# Iterative Soft Decision Interference Cancellation for DS-CDMA Employing the Distribution of Interference

- JürgenF Rößler
^{1}Email author, - WolfgangH Gerstacker
^{2}and - JohannesB Huber
^{1}

**2010**:214393

https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/214393

© Jürgen F. Rößler et al. 2010

**Received: **20 June 2009

**Accepted: **18 April 2010

**Published: **23 May 2010

## Abstract

A well-known receiver strategy for direct-sequence code-division multiple-access (DS-CDMA) transmission is iterative soft decision interference cancellation. For calculation of soft estimates used for cancellation, the distribution of residual interference is commonly assumed to be Gaussian. In this paper, we analyze matched filter-based iterative soft decision interference cancellation (MF ISDIC) when utilizing an approximation of the actual probability density function (pdf) of residual interference. In addition, a hybrid scheme is proposed, which reduces computational complexity by considering the strongest residual interferers according to their pdf while the Gaussian assumption is applied to the weak residual interferers. It turns out that the bit error ratio decreases already noticeably when only a small number of residual interferers is regarded according to their pdf. For the considered DS-CDMA transmission the bit error ratio decreases by 80% for high signal-to-noise ratios when modeling all residual interferers but the strongest three to be Gaussian distributed.

## Keywords

## 1. Introduction

The demands on the data rates provided by future mobile communications systems are further increasing especially for the downlink. Higher data rates in the downlink require for example, higher-order modulation schemes and more efficient receiver algorithms to overcome intersymbol interference (ISI) and, additionally for direct-sequence code-division multiple access (DS-CDMA) systems, multiple access interference (MAI).

In this paper we consider the downlink of a DS-CDMA system. Although the optimum solution for the receiver of a user terminal is known [1], its application is prohibitively complex, because the computational effort increases exponentially with the number of users. Therefore, when applying more powerful receiver algorithms than the standard Rake receiver [2], one has to consider suboptimum schemes.

A promising approach was presented in [3], where successive interference cancellation is proposed. This scheme was refined in for example, [4–7] by utilizing soft decisions for cancellation. For calculation of soft decisions, the distribution of residual interference is commonly assumed to be Gaussian. This assumption is accurate according to the central limit theorem [8], when a successive interference cancellation algorithm starts and the number of noteworthy residual interferers is high. But the Gaussian model gets inaccurate as the algorithm converges and the number of relevant residual interferers decreases.

A general discussion of the accuracy of the Gaussian assumption can be found in [9, 10]. In the noniterative approach [11] the distribution of interference is not approximated as Gaussian but modeled via uniform triangular densities which, however, leads to an only minor performance gain. The benefit of employing the actual probability density function (pdf) is for example, recognized in [12, 13] where the distribution of interference is approximated by kernel smoothing, modeling the pdf of interference by a Gaussian mixture density (sum of Gaussian densities) which is then adjusted according to the occurrence of interference. Approximating the pdf of interference with a Gaussian mixture is also proposed in [14], where the approximation is fixed for the entire transmission.

In contrast to these approaches we derive an approximation of the pdf of interference based on probabilities of interfering symbols calculated in the receiver. Our approach uses the matched filter-based iterative soft decision interference cancellation (MF ISDIC) algorithm which was introduced in [6] and extended in [15]. In [6], the algorithm is derived for synchronous DS-CDMA systems with random spreading sequences and binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) symbols considering transmission over an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel. In [15], MF ISDIC is designed for quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) transmission over multipath channels. Extensions to the ISDIC algorithm for linear modulation are proposed in [16].

The paper is organized as follows. First, we introduce the system model in Section 2. We review the MF ISDIC receiver for transmission over multipath channels with general square QAM constellations using the Gaussian assumption according to [15] in Section 3.1 and extend it for use of an approximation of the actual pdf of residual interference in Section 3.2. In Section 3.3, a graphical comparison of the pdf calculated via the Gaussian assumption and the approximation of the actual interference distribution is given. A hybrid scheme is derived in Section 3.4. In Section 4, performance of the introduced algorithms is compared by means of simulations.

