 Research Article
 Open Access
Appropriate Algorithms for Estimating FrequencySelective Rician Fading MIMO Channels and Channel Rice Factor: Substantial Benefits of Rician Model and Estimator Tradeoffs
 Hamid Nooralizadeh^{1}Email author and
 Shahriar Shirvani Moghaddam^{2}
https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/753637
© Hamid Nooralizadeh and Shahriar Shirvani Moghaddam. 2010
 Received: 8 May 2010
 Accepted: 17 August 2010
 Published: 19 August 2010
Abstract
The trainingbased channel estimation (TBCE) scheme in multipleinput multipleoutput (MIMO) frequencyselective Rician fading channels is investigated. We propose the new technique of shifted scaled least squares (SSLS) and the minimum mean square error (MMSE) estimator that are suitable to estimate the abovementioned channel model. Analytical results show that the proposed estimators achieve much better minimum possible Bayesian CramérRao lower bounds (CRLBs) in the frequencyselective Rician MIMO channels compared with those of Rayleigh one. It is seen that the SSLS channel estimator requires less knowledge about the channel and/or has better performance than the conventional least squares (LS) and MMSE estimators. Simulation results confirm the superiority of the proposed channel estimators. Finally, to estimate the channel Rice factor, an algorithm is proposed, and its efficiency is verified using the result in the SSLS and MMSE channel estimators.
Keywords
 Channel Estimation
 Minimum Mean Square Error
 Channel Estimator
 Channel Estimation Error
 Linear Minimum Mean Square Error
1. Introduction
In wireless communications, multipleinput multipleoutput (MIMO) systems provide substantial benefits in both increasing system capacity and improving its immunity to deep fading in the channel [1, 2]. To take advantage of these benefits, special spacetime coding techniques are used [3, 4]. In most previous research on the coding approaches for MIMO systems, however, the accurate channel state information (CSI) is required at the receiver and/or transmitter. Moreover, in the coherent receivers [1], channel equalizers [5], and transmit beamformers [6], the perfect knowledge of the channel is usually needed.
In the literature, three classes of methods for channel identification are presented. They include trainingbased channel estimation (TBCE) [7, 8], blind channel estimation (BCE) [9, 10], and semiblind channel estimation (SBCE) [11, 12]. Due to low complexity and better performance, TBCE is widely used in practice for quasistatic or slow fading channels, for instance, indoor MIMO channels. However, in outdoor MIMO channels where channels are under fast fading, the channel tracking and estimating algorithms as the Wiener least mean squares (WLMS) [13], the Kalman filter [14], recursive least squares (RLS) [15], generalized RLS (GRLS) [16], and generalized LMS (GLMS) [17] are used.
TBCE schemes can be optimal at high signaltonoise ratios ( ) [18]. Moreover, it is shown in [19] that at high , trainingbased capacity lower bounds coincide with the actual Shannon capacity of a block fading finite impulse response (FIR) channel. Nevertheless, at low SNRs, trainingbased schemes are suboptimal [18].
The optimal training signals are usually obtained by minimizing the channel estimation error. For MIMO flat fading channels, the design of optimal training sequences to satisfy the required semiunitary condition in the channel estimator error, given in [7, ], is straightforward. For instance, a properly normalized submatrix of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix has been used in [7] to estimate the Rayleigh flat fading MIMO channel. In this case, a Hadamard matrix can also be applied.
On the other hand, to estimate MIMO frequencyselective or MIMO intersymbol interference (ISI) channels, training sequences are designed considering a few aspects. For MIMO ISI channel estimation, training sequences should have both good autocorrelations and cross correlations. Furthermore, to separate the transmitted data and training symbols, one of the zeropadding (ZP) based guard period or cyclic prefix (CP) based guard period is inserted. In order to estimate the Rayleigh fading MIMO ISI channels, the delta sequence has been used in [20] as optimal training signal. This sequence satisfies the semiunitary condition in the mean square error (MSE) of channel estimator. However, it may result in high peak to average power ratio (PAPR) that is important in practical communication systems.
The optimal training sequences of [21–25] not only satisfy the semiunitary condition but also introduce good PAPR. In [21], a set of sequences with a zero correlation zone (ZCZ) is employed as optimal training signals. In [26–28], to find these sequence sets, some algorithms are presented. In [22], different phases of a perfect polyphase sequence such as the Frank sequence or Chu sequence are proposed. Furthermore, in [23–25], uncorrelated Golay complementary sets of polyphase sequences have been used. Since both ZCZ and perfect polyphase sequences have periodic correlation properties, the CPbased guard period is employed with them. On the other hand, uncorrelated Golay complementary sets of polyphase sequences have both aperiodic and periodic types that are used with ZP and CPbased guard periods, respectively.
Since all sequences under their conditions attain the same channel estimation error [25] and also our goal is not comparing them in this paper (this work is done in [24, 25]), we will use ZCZ sequences here.
In [25], the performance of the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) and linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) estimator is studied in the frequencyselective Rayleigh fading MIMO channel. It is observed that the LMMSE estimator has better performance than the BLUE, because it can employ statistical knowledge about the channel. Nevertheless, all estimators of [23–25] are optimal since they achieve the minimum possible classical (or Bayesian) CramérRao Lower Bound (CRLB) in the Rayleigh fading channels.
In most previous research on the MIMO channel estimation, the channel fading is assumed to be Rayleigh. In [29], the SLS and minimum mean square error (MMSE) estimators of [7] have been used to estