Table 5 Evaluation score of training system analysis results based on event driven programming (points)
Athlete number | Instrument simulation | System simulation time | The importance of training content | Power simulation accuracy | Analysis of information content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 78.5 | 63 | 59 | 70 | 66 |
2 | 74.5 | 66 | 60 | 76 | 66 |
3 | 79.2 | 70 | 62 | 78 | 67 |
4 | 75.3 | 62 | 60 | 70 | 69 |
5 | 74.7 | 61 | 61 | 76 | 71 |
6 | 73.4 | 66 | 62 | 75 | 63 |
7 | 74.1 | 69 | 58 | 78 | 66 |
8 | 79.76 | 65 | 59 | 69 | 70 |
9 | 76.2 | 70 | 60 | 72 | 67 |
10 | 71.4 | 66 | 66 | 75 | 68 |
11 | 69.7 | 69 | 65 | 70 | 64 |
12 | 75.5 | 66 | 62 | 73 | 64 |
13 | 75.4 | 68 | 60 | 71 | 63 |
14 | 79.7 | 69 | 62 | 72 | 37 |
15 | 72.1 | 62 | 60 | 74 | 65 |
Average score | 75.3 | 66.1 | 61.1 | 73.3 | 64.4 |