A survey of local/cooperative-based malicious information detection techniques in VANETs

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Table 2 Cooperative-based detection schemes

MDS	Type	Drawback	Privacy	Position	Delay	Overhead	(FP) Rate	Applications
IDS/RC²RL [65]	Behaviour	Performance degradation in case of sparse network	No	Yes	High	Low	Min	Position data
(RCBD) [9]	Behaviour	Loss of acknowledgement due to bad signal	No	Yes	High	High	Min	CRN
(DBD) [66]	Consistency	No validation for performance evaluation	Yes	Yes	High	High	Not mentioned	Not mentioned
(DBSSI) [67]	Consistency	Minimum threshold might create more false positive rate	No	Yes	High	Low	Min
(SIBD) [68]	Consistency	Malicious nodes can generate secondary information in low density network	No	No	Low	Low	Min	PCN
RD⁴ [69]	Consistency	Degradation in accuracy due to high mobility	No	No	Low	Low	Min	PCN
(VARM) [70]	Consistency	Computation overhead for single node	No	Yes	Low	High	Not mentioned	Not mentioned
(DWD) [71]	Consistency	Detection will take more time in case of increase in malicious nodes	Yes	Yes	Low	Low	Max	CRN
(FHR) [23]	Consistency	Mechanism uses for static events	Yes	Yes	High	Low	Not mentioned	PCN
(C-DAC) [3]	Consistency	Multiple malicious nodes can degrade performance	No	Yes	High	High	Not mention	PCN,CRN
(Host IDS) [73]	Consistency	Honest neighbour nodes must be prerequisite for detection	No	Yes	High	Low	Min	PCN,CRN
(SLBD) [22]	Consistency	More parameters can be used for accurate result	No	Yes	Low	High	Min	Position data