Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of previous related survey papers

From: Routing protocols based on node selection for freely floating underwater wireless sensor networks: a survey

References

Year

classification

Main goal

advantages

[26]

2017

Vector-based, depth based, clustered based, AUV based,

Routing protocols based on node mobility

Considering node mobility Analytical and numerical simulation method

[27]

2017

Localization-based protocols

Localization-free protocols

Detailed description of the classified protocols with a focus on their energy efficiency

Exhaustive comparison of the described protocols according to many performance aspects

[28]

2018

Localization-based protocols

Localization-free protocols

Exhaustive literature review along with the merits and demerits of each described protocol

Personalized sub-classification of every class according to its particularity

[29]

2020

Localization-based protocols

Localization-free protocols

Cooperative routing protocols

Detailed description of the protocols related to the provided description as well as their advantages and disadvantages

Newly introduced classification paradigm related to “cooperative routing”

Detailed description of UASN background

[30]

2021

Energy-based protocols

Data-based protocols

Geographic information-based protocols

Comparative study with learned lessons and future research directions

Unique classification of recent routing protocols,

Detailed performance comparison: end-to-end delay, energy consumption and packet delivery ratio