| Optimum allocation | Proposed algorithm |
---|---|---|
SNR/rate | 12 dB/4.0746 b/s/Hz | 12 dB/4.0746 b/s/Hz |
users served | 9 | 9 |
Users served | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Transmit power | 20.3619 | 20.4446 |
Running time | 18.72 | 5.39 |
/rate | 13 dB/4.3891 b/s/Hz | 13 dB/4.3891 b/s/Hz |
users served | 6 | 6 |
Users served | 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10 | 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Transmit power | 22.9531 | 23.0342 |
Users served | 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 | — |
Transmit power | 23.7717 | — |
Running time | 458.07 | 9.60 |
/rate | 14 dB/4.7070 b/s/Hz | 14 dB/4.7070 b/s/Hz |
users served | 4 | 4 |
Users served | 7, 8, 9, 10 | 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Transmit power | 25.6046 | 25.6195 |
Running time | 850.28 | 11.78 |
SNR/rate | 15 dB/5.0278 b/s/Hz | 15 dB/5.0278 b/s/Hz |
users served | 2 | 2 |
Users served | 8, 10 | 8, 10 |
Transmit power | 7.5310 | 7.5320 |
Running time | 930.11 | 12.92 |
SNR/rate | 16 dB/5.3509 b/s/Hz | 16 dB/5.3509 b/s/Hz |
users served | 1 | 1 |
Users served | 8 | 8 |
Transmit power | 9.8002 | 9.8025 |
Running time | 931.11 | 13.15 |