Skip to main content


  • Research Article
  • Open Access

Evaluation of Cross-Layer Rate-Aware Routing in a Wireless Mesh Network Test Bed

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking20072007:086510

  • Received: 29 June 2006
  • Accepted: 27 November 2006
  • Published:


Real deployments of wireless multihop networks, by Internet service providers (ISPs), have been slowed down by their poor performance and unreliability. The research community has already proved that efficient cross-layer routing, in particular rate-aware routing, can significantly improve performances. Nevertheless, this work has been done mainly by simulations, seldom being implemented in a real environment. We present in this paper the results we obtained by comparing the performances of the traditional routing approach based on the hop-count metric and the cross-layer routing approach based on the transmission rate metric. These measurements have been done on the MeshDVNet test bed we deployed in our laboratory. As a routing protocol, we used two versions (with and without cross-layer metric) of MeshDV, a simple routing protocol expressly designed for wireless mesh networks (WMNs). As our tests clearly show, cross-layer rate-aware metric gives important improvements, in both connectivity and throughput.


  • Information System
  • Service Provider
  • Poor Performance
  • Research Community
  • Transmission Rate


Authors’ Affiliations

Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris 6 (LIP6), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris VI), 104 Avenue du President Kennedy, Paris, 75016, France


  1. Yang L, Zerfos P, Sadot E: Architecture taxonomy for control and provisioning of wireless access points (capwap). RFC 4118, June 2005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Akyildiz IF, Wang X, Wang W: Wireless mesh networks: a survey. Computer Networks 2005,47(4):445-487.MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Deering S, Hinden R: Internet protocol version 6 (ipv6) specification. RFC 2460, December 1998View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Soekris Engineering
  5. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) : Supplement to 802.11-1999, wireless lan mac and phy specifications: higher speed physical layer (phy) extension in the 2.4 ghz band. IEEE Standard 802.11, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. Proxim wireless
  7. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), "802 standard working group, wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications: high-speed physical layer in the 5 ghz band," IEEE 802.11a Standard, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. Netgate
  9. The NetBSD Project
  10. Iannone L, Fdida S: MeshDV: a distance vector mobility-tolerant routing protocol for wireless mesh networks. Proceedings of the 1st IEEE ICPS Workshop on Multi-hop Ad Hoc Networks: From Theory to Reality (REALMAN '05), July 2005, Santorini, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  11. Conta A, Deering S: Internet control message protocol (icmpv6) for the internet protocol version 6 (ipv6) specification. RFC 2463, December 1998.Google Scholar
  12. Perkins C, Bhagwat P: Highly dynamic desination-sequenced distance-vector (dsdv) routing for mobile computers. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Communications Architectures, Protocols and Applications, August-September 1994, London, UK 234-244.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Iannone L, Fdida S: Mrs: a simple cross-layer heuristic to improve throughput capacity in wireless mesh networks. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (CoNEXT '05), October 2005, Toulouse, France 21-30.Google Scholar
  14. Iannone L, Fdida S: Can multi-rate radios reduce end-to-end delay in mesh networks? a simulation case study. MESH NETWORKING: Realizing the Wireless Internet (Meshnets '05), July 2005, Budapest, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  15. DAST/NLANR Iperf Project
  16. Mit roofnet project
  17. Wireless mesh networking at carleton university
  18. Politecnico di Milano MobiMESH
  19. Mesh Networking Academic Resource Toolkit 2005
  20. Ucsb meshnet
  21. Srisuresh P, Egevang K: Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT). RFC 3022, January 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S: Ad hoc on demand distance vector (aodv) routing. RFC 3561, July 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Clausen T, Jacquet P: Optimized link state routing protocol (olsr). RFC 3626, October 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Seok Y, Park J, Choi Y: Multi-rate aware routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. Proceedings of the 57th IEEE Semiannual Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '03), April 2003, Jeju, Korea 3: 1749-1752.Google Scholar


© L. Iannone et al. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.