Skip to main content

Table 2 The result of different states investigated in the separation of interleaved pulse trains by methods A and B

From: Pulse deinterleaving based on fusing PDWs and PRI extraction process for radar-assisted edge devices considering computational costs

Stage Pulse separation algorithm Correct emitters detected False emitters detected Processing time (s)
Classic/staggered/jittered Classic/staggered/jittered
I By method A 2 0 0 0 0 0 .1617
  By method B 0 0 0 0 0 0 .2532
II By method A 1 1 1 0 0 0 2.33
  By method B 1 0 0 0 0 1 .5293
III By method A 2 2 0 0 0 0 .6934
  By method B 2 2 0 0 0 0 .5632
IV By method A 2 2 1 0 0 1 5.33
  By method B 1 1 0 0 0 2 2.65
V By method A 3 3 0 0 0 0 4.32
  By method B 2 1 0 2 0 0 2.91
VI By method A 3 3 2 1 0 0 4.85
  By method B 1 2 1 0 0 0 2.91
  1. Stage I = 2 classic radars
  2. Stage II = 1 classic radar, 1 staggered radar, 1 jittered radar
  3. Stage III = 2 classic radars, 2 staggered radars
  4. Stage IV = 2 classic radars, 2 staggered radars, 1 jittered radar
  5. Stage V = 3 classic radars, 3 staggered radars,
  6. Stage VI = 3 classic radars, 3 staggered radars, 2 jittered radars