Skip to main content

Table 2 Cooperative-based detection schemes

From: A survey of local/cooperative-based malicious information detection techniques in VANETs

MDS Type Drawback Privacy Position Delay Overhead (FP) Rate Applications  
IDS/RC2RL [65] Behaviour Performance degradation in case of sparse network No Yes High Low Min Position data  
(RCBD) [9] Behaviour Loss of acknowledgement due to bad signal No Yes High High Min CRN  
(DBD) [66] Consistency No validation for performance evaluation Yes Yes High High Not mentioned Not mentioned  
(DBSSI) [67] Consistency Minimum threshold might create more false positive rate No Yes High Low Min   
(SIBD) [68] Consistency Malicious nodes can generate secondary information in low density network No No Low Low Min PCN  
RD4 [69] Consistency Degradation in accuracy due to high mobility No No Low Low Min PCN  
(VARM) [70] Consistency Computation overhead for single node No Yes Low High Not mentioned Not mentioned  
(DWD) [71] Consistency Detection will take more time in case of increase in malicious nodes Yes Yes Low Low Max CRN  
(FHR) [23] Consistency Mechanism uses for static events Yes Yes High Low Not mentioned PCN  
(C-DAC) [3] Consistency Multiple malicious nodes can degrade performance No Yes High High Not mention PCN,CRN  
(Host IDS) [73] Consistency Honest neighbour nodes must be prerequisite for detection No Yes High Low Min PCN,CRN  
(SLBD) [22] Consistency More parameters can be used for accurate result No Yes Low High Min Position data