Table 3 Comparison of dynamic monitoring results with sparse personnel density
From: A method of pedestrian flow monitoring based on received signal strength
Group | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Mean error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manual counting | 8 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 15 | Â |
GMM–HMM counting | 9 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 16.7 |
GBDT counting | 9 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 8.3 |
SVM counting | 8 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 5.5 |