Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary of the performance of each model on the NSL-KDD dataset

From: Network abnormal traffic detection method based on fusion of chord similarity and multiple loss encoder

No.

Method

Accuracy (%)

Type

1

Multi-layer Preceptron [38]

77.41

Deep Learning based methods

2

Recurrent Neural Network [54]

83.28

 

3

AE+Guassian Naïve Bayes [59]

83.34

 

4

STL+SVM [60]

84.96

 

5

AE+SMR [61]

88.39

 

6

AE by Sadef et al. [51]

88.98

 

7

AE by Xu et al. [55]

90.61

 

8

DNN [51]

89.00

 

9

DCNN [62]

84.58

 

10

SVM [38]

69.52

Conventional classification methods

11

Naïve Bayes [38]

76.56

 

12

J48 [38]

81.05

 

13

NB tree [38]

82.02

 

14

Random forest [38]

80.67

 

15

Random tree [38]

81.59

 

16

Fuzzy approach [56]

84.12

 

17

NADLA

92.79

 
  1. The accuracy of the model we present is marked with bold font