, and the reader may find more detailed calculus in [26]. The minimum Euclidean distance directly affects the error probability at the output of the ML detector. The closer the two impacts of the received constellation are, the higher the error probability is. Therefore, we use the theoretical error probability approximation, limited to the nearest neighbors as in [25]: considering an impact of the received constellation, the error only comes from the choice of one neighbor at the distance d_{min}. In order to take into account the channel statistics, the expression is averaged by using the integration weighted by the pdf of d_{min}. Figure 1 shows different examples of results for the Gaussian noise. The proposed formula is a good lower bound and a close approximation at high SNR for the Gaussian noise. The Cauchy receiver, which is the optimum in the case of α=1, performs quite closely to the optimum receiver for a wide range of α and γ[27]. Thus, we suggest using the same method as in [25] applied to the Cauchy law. First, we approximate the pdf of the measured S α S noise by a Cauchy law given by
Then, we deduce the complementary cumulative distribution function (ccdf) of the Cauchy noise by
where F(x) is the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the Cauchy distribution. Finally, the ccdf of the Cauchy noise, which is analog to erfc function for the Gaussian case, is averaged over the statistics of the minimum distance considering a decorrelated Rayleigh channel, and the BER expression of the maxd_{min} precoder is provided:
where
N_{ e }(θ) represents the average number of nearest neighbors at the distance d_{min}, and N_{ b }(θ) is the average number of errors among the b transmitted bits per symbol. These two parameters can be obtained using the received constellations and depend on the modulation and the maxd_{min} precoder (F_{r 1} or F_{octa}). Table 3 presents the results in the special case where b=2, and 4 bits is transmitted using MQAM modulations. The exact analytical solution of equality 21 is hard to find due to the difficulty to deal with the integration. So, we manage it by numerical integration. We compare these results with the simulation of the whole communication chain in a Rayleigh channel. Simulation parameters are presented in Table 4. G_{ d } is chosen as an identity matrix, and n_{ v } is a Cauchy noise in this stage. There are several algorithms to simulate stable αrandom variables [28]. In particular, for X a Cauchy random variable, we generate a uniform random variable $U\in \left]\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2}\right[$, and then we apply the relationship [28]:
Figure 2 provides the theoretical and the simulated BER versus the SNR ratio for a 2×2 MIMO system with different modulation order in the presence of an impulsive noise modeled by the Cauchy law. By comparing the theoretical results (line with plus sign) and the simulation results (line with circle), we can readily find that the theoretical results match the simulated results of the communication chain very well at high SNR values (>20 dB or BER <10^{−2}) for 4QAM and 16QAM modulations. In these cases, the agreement is not so good for the low SNR values. For the 64QAM modulation, the gap between theoretical and the simulated results is about 3 dB. This demonstrates the interest of the proposed closedform BER performance only at high SNR. It may be considered as a good lower bound for 2×2 MIMO systems in the presence of impulsive noise. In Figures 3, 4, and 5, we show the performance analysis of 4×4 and 8×8 MIMO systems for 4QAM, 16QAM, and 64QAM, respectively. By comparing the theoretical results (line with plus sign) and the simulation results (line with circle), we can readily find that the theoretical results match the simulated results of the communication chain very well at high SNR values (>30 dB or BER <10^{−4}) for 4QAM and 16QAM modulations. For higher modulation, we have to improve our BER approximation by considering more neighbors. With 4QAM modulation, the 4×4 system provides a high gain at high SNR value compared to the 2×2 system, more than 20 dB at BER = 10^{−5}. However, there is no significant gain when we consider a 8×8 system compared to the 4×4 system with the same modulation order. This approximation may be considered as a good lower bound for any MIMO system in the presence of impulsive noise.