## 2. System Model

where is the number of served users, is the number of transmitted QAM symbols per user during the considered time interval, and is the spreading factor which is assumed to be identical for all users. denotes the spreading sequence of user at symbol time which is nonzero for . is the transmitted QAM coefficient of user at symbol time which is taken from a square QAM set of cardinality . The average power of the transmitted coefficients ( : expectation) is denoted by . The coefficients of the QAM set are assumed to be equiprobable and the values and are taken from the set of cardinality . If a user is served with several spreading sequences simultaneously we denote this as multicode transmission. Obviously, this case is also covered by the system model because one user may comprise several virtual users which are served with one spreading sequence each.

where denotes the causal discrete-time channel impulse response of order including the effects of transmit filtering, channel, and continuous-time receiver input filtering. is additive complex white Gaussian noise with variance .

**r**( : transposition) can be expressed as

and . The matrix contains the accordingly stacked spreading sequences and is abbreviated by .

with
and
and
denote the according parts of the matrix
and the vector **a**, respectively. As
we denote the index of the entry
in the vector
. Therefore, the
th column of matrix
is equivalent to the effective spreading sequence of the symbol
. The indices
and
lead to the first symbol
and the last symbol
, respectively, in vector **a** which has any influence on the time interval covered by the effective spreading sequence of the symbol
. Note that this system model also comprises transmission with linear modulation for one user (
) employing spreading factor
. Hence, the algorithm analyzed in the following can also be utilized as a receiver for transmission with linear modulation over dispersive channels.

## 3. Matched Filter-Based Iterative Soft Decision Interference Cancellation (MF ISDIC)

In each iteration of MF ISDIC, soft-decision feedback is performed for cancellation of ISI and MAI in a sequential manner starting from symbol index up to . is the index of the current iteration and , cf. (4), denotes the soft decision on calculated in iteration .

The soft decisions are initialized according to for . For derivation of MF ISDIC, we introduce the vector , which is used for calculation of the soft estimate .

The resulting vector contains significantly less interference compared to when the soft estimates in get better from iteration to iteration.

is an abbreviation for residual ISI and MAI and noise.

with a small constant , or the iteration number exceeds a prescribed limit .

### 3.1. MF ISDIC with Gaussian Assumption

The calculation of soft estimates for general complex-valued symbol alphabets according to (16) is also given in [7]. When assuming symbols of a general phase-shift keying (PSK) or cross QAM constellation for transmission instead of a square QAM constellation, only (14)-(15) have to be modified.

which was also utilized in [18].

### 3.2. MF ISDIC Employing an Approximation of the Actual Interference Distribution

Assuming the residual interference to be Gaussian distributed is well justified according to the central limit theorem [8], when a successive interference cancellation algorithm starts and the number of relevant residual interferers is high. However, the assumption gets inaccurate as the algorithm converges in course of the iterations and the number of relevant residual interferers decreases. In this subsection, we modify MF ISDIC for employment of an approximation of the actual pdf of residual interference which has to be derived first.

Here, denotes the probability that equals .

where denotes ( ). Here we have used, that the power of the noise is as can be seen from the last term in (12) and assumed independence of random variables corresponding to the pdfs to keep mathematical tractability. The latter assumption is an approximation which is fulfilled perfectly only for the a priori pdfs of different symbols but not for their a posteriori pdfs conditioned on the computed soft symbols. With help of the pdf a new soft estimate according to (23) can be calculated utilizing (19).

### 3.3. Comparison of the Gaussian Model with the Approximation of the Actual Interference Distribution

To visualize the difference between the pdf with Gaussian assumption, cf. (18), and the approximation of the actual distribution of interference according to (29), some graphs are given in the following. We assume that no prior knowledge is available, that is, MF ISDIC starts with all prior estimates being zero, and . The crosscorrelation values according to (10) are selected to and 4QAM ( ) is used.

