Open Access

Equalization of Sparse Intersymbol-Interference Channels Revisited

  • Jan Mietzner1Email author,
  • Sabah Badri-Hoeher1,
  • Ingmar Land2 and
  • Peter A Hoeher1
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking20062006:029075

DOI: 10.1155/WCN/2006/29075

Received: 18 April 2005

Accepted: 28 February 2006

Published: 25 April 2006


Sparse intersymbol-interference (ISI) channels are encountered in a variety of communication systems, especially in high-data-rate systems. These channels have a large memory length, but only a small number of significant channel coefficients. In this paper, equalization of sparse ISI channels is revisited with focus on trellis-based techniques. Due to the large channel memory length, the complexity of maximum-likelihood sequence estimation by means of the Viterbi algorithm is normally prohibitive. In the first part of the paper, a unified framework based on factor graphs is presented for complexity reduction without loss of optimality. In this new context, two known reduced-complexity trellis-based techniques are recapitulated. In the second part of the paper a simple alternative approach is investigated to tackle general sparse ISI channels. It is shown that the use of a linear filter at the receiver renders the application of standard reduced-state trellis-based equalization techniques feasible without significant loss of optimality.


Authors’ Affiliations

Information and Coding Theory Lab (ICT), Faculty of Engineering, University of Kiel
Department of Communication Technology, Digital Communications Division, Aalborg University


  1. Rappaport TS: Wireless Communications—Principles and Practice. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA; 1996.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Lee FKH, McLane PJ: Design of nonuniformly spaced tapped-delay-line equalizers for sparse multipath channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications 2004,52(4):530–535. 10.1109/TCOMM.2004.826351View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fevrier IJ, Gelfand SB, Fitz MP: Reduced complexity decision feedback equalization for multipath channels with large delay spreads. IEEE Transactions on Communications 1999,47(6):927–937. 10.1109/26.771349View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cotter SF, Rao BD: The adaptive matching pursuit algorithm for estimation and equalization of sparse time-varying channels. Proceedings of the 34th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, November 2000, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA 2: 1772–1776.
  5. Haratsch EF, Blanksby AJ, Azadet K: Reduced-state sequence estimation with tap-selectable decision-feedback. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '00), June 2000, New Orleans, La, USA 1: 372–376.
  6. Rontogiannis AA, Berberidis K: Efficient decision feedback equalization for sparse wireless channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2003,2(3):570–581. 10.1109/TWC.2003.811189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Benvenuto N, Marchesani R: The Viterbi algorithm for sparse channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications 1996,44(3):287–289. 10.1109/26.486320View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. McGinty NC, Kennedy RA, Hoeher PA: Parallel trellis Viterbi algorithm for sparse channels. IEEE Communications Letters 1998,2(5):143–145. see also: N. C. McGinty, R. A. Kennedy, and P. A. Hoeher, "Equalization of sparse ISI channels using parallel trellises," in Proceedings of 7th Communication Theory Mini-Conference in conjunction with IEEE Globecom '98, pp. 65–70, 1998 10.1109/4234.673661View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. McGinty NC: Reduced complexity equalization for data communication, Ph.D. dissertation. , Canberra, Australia; 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Lee FKH, McLane PJ: Iterative parallel-trellis MAP equalizers with nonuniformly-spaced prefilters for sparse multipath channels. Proceedings of 56th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '02), September 2002, Vancouver, BC, Canada 4: 2201–2205.
  11. Forney GD Jr.: Maximum-likelihood sequence estimation of digital sequences in the presence of intersymbol interference. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1972,18(3):363–378. 10.1109/TIT.1972.1054829MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Bahl LR, Cocke J, Jelinek F, Raviv J: Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1974,20(2):284–287.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Badri-Hoeher S: Digitale Empfängeralgorithmen für TDMA-Mobilfunksysteme mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des EDGE-Systems, Ph.D. dissertation. , Erlangen, Germany; 2001.Google Scholar
  14. Gerstacker WH, Obernosterer F, Meyer R, Huber JB: On prefilter computation for reduced-state equalization. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2002,1(4):793–800. 10.1109/TWC.2002.804159View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Badri-Hoeher S, Hoeher PA: Fast computation of a discrete-time whitened matched filter based on Kalman filtering. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2004,3(6):2417–2424. 10.1109/TWC.2004.833442View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hagenauer J: A soft-in/soft-out list sequential (LISS) decoder for turbo schemes. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT '03), June-July 2003, Kanagawa, Japan 382.
  17. Kuhn C: A bidirectional list-sequential (BI-LISS) equalizer for turbo schemes. Proceedings of the 14th IST Mobile & Wireless Communications Summit, June 2005, Dresden, Germany paper no. 306
  18. Liu L, Leung WK, Ping L: Simple iterative chip-by-chip multiuser detection for CDMA systems. Proceedings of 57th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '03), October 2003, Orlando, Fla, USA 3: 2157–2161.
  19. Loeliger H-A: An introduction to factor graphs. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2004,21(1):28–41. 10.1109/MSP.2004.1267047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Colavolpe G, Germi G: On the application of factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm to ISI channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications 2005,53(5):818–825. 10.1109/TCOMM.2005.847129View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Douillard C, Jezequel M, Berrou C, Picart A, Didier P, Glavieux A: Iterative correction of intersymbol interference: turbo-equalization. European Transactions on Telecommunications and Related Technologies 1995,6(5):507–511. 10.1002/ett.4460060506View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Park J, Gelfand SB: Turbo equalizations for sparse channels. Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC '04), March 2004, Atlanta, Ga, USA 4: 2301–2306.
  23. Cusani R, Mattila J: Equalization of digital radio channels with large multipath delay for cellular land mobile applications. IEEE Transactions on Communications 1999,47(3):348–351. 10.1109/26.752812View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Eyuboǧlu MV, Qureshi SUH: Reduced-state sequence estimation with set partitioning and decision feedback. IEEE Transactions on Communications 1988,36(1):13–20. 10.1109/26.2724View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Duel-Hallen A, Heegard C: Delayed decision-feedback sequence estimation. IEEE Transactions on Communications 1989,37(5):428–436. 10.1109/26.24594View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kammeyer K-D: Time truncation of channel impulse responses by linear filtering: a method to reduce the complexity of Viterbi equalization. AEÜ International Journal of Electronics and Communications 1994,48(5):237–243.Google Scholar
  27. Haykin S: Adaptive Filter Theory. 4th edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA; 2002.MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Al-Dhahir N, Cioffi JM: Efficiently computed reduced-parameter input-aided MMSE equalizers for ML detection: a unified approach. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1996,42(3):903–915. 10.1109/18.490553View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Proakis JG: Digital Communications. 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA; 2001.MATHGoogle Scholar


© Jan Mietzner et al. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.