Skip to main content
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Table 2 The result of different states investigated in the separation of interleaved pulse trains by methods A and B

From: Pulse deinterleaving based on fusing PDWs and PRI extraction process for radar-assisted edge devices considering computational costs

Stage

Pulse separation algorithm

Correct emitters detected

False emitters detected

Processing time (s)

Classic/staggered/jittered

Classic/staggered/jittered

I

By method A

2

0

0

0

0

0

.1617

 

By method B

0

0

0

0

0

0

.2532

II

By method A

1

1

1

0

0

0

2.33

 

By method B

1

0

0

0

0

1

.5293

III

By method A

2

2

0

0

0

0

.6934

 

By method B

2

2

0

0

0

0

.5632

IV

By method A

2

2

1

0

0

1

5.33

 

By method B

1

1

0

0

0

2

2.65

V

By method A

3

3

0

0

0

0

4.32

 

By method B

2

1

0

2

0

0

2.91

VI

By method A

3

3

2

1

0

0

4.85

 

By method B

1

2

1

0

0

0

2.91

  1. Stage I = 2 classic radars
  2. Stage II = 1 classic radar, 1 staggered radar, 1 jittered radar
  3. Stage III = 2 classic radars, 2 staggered radars
  4. Stage IV = 2 classic radars, 2 staggered radars, 1 jittered radar
  5. Stage V = 3 classic radars, 3 staggered radars,
  6. Stage VI = 3 classic radars, 3 staggered radars, 2 jittered radars
Back to article page