### 3.4. Hybrid MF ISDIC

Calculation of according to (29) is very complex. To reduce complexity we propose a hybrid scheme, where the approximation of the pdf is simplified by considering only the strongest residual interferers according to their pdf and applying the Gaussian assumption to the weak residual interferers. Obviously, for the hybrid scheme, the number of terms in (29) decreases and additionally includes the power of the weak residual interferers. The strongest interferer is defined as the one that has the highest value .

It is sufficient to approximate the pdfs which have the weakest power with Gaussian pdfs. As all of these pdfs have zero mean, the Gaussian approximation can be performed in (28) by substituting the corresponding pdf by a Dirac pulse and incrementing by . The number of pdfs which are taken into account according to their pdf is denoted with .

The resulting pdf for hybrid MF ISDIC consists of a sum of Gaussian densities and therefore has the same form like the pdfs in [12–14]. But in contrast to these approaches the resulting pdf of interference is derived based on probabilities of interfering symbols calculated in the receiver. Thus, a better approximation is expected.

To judge the accuracy of the hybrid scheme in comparison to the scheme with the Gaussian assumption, an analysis according to the Kullback Leibler distance (KLD) [19] is conducted in the following. The KLD is a measure for the similarity of two pdfs, where a value of corresponds to a perfect match. First, dB is considered. The KLD of the approximation of the actual pdf in Figure 2 and the corresponding pdf with Gaussian assumption in Figure 1 is . In contrast, the KLD of the approximation of the actual pdf in Figure 2 and the corresponding pdf with hybrid approximation in Figure 5 is . Obviously, the approximation of the actual pdf is matched more accurately by the hybrid approach than by the Gaussian assumption. For dB, the following observations can be made. The KLD of the approximation of the actual pdf in Figure 4 and the corresponding pdf with Gaussian assumption in Figure 3 is . In contrast, the KLD of the approximation of the actual pdf in Figure 4 and the corresponding pdf with hybrid approximation in Figure 6 is . Here, the approximation of the actual pdf is matched almost perfectly by the hybrid scheme—much better than with the Gaussian assumption.

## 4. Numerical Results and Discussion

This power delay profile is an approximation of the power delay profile of the vehicular test channel [20] for chip-spaced paths. An ideal power control algorithm is assumed resulting in a normalization of the sum of all instantaneous tap powers to one. Uncoded multicode transmission is applied using spreading sequences with spreading factor , representing the whole load of the base station. The channel is constant during the transmission of one block, that is, a block fading channel model is used. For simulations, has been chosen to , the number of iterations maximally tolerated to , and ( for 4QAM). Note that this scenario is related to a high speed downlink packet access (HSDPA) transmission with UMTS.

In Figure 7 simulation results for MF ISDIC employing the common Gaussian assumption and hybrid MF ISDIC are shown for 4QAM transmission. For hybrid MF ISDIC, all but the strongest residual interferers are modeled to be Gaussian distributed. Obviously, the bit error ratio (BER) can be lowered by 80 for high by applying the proposed hybrid MF ISDIC, assuming that all residual interferers but the strongest three are Gaussian distributed.

## 5. Concluding Remarks

In this paper, a receiver algorithm performing matched filter-based iterative soft decision interference cancellation (ISDIC) which was proposed recently has been analyzed for a DS-CDMA downlink transmission over multipath channels when employing general square QAM constellations. The commonly used Gaussian assumption for the pdf of residual interference has been replaced by a better approximation of the exact pdf. Additionally, a hybrid scheme has been proposed, which provides less computational complexity by considering only the strongest residual interferers according to their pdf while the Gaussian assumption is applied to the weak residual interferers. The algorithms have been compared by means of simulations for an UMTS scenario, and it has been shown, that the bit error ratio decreases already noticeably when only a small number of residual interferers is processed according to their pdf. In fact, for the considered DS-CDMA transmission we have been able to lower the bit error ratio by 80 for high signal-to-noise ratios when modeling all residual interferers but the strongest three to be Gaussian distributed.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgment

