Table 5 Solution, protocol compare, and social characteristics
From: Content distribution and protocol design issue for mobile social networks: a survey
Solution | Unicast or multicast | Protocols for comparison | Social characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
LABEL [84] | Unicast, multicast | MCP, WAIT, Control | Community |
BUBBLE RAP [85] | Unicast, multicast | MCP, LABEL, FLOOD,WAIT | Community degree centrality |
LocalCom [86] | Unicast, multicast | PROPHET, Bubble Rap | Community tie strength betweenness centrality |
Friendship-based [87] | Unicast, multicast | PROPHET, SimBet | Community, friendship, similarity, tie strength |
Gently [88] | Unicast, multicast | PRPHET | Community |
DR [89] | Unicast, multicast | SimBet, Epidemic | Community |
SimBet [90] | Unicast | PROPHET, Epidemic | Betweenness centrality similarity |
SimBetTs [91] | Unicast | PROPHET, Epidemic | Betweenness centrality, similarity, tie strength |
HiBOp [92] | Unicast multicast | PROPHT, Epidemic | Context information, Social relationship, similarity |
PeopleRank [93] | Unicast | SimBet | Friendship, similarity |
Social-based [94] | Multicast | Epidemic, BubbleRap, PROPIIET, SimBet | Community, centrality |
Fair Routing [95] | Unicast | Epidemic, PROPHET, SimBet | Community, centrality |
Community-aware opportunistic routing (CAOR) [107] | Multicast | PROPHT, Bubble Rep, SimBet | Community, similarity |
Zero-knowledge multi-copy routing {108] | Multicast | Epidemic, Spray and Wait | Community, centrality |
Homing spread: community home-based multi-copy routing in MSN [108] | Unicast multicast | Epidemic, Home spreading, Spray and Wait | Community, centrality |