Skip to main content

Table 2 Hops versus latency

From: Performance evaluation and comparison study of adaptive MANET service location and discovery protocols for highly dynamic environments

Hops \(\mu _{\mathrm{sdy}}\) (\(\sigma _{\mathrm{sdy}}\)) \(\mu _{\mathrm{bind}}\) (\(\sigma _{\mathrm{bind}}\)) \(\mu _{\mathrm{total}}\) (\(\sigma _{\mathrm{total}}\))
(a) Directory-based: Unicast SDQ and SDY
1 3.26 (0.25) 3.43 (0.22) 6.69 (0.34)
2 6.73 (0.37) 6.87 (0.35) 13.61 (0.52)
3 10.21 (0.44) 10.43 (0.45) 20.64 (0.63)
4 13.73 (0.54) 13.95 (0.52) 27.68 (0.73)
5 17.27 (0.58) 17.44 (0.60) 34.71 (0.83)
6 20.74 (0.63) 20.96 (0.62) 41.70 (0.87)
(b) Directory-less: Broadcast SDQ and Unicast SDY
1 8.24 (3.50) 4.54 (2.25) 12.78 (4.31)
2 14.97 (4.22) 7.73 (0.79) 22.71 (4.10)
3 22.74 (5.14) 11.40 (1.30) 34.13 (5.33)
4 30.34 (5.93) 14.33 (1.82) 44.67 (6.41)
5 37.72 (6.34) 17.49 (0.63) 55.22 (6.42)
6 45.38 (7.25) 22.24 (2.69) 67.62 (8.30)
(c) PDP: Broadcast SDQ and SDY
1 12.04 (4.29) 4.20 (1.92) 16.24 (4.85)
2 23.57 (5.78) 7.17 (0.96) 30.73 (5.77)
3 35.35 (7.22) 11.29 (1.61) 46.64 (7.52)
4 46.97 (7.98) 14.43 (1.74) 61.40 (8.33)
5 58.93 (9.09) 17.96 (1.64) 76.90 (9.49)
6 69.94 (10.23) 22.70 (3.39) 92.64 (10.78)