4 Performance in a real tunnel environment
4.1 Realistic model from measured MIMO channels
The considered transmission chain mimics an IEEE 802.11 × PHY modem that involves a bitinterleaved coded modulation (BICM) resulting in the concatenation of a channel encoder, a bit interleaver, and a bittosymbol mapper. The channel code is a $\frac{1}{2}$ rate convolutional code with constraint length K=7 and defined by the generator polynomials g_{0}=0133 and g_{1}=0171. The frame of encoded data is then randomly interleaved and converted to complex symbols belonging to the constellation alphabet of 4QAM modulation. This BICM scheme is followed by the maxd_{min} precoder, which adapts b=2 streams to the 4×4 MIMO channel. Decoding is performed using a soft detection technique considering two different laws: Gaussian and Cauchy (see Section 4.2). For this simulation, 10,000 frames of 800 bits each were transmitted. The channel is quasistatic, so H is assumed constant over the transmission of several consecutive vector symbols. The considered noise is S α S, and the generation of S α S random variables follows the formula proposed by [25].
A MIMO channel sounding campaign provided the channel matrices H, thanks to the measured complex impulse responses between each couple of transmitting and receiving antennas [29]. Measurements were conducted in the Tunnel of Roux located in the Ardèche region in the south of France. We used the Propsound^{TM} channel sounder from the Elektrobit company (Oulu, Finland) [30] which is based on the spreadspectrum sounding method for the delay domain. It is a multidimensional channel sounder which measures radio channel in time and spatial domains, and provides complex impulse responses (CIR). The rapid switching of the antennas makes Propsound^{TM} suitable for MIMO measurements. Measurement configurations and first analyses are presented in [29]. Due to the small RMS delay spread in this environment (few ns) regarding the data frame size, the channel matrices H are modeled in narrow band using the Kronecker model [31] as indicated in (24):
where ${\mathbf{H}}_{w}\in {\u2102}^{{n}_{r}\times {n}_{t}}$ is the i.i.d. Rayleigh matrix, and ${\mathbf{\Sigma}}_{t}\in {\u2102}^{{n}_{t}\times {n}_{t}}$ and ${\mathbf{\Sigma}}_{r}\in {\u2102}^{{n}_{r}\times {n}_{r}}$ represent the correlation matrices averaged along the tunnel axis at the transmitter and receiver sides, respectively, computed from H. The measurements of the MIMO channel were conducted in the Tunnel of Roux (Ardèche region in the south of France, Figure 6). Two MIMO configurations related to the spacing between the receiving and transmitting antennas, 2λ (average value of correlation along the tunnel ρ=0.96) and 10λ (average value of correlation ρ=0.57), are considered. They correspond to a high and a low correlation scenario, respectively [29]. In such an environment (empty tunnel, no crosssectional change), there is a geometrical similarity between the environment near the transmitting antennas and that near the receiving antennas. So, the correlation values are equivalent at both sides. All antennas at transmission and reception sides are vertically polarized. In the rest of the paper, we will consider only the low correlation configuration
4.2 Soft detection technique
Since channel coding is considered in the communication chain, loglikelihood ratios (LLRs) have to be provided to the channel decoder. For each MIMO received vector y and assuming a Gaussian noise, LLRs are given by
Assuming a Cauchy noise, LLRs are given by
4.3 Simulation results and discussion
Figure 7 corresponds to the maxd_{min} BER performance in the measured 4×4 MIMO channel obtained in the low correlated scenario (antenna spacing equal to 10λ and ρ=0.57). In this figure, we present the comparison between the two different soft detection techniques for the maxd_{min} precoder. It can be seen that the detector with the Gaussian assumption gives poor performance, compared to the detector with the Cauchy assumption. For a BER of 10^{−2}, the gap between these two detectors is greater than 6 dB. Therefore, the channel decoder based on LLRs obtained, thanks to the Cauchy assumption, can increase the performance potential of the communication system in this type of railway environment.
5 Conclusion
In this paper, we have investigated the performance, in terms of BER, of a precoded MIMO system, based on the maxd_{min} precoder, in the presence of impulsive noise in the railway environment. First, we have proposed a lower bound on the error probability of the maxd_{min} precoder in a Cauchy noise environment for any MIMO system dimensions and MQAM rectangular modulation, which is tight at high SNR relative to the simulation results of the communication chain. The expression is validated by the Monte Carlo evaluation of the minimum distance and the full simulation of the communication chain. The chosen approximation is simple and more accurate, but a more complex form may be found by taking into account all neighbors. Second, we have evaluated the performance of a realistic communication system close to the WiFi PHY layer, including a realistic tunnel channel, based on previous MIMO channel sounding measurements and S α S parameter values derived from distribution fitting of measured transient EMI received at the GSMR antenna on the roof of the train. These transient EMI are due to bad sliding contacts between the catenary and the pantograph. The loglikelihood ratios, needed at the input of the channel decoder, have been expressed in a Cauchy noise for the MIMO system. We have shown that the soft channel decoder based on those loglikelihood ratios behaves remarkably well in the studied tunnel context, even if S α S impulsive noise is considered.
