Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison for E-TM at 6.5-dB PAPR

From: Experimental analysis of PAPR reduction technique using hybrid peak windowing in LTE system

E-TM HPW CAF [7] PW [8]
E-TM 1.1 63.6 dBc 61.9 dBc 62.3 dBc
E-TM 1.2 63.5 dBc 62.1 dBc 62.2 dBc
E-TM 2 0.8% 1.7% 1.4%
E-TM 3.1 5.8% 7.3% 6.8%
E-TM 3.2 4.2% 4.7% 4.8%
7.8% 8.5% 8.4%
E-TM 3.3 10.7% 11.4% 11.2%
4.2% 4.7% 4.6%