Table 5 Detection results of different schemes with different module combination
From: A two-stage detection method of copy-move forgery based on parallel feature fusion
Name | Description | TPR (%) | FPR (%) | F1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Scheme 1 [33] | Uniform-type segmentation + progressive fusion feature | 97.2 | 6.4 | 92.9 |
Scheme 2 | SLIC + progressive fusion feature | 97.5 | 6.2 | 93.3 |
Scheme 3 | SLIC + parallel fusion feature | 97.9 | 5.5 | 94.1 |
Scheme 4 (our method) | SLIC + parallel fusion feature + adaptive threshold generation | 98.5 | 5.7 | 94.3 |