Research is also underway to provide an approximation in correlated channels and improve the detection technique in other MIMO configurations.
References
 1.
Cocheril Y, Langlais C, Berbineau M, Moniak G: Advantages of simple MIMO schemes for robust or high data rate transmission systems in underground tunnels. In IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2008Fall. Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 21–24 September 2008:15. doi:10.1109/VETECF.2008.82
 2.
Collin L, Berder O, Rostaing P, Burel G: Optimal minimum distancebased precoder for MIMO spatial multiplexing systems. Signal Process. IEEE Trans 2004, 52(3):617627. doi:10.1109/TSP.2003.822365 10.1109/TSP.2003.822365
 3.
Vrigneau B, Letessier J, Rostaing P, Collin L, Burel G: Extension of the MIMO precoder based on the minimum euclidean distance: a crossform matrix. Selected Top. Signal Process. IEEE J 2008, 2(2):135146. doi:10.1109/JSTSP.2008.922476
 4.
Kwadjane JM, Vrigneau B, Cocheril Y, Langlais C, Berbineau M: Limited feedback precoding performance analysis for traintowayside communications in subway tunnels. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC). Budapest, Hungary; 9–13 June 2013:500504. doi:10.1109/ICCW.2013.6649285
 5.
Huber PJ: Robust Statistics. New York: Wiley; 1981.
 6.
Miller JH, Thomas JB: The detection of signals in impulsive noise modeled as a mixture process. Commun. IEEE Trans 1976, 24(5):559563. doi:10.1109/TCOM.1976.1093331 10.1109/TCOM.1976.1093331
 7.
Miller J, Thomas JB: Detectors for discretetime signals in nonGaussian noise. Inf. Theory IEEE Trans 1972, 18(2):241250. doi:10.1109/TIT.1972.1054787 10.1109/TIT.1972.1054787
 8.
Hall HM: A new model for impulsive phenomena: application to atmosphericnoise communication channels. Technical Report 34128 and 70507, Stanford University, Stanford Electronics Laboratories (1966)
 9.
Middleton D: Statisticalphysical models of electromagnetic interference. Electromagn. Compatibility IEEE Trans 1977, EMC19(3):106127. doi:10.1109/TEMC.1977.303527
 10.
Middleton D: NonGaussian noise models in signal processing for telecommunications: new methods an results for class A and class B noise models. Inf. Theory IEEE Trans 1999, 45(4):11291149. doi:10.1109/18.761256 10.1109/18.761256
 11.
Samorodnitsky G, Taqqu M: Stable NonGaussian Random Processes. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1994.
 12.
Nikias C, Shao M: Signal Processing With AlphaStable Distributions and Applications. New York: Wiley; 1995.
 13.
Zhidkov SV: Analysis and comparison of several simple impulsive noise mitigation schemes for OFDM receivers. Commun. IEEE Trans 2008, 56(1):59. doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2008.050391
 14.
Zimmermann M, Dostert K: Analysis and modeling of impulsive noise in broadband powerline communications. Electromagn. Compatibility, IEEE Trans 2002, 44(1):249258. doi:10.1109/15.990732 10.1109/15.990732
 15.
Kuruoglu E: Signal processing in alphastable noise environments: a least lpnorm approach. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1998
 16.
Li A, Wang Y, Xu W, Zhou Z: Performance evaluation of MIMO systems in a mixture of Gaussian noise and impulsive noise. In The 2004 Joint Conference of the 10th AsiaPacific Conference on Communications, 2004 and the 5th International Symposium on MultiDimensional Mobile Communications Proceedings, vol. 1. Beijing, China; August–September 2004:2922961. doi:10.1109/APCC.2004.1391700
 17.
