Scaling of wireless sensor network intrusion detection probability: 3D sensors, 3D intruders, and 3D environments

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Table 2 Results summarization and final recommendation

Distribution	WSN efficiency evaluation		Intruder detection evaluation		Final recommendation
Gaussian	Control data size	HP
	Number of hops	HP	Without considering distant	HP
	Packet loss HP
	End-to-end delay	LPR2
	Throughput	HP	With considering distant	HP
	General efficiency	HP
Uniform	Control data size	LPR2			Using Gaussian
	Number of hops	LPR2	Without considering distant	LPR2	to distribute the
	Packet loss	LPR2			sensors in WSN
	End-to-end delay	HP			gives the best
	Throughput	LPR2	With considering distant	LPR2	performance as
	General efficiency	LPR2			regards intruder detection
Beta	Control data size	LPR3			probability and overall
	Number of hops	LPR3	Without considering distant	LPR3	WSN efficiency,
	Packet loss	LPR3			then uniform, beta,
	End-to-end delay	LPR3			and chi-square
	Throughput	LPR3	With considering distant	LPR3
	General efficiency	LP
Chi-square	Control data size	LP
	Number of hops	LP	Without considering distant	LP
	Packet loss	LP
	End-to-end delay	LP
	Throughput	LP	With considering distant	LP
	General efficiency	LP

HP: highest performance. LPR2: lower performance-rank2. LPR3: lower performance-rank3. LP: lowest performance.