Skip to main content

Table 5 Performance evaluation of the proposed design against those of the previous literature

From: 5G millimeter wave wideband MIMO antenna arrays with high isolation

References

Number of ports

Type of substrate

Decoupling- method

Isolation

improvement

(dB)

Design -complexity

BW

GHz

Size

mm3

DG

ECC

Gain (dBi)

Efficiency %

[9]

8

FR4

DGS

 − 12

Easy

3.2:4

150 × 75 × 1.6

Not found

 < 0.01

2.5

70

[10]

4

Rogers RT/Duroid5880

 − 12

Easy

28

41.3 × 46 × 0.508

Not found

Not found

13.1

Not found

[11]

 

FR4

Decoupling structure

 − 14

Medium

5.2:5.8

42 × 42 × 0.8

Not found

Not found

5

80

[12]

6

FR4

Metamaterial photonic bandgap

 − 12

Easy

9.25:11

120 × 40 × 

1.6

Not found

Not found

7.38

88%

[13]

4

FR4

Meta-surface

 − 10

Easy

8.4:12.6

13.4:14.2

16.5:16.8

8.5:20.3

40 × 40 × 1.6

Not found

<  0.15

Not found

Not found

[14]

4

Rogers R04350B

DGS

 − 20

Medium

25.5:29.6

30 × 35 × 0.76

 > 9.96

 < 0.01

8.3

82

[15]

8

Rogers Duroid 5880

 − 20

Medium

27.5: 29.5

92.73 × 28.62 × 1.64

Not found

Not found

9.3

Not found

[16]

4

FR4

Metamaterial

 − 15

Easy

9.12:9.96

40 × 40 × 1.6

Not found

Not found

5.4

Not found

[17]

2

FR4

Fractal load

 − 13

Easy

8.7:17.1

22:26

29:34.2

70 × 37 × 1.6

Not found

Not found

9

93%

[18]

2

FR4

MTM-DS

 − 15

Easy

9.95:10.63

40 × 20 × 1.6

Not found

Not found

5.4

Not found

[19]

4

FR4

Metamaterial

 − 17

Easy

8:9.25

120 × 90 × 1.6

Not found

Not found

7

88%

[20]

4

RO4003

εr = 3.55

Decoupling lines

 − 20

Medium

24:40

13.75 × 13.7 × 0.787

10

0.15

5

85%

Pro-posed design

2

FR4

Decoupling surface on ground

 − 30

Easy

27:40

Especially 28 and 38 GHz

55.27 × 27.635 × 1.6

10

<  1 × 10–4

10

95%