Table 9 Comparison of different methods
From: A two-stage detection method of copy-move forgery based on parallel feature fusion
Methods | TPR (%) | FPR (%) | F1 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
CKN | 93 | 11 | 87.2 |
Peng [30] | 97.2 | 6.4 | 92.9 |
Our | 98.5 | 5.7 | 94.3 |
From: A two-stage detection method of copy-move forgery based on parallel feature fusion
Methods | TPR (%) | FPR (%) | F1 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
CKN | 93 | 11 | 87.2 |
Peng [30] | 97.2 | 6.4 | 92.9 |
Our | 98.5 | 5.7 | 94.3 |