Fan L, Lei X, Gao F: Closedform BER analysis of MIMO systems with impulsive noise using biparameter CauchyGaussian mixture approximation. In 2010 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP). Suzhou, China; 21–23 October 2010:15. doi:10.1109/WCSP.2010.5633500
 18.
Slimen NB, Deniau V, Rioult J, Dudoyer S, Baranowski S: Statistical characterisation of the EM interferences acting on GSMR antennas fixed above moving trains. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys 2009, 48(2):212027. 10.1051/epjap/2009155
 19.
Boschetti AG, Mariscotti A, Deniau V: Pantograph arc transients occurrence and GSMR characteristics. In 18th Symposium International Measurement Confederation Technical Committees 4 (IMEKO TC4). Natal, Brazil; 27–30 September 2011.
 20.
Hassan K: Contributions to cognitive radio awareness for high mobility applications. PhD thesis, Universite de Valenciennes et du HainautCambresis, 2012
 21.
Kwadjane JM, Vrigneau B, Langlais C, Cocheril Y, Berbineau M: Performance of the maxdmin precoder in impulsive noise for railway communications in tunnels. In 2013 13th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (ITST). Tampere, Finland; 5–7 November 2013:390395. doi:10.1109/ITST.2013.6685578
 22.
Letessier J, Vrigneau B, Rostaing P, Burel G: Limited feedback unitary matrix applied to MIMO dminbased precoder. In Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2006. ACSSC ’06. Carlifonia, USA; 29 October–1 November 2006:15311535. doi:10.1109/ACSSC.2006.355014
 23.
Ngo Q, Berder O, Scalart P: Minimum Euclidean distance based precoders for MIMO systems using rectangular QAM modulations. Signal Process. IEEE Trans 2012, 60(3):15271533. doi:10.1109/TSP.2011.2177972
 24.
Kay SM: Fundamentals for Statistical Signal Processing : Detection Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1998.
 25.
Vrigneau B, Letessier J, Rostaing P, Collin L, Burel G: Theoretical results about MIMO minimal distance precoder and performances comparison. IEICE Trans. Commun 2008, 13: 821828.
 26.
Oyedapo OJ, Vrigneau B, Vauzelle R: Performance analysis of closedloop MIMO precoder based on the probability of minimum distance. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun 2014. in press
 27.
Tsihrintzis GA, Nikias CL: Performance of optimum and suboptimum receivers in the presence of impulsive noise modeled as an alphastable process. Commun. IEEE Trans 1995, 43(2/3/4):904914. doi:10.1109/26.380123
 28.
Nolan JP: Stable Distributions models for heavy tailed data. . Accessed 3 November 2013 http://academic2.american.edu/~jpnolan/stable/chap1.pdf
 29.
Masson E, Cocheril Y, Berbineau M, Ghys J, Kyrolainen J, Hovinen V: 4 × 4 MIMO channel sounding in tunnels for traintowayside communications. In 2012 International Conference on Wireless Communications in Unusual and Confined Areas (ICWCUCA). ClermontFerrand, France; 28–30 August 2012:15. doi:10.1109/ICWCUCA.2012.6402480
 30.
Hentilä L, Kyösti P, Ylitalo J, Zhao J, Meinilä X, Nuutinen JP: Experimental characterization of multidimensional parameters at 2.45 and 5.25 GHz indoor channels. In Conference on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC). Aalborg, Denmark; 18–22 September 2005:1627.
 31.
Chuah CN, Tse DNC, Kahn JM, Valenzuela RA: Capacity scaling in MIMO wireless systems under correlated fading. Inf. Theory IEEE Trans 2002, 48(3):637650. doi:10.1109/18.985982 10.1109/18.985982
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by IFSTTAR, the French project CORRIDOR (COgnitive Radio for RaIlway through Dynamic and Opportunistic spectrum Reuse) funded by ANR and the regional CISIT (Campus International Sécurité et Intermodalité des Transports) program funded by the North Region in France and the European Commission via the FEDER.
Author information
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 MIMO systems
 Closed loop
 Precoding techniques
 Impulsive noise
 αstable distribution; Channel correlation; Tunnel environments; Minimal distance density function