This work has been presented in part at the Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring 2003), Jeju, Korea.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Verdú S: Minimum probability of error for asynchronous Gaussian multiple-access channels.
*IEEE Transactions on Information Theory*1986, 32(1):85-96. 10.1109/TIT.1986.1057121MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Proakis J:
*Digital Communications*. 3rd edition. McGraw–Hill, New York, NY, USA; 1995.Google Scholar - Patel P, Holtzman J: Analysis of a simple successive interference cancellation scheme in a DS/CDMA system.
*IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications*1994, 12(5):796-807. 10.1109/49.298053View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Frey T, Reinhardt M: Signal estimation for interference cancellation and decision feedback equalization.
*Proceedings of Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '97), May 1997, Phoenix, Ariz, USA*155-159.Google Scholar - Divsalar D, Simon MK, Raphaeli D: Improved parallel interference cancellation for CDMA.
*IEEE Transactions on Communications*1998, 46(2):258-268. 10.1109/26.659484View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Müller R, Huber J: Iterated soft–decision interference cancellation for CDMA. In
*Broadband Wireless Communications*. Edited by: Luise M, Pupolin S. Springer, London, UK; 1998:110-115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sgraja C, Teich W, Engelhart A, Lindner J: Multiuser/multisubchannel detection based on recurrent neural network structures for linear modulation schemes with general complex–valued symbol alphabet.
*COST Workshop 262, Technical Report ITUU-TR-2001/01, January 2001, Ulm, Germany,*45-52.Google Scholar - Papoulis A:
*Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes*. 3rd edition. McGraw–Hill, New York, NY, USA; 1991.Google Scholar - van Rooyen P, Solms F: Maximum entropy investigation of the inter user interference distribution in a DS/SSMA system.
*Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC '95), September 1995, Toronto, Canada*1308-1312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Poor H, Verdú S: Probability of error in MMSE multiuser detection.
*IEEE Transactions on Information Theory*1997, 43(3):858-871. 10.1109/18.568697MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Mailaender L: Non-linear detectors for multiuser CDMA exploiting non-Gaussianity.
*Proceedings of the 31st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, November 1997, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA*1410-1414.Google Scholar - Li Y, Li KH: Iterative PDF estimation and turbo-decoding scheme for DS-CDMA systems with non-Gaussian global noise.
*Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunication Conference (Globecom '01), November 2001, San Antonio, Tex, USA*3262-3266.Google Scholar - Luschi C, Mulgrew B: Nonparametric trellis equalization in the presence of non-Gaussian interference.
*IEEE Transactions on Communications*2003, 51(2):229-239. 10.1109/TCOMM.2003.809249View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhang Y, Blum RS: Iterative multiuser detection for turbo-coded synchronous CDMA in Gaussian and non-Gaussian impulsive noise.
*IEEE Transactions on Communications*2001, 49(3):397-400. 10.1109/26.911444MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rößler J, Huber J: Iterative soft decision interference cancellation receivers for DS–CDMA downlink employing 4QAM and 16QAM.
*Proceedings of the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2002, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA*Google Scholar - Rößler JF, Gerstacker WH, Huber JB: Iterative equalization with soft feedback with a subsequent stage employing error search and correction.
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*2008, 57(1):335-344.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Tarköy F: MMSE-optimal feedback and its applications.
*Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT '95), September 1995, Whistler, Canada*334.Google Scholar - Rößler J, Gerstacker W, Lampe A, Huber J: Matched–filter– and MMSE–based iterative equalization with soft feedback for QPSK transmission.
*Proceedings of the Zurich Seminar, February 2002, Zurich, Switzerland*191-196.Google Scholar - Cover T, Thomas J:
*Elements of Information Theory*. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1991.MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar - T.-R. 3GPP, TR 101 112 : Selection procedures for the choice of radio transmission technologies of the UMTS (UMTS 30.03 version 3.2.0). V3.2.0, April 1998Google Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.