Table 7 Decoding threshold comparison between (IT + RS) decoding and ML decoding for different values of r G with \(r_{L}=\frac {2}{3}\) and irregular uniform distribution of extra-repair symbols
From: GLDPC-Staircase AL-FEC codes: a fundamental study and new results
Decoding threshold | r G | f(%) | Scheme A | Scheme B | Shannon limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ε (IT+RS) | \(\frac {2}{3}\) | [0] | 0.2709 | 0.2709 | 0.3333 |
\(\frac {1}{2}\) | [25 50 25] | 0.4064 | 0.3029 | 0.5 | |
\(\frac {2}{5}\) | [0 25 50 25] | 0.4819 | 0.3765 | 0.6 | |
\(\frac {1}{3}\) | [0 25 25 10 15 15 10] | 0.5598 | 0.4768 | 0.6667 | |
\(\bar {\varepsilon }^{\text {ML}}\) | \(\frac {2}{3}\) | [0] | 0.3301 | 0.3301 | 0.3333 |
\(\frac {1}{2}\) | [25 50 25] | 0.4993 | 0.4997 | 0.5 | |
\(\frac {2}{5}\) | [0 25 50 25] | 0.5997 | 0.5999 | 0.6 | |
\(\frac {1}{3}\) | [0 25 25 10 15 15 10] | 0.6665 | 0.6666 | 0.6667 |