Table 5 Decoding threshold comparison between (IT + RS) decoding and ML decoding, for \(r_{G}=\frac {1}{2}\) (Shannon limit =0.5) and irregular uniform distribution of extra-repair symbols
From: GLDPC-Staircase AL-FEC codes: a fundamental study and new results
Decoding threshold | f(%) | r L | Scheme A | Scheme B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ε (IT+RS) | [0] | \(\frac {1}{2}\) | 0.4380 | 0.4380 |
[25 50 25] | \(\frac {2}{3}\) | 0.4064 | 0.3029 | |
[0 50 25 0 25] | 0.75 | 0.3874 | 0.3089 | |
[5 10 15 20 50] | 0.8 | 0.3589 | 0.3007 | |
\(\bar {\varepsilon }^{\text {\scriptsize ML}}\) | [0] | \(\frac {1}{2}\) | 0.4946 | 0.4946 |
[25 50 25] | \(\frac {2}{3}\) | 0.4993 | 0.4997 | |
[0 50 25 0 25] | 0.75 | 0.4998 | 0.4998 | |
[5 10 15 20 50] | 0.8 | 0.4998 | 0.4998 |