Table 6 Decoding threshold comparison between (IT + RS) decoding and ML decoding for different values of r G with \(r_{L}=\frac {2}{3}\) and regular distribution of extra-repair symbols
From: GLDPC-Staircase AL-FEC codes: a fundamental study and new results
Decoding threshold | r G | E | Scheme A | Scheme B | Shannon limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ε (IT+RS) | \(\frac {2}{3}\) | E=0 | 0.2709 | 0.2709 | 0.3333 |
\(\frac {1}{2}\) | E=1 | 0.3943 | 0.2709 | 0.5 | |
\(\frac {2}{5}\) | E=2 | 0.4744 | 0.3639 | 0.6 | |
\(\frac {1}{3}\) | E=3 | 0.5332 | 0.4394 | 0.6667 | |
\(\bar {\varepsilon }^{\text {\scriptsize ML}}\) | \(\frac {2}{3}\) | E=0 | 0.3301 | 0.3301 | 0.3333 |
\(\frac {1}{2}\) | E=1 | 0.4993 | 0.4997 | 0.5 | |
\(\frac {2}{5}\) | E=2 | 0.5998 | 0.5999 | 0.6 | |
\(\frac {1}{3}\) | E=3 | 0.6666 | 0.6666 | 0.6667 |