Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison for E-TM at 6.5-dB PAPR

From: Experimental analysis of PAPR reduction technique using hybrid peak windowing in LTE system

E-TM

HPW

CAF [7]

PW [8]

E-TM 1.1

63.6 dBc

61.9 dBc

62.3 dBc

E-TM 1.2

63.5 dBc

62.1 dBc

62.2 dBc

E-TM 2

0.8%

1.7%

1.4%

E-TM 3.1

5.8%

7.3%

6.8%

E-TM 3.2

4.2%

4.7%

4.8%

7.8%

8.5%

8.4%

E-TM 3.3

10.7%

11.4%

11.2%

4.2%

4.7%

4.6%