Table 3 Comparative analysis of WGWO for the delay parameter
From: Hybrid WGWO: whale grey wolf optimization-based novel energy-efficient clustering for EH-WSNs
Nodes vs. delay (ms) | % Improvements of WGWO as compared with existing schemes | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of nodes ↓ | TBC | Partition-based LEACH | LCM | ETSSEP | WGWO | % Improvements of WGWO as compared with ETSSEP | % Improvements of WGWO as compared with LCM | % Improvements of WGWO as compared with partition-based LEACH | % Improvements of WGWO as compared with TBC |
100 | 84.8 | 60 | 35.6 | 20 | 10 | 50.00 | 71.91 | 83.33 | 88.21 |
200 | 98 | 73.2 | 50 | 36.65 | 22 | 39.97 | 56.00 | 69.95 | 77.55 |
300 | 112 | 89.25 | 67.65 | 50 | 35 | 30.00 | 48.26 | 60.78 | 68.75 |
400 | 130 | 108.25 | 90 | 72.25 | 60 | 16.96 | 33.33 | 44.57 | 53.85 |
500 | 150 | 125.5 | 109.8 | 92 | 80 | 13.04 | 27.14 | 36.25 | 46.67 |
Average % improvements → | 29.99 | 52.38 | 58.98 | 67.00 | |||||