Table 4 Average results of 6LoWPAN performance in two hops test
From: Performance analysis of 6LoWPAN protocol for a flood monitoring system
TEST | Static routing | RPL routing | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Node 2 | Node 3 | Node 2 | Node 3 | |
Request/reply ping rate (%) | ||||
LPL = 0 ms (No LPL)—1133 B | 273/273 | 306/158 | 277/276 | 172/87 |
LPL = 512 ms—1133 B | 272/132 | 302/65 | 278/141 | 298/55 |
LPL = 1024 ms—1133 B | 300/120 | 295/60 | 303/131 | 331/57 |
RTT length time (s) | ||||
LPL = 0 ms (No LPL) | 0.66 | 1.07 | 0.66 | 1.07 |
LPL = 512 ms | 0.87 | 1.56 | 0.9 | 1.41 |
LPL = 1024 ms | 1.13 | 2.12 | 1.12 | 2.07 |
RTT send average delay (s) | ||||
LPL = 0 ms (No LPL) | 1 | 1.93 | 1 | 1.98 |
LPL = 512 ms | 2.07 | 4.81 | 1.98 | 5.33 |
LPL = 1024 ms | 2.52 | 4.96 | 2.33 | 5.53 |
Packet send average delay (s) | ||||
LPL = 0 ms (No LPL) | 1 | 1.002 | 1 | 1.003 |
LPL = 512 ms | 1.003 | 1.005 | 1.003 | 1.006 |
LPL = 1024 ms | 1.004 | 1.005 | 1.004 | 1.006 |
Jitter packet send (s) | ||||
LPL = 0 ms (No LPL) | 0 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.003 |
LPL = 512 ms | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.006 |
LPL = 1024 ms | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.004 | 0.005 |