Table 4 Attack sample detection comparison
From: A new intrusion detection and alarm correlation technology based on neural network
Type of data | Number of Neurs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15 (%) | 17 (%) | 20 (%) | 22 (%) | 25 (%) | |
Neptune | 97.50 | 95.50 | 97.50 | 96.00 | 98.25 |
Process table | 39.04 | 36.12 | 38.47 | 30.08 | 43.10 |
Back | 86.50 | 76.34 | 81.86 | 70.25 | 87.52 |
APache2 | 90.40 | 62.20 | 84.93 | 59.53 | 95.95 |
Teardrop | 76.67 | 44.44 | 68.89 | 38.895 | 78.89 |
Warezmaster | 53.48 | 48.37 | 52.56 | 46.51 | 59.07 |
Sshprocesstable | 62.47 | 53.11 | 60.22 | 50.45 | 65.08 |
POD | 99.49 | 98.46 | 99.32 | 97.95 | 99.49 |
Smurf | 31.25 | 34.82 | 32.14 | 39.29 | 23.21 |
Mailbomb | 26.50 | 18.50 | 22.50 | 16.00 | 28.50 |
Udpstorm | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Selfping | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Warezsilent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Syslogd | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Crashiis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Land | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dosnuke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |