Table 1 The accuracy of each methods under different situations
From: PCA-Kalman: device-free indoor human behavior detection with commodity Wi-Fi
Different method in different scenarios | The detection accuracy of different actions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (squat) (%) | 2 (jump) (%) | 3 (walk) (%) | 4 (waved) (%) | 5 (turn around) (%) | ||
LOS | Sensor | 86.82 | 90.90 | 85.24 | 91.49 | 90.88 |
NotiFi | 89.62 | 92.98 | 86.34 | 92.50 | 92.78 | |
PCA-Kalman | 92.45 | 93.95 | 88.39 | 94.28 | 93.38 | |
NLOS | Sensor | 81.82 | 80.40 | 79.18 | 85.60 | 80.96 |
NotiFi | 85.98 | 82.90 | 81.24 | 86.89 | 83.88 | |
PCA-Kalman | 88.45 | 84.89 | 83.39 | 87.28 | 85.38 | |
through one wall | Sensor | 79.82 | 80.90 | 82.25 | 80.49 | 82.89 |
NotiFi | 78.98 | 78.60 | 81.38 | 77.49 | 80.78 | |
PCA-Kalman | 80.55 | 81.95 | 82.59 | 81.38 | 85.30 | |