Table 7 Comparative analysis of WGWO for the network lifetime parameter
From: Hybrid WGWO: whale grey wolf optimization-based novel energy-efficient clustering for EH-WSNs
Nodes vs. network life time (s) | % Improvements of WGWO as compared with existing schemes | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of nodes ↓ | TBC | Partition-based LEACH | LCM | ETSSEP | WGWO | % Improvements of WGWO as compared with ETSSEP | % Improvements of WGWO as compared with LCM | % Improvements of WGWO as compared with partition-based LEACH | % Improvements of WGWO as compared with TBC |
100 | 400 | 442.5 | 474 | 500 | 555 | 9.91 | 14.59 | 20.27 | 27.93 |
200 | 282.5 | 346 | 400 | 475 | 536.5 | 11.46 | 25.44 | 35.51 | 47.34 |
300 | 150 | 232.5 | 330 | 445.5 | 508 | 12.30 | 35.04 | 54.23 | 70.47 |
400 | 122.5 | 200 | 290 | 396 | 466.5 | 15.11 | 37.83 | 57.13 | 73.74 |
500 | 86.9 | 150 | 240 | 350 | 425 | 17.65 | 43.53 | 64.71 | 79.55 |
Average % improvements → | 13.29 | 31.29 | 46.37 | 59.81 | |||||