Skip to main content

Table 7 Decoding threshold comparison between (IT + RS) decoding and ML decoding for different values of r G with \(r_{L}=\frac {2}{3}\) and irregular uniform distribution of extra-repair symbols

From: GLDPC-Staircase AL-FEC codes: a fundamental study and new results

Decoding threshold r G f(%) Scheme A Scheme B Shannon limit
ε (IT+RS) \(\frac {2}{3}\) [0] 0.2709 0.2709 0.3333
  \(\frac {1}{2}\) [25 50 25] 0.4064 0.3029 0.5
  \(\frac {2}{5}\) [0 25 50 25] 0.4819 0.3765 0.6
  \(\frac {1}{3}\) [0 25 25 10 15 15 10] 0.5598 0.4768 0.6667
\(\bar {\varepsilon }^{\text {ML}}\) \(\frac {2}{3}\) [0] 0.3301 0.3301 0.3333
  \(\frac {1}{2}\) [25 50 25] 0.4993 0.4997 0.5
  \(\frac {2}{5}\) [0 25 50 25] 0.5997 0.5999 0.6
  \(\frac {1}{3}\) [0 25 25 10 15 15 10] 0.6665 0.6666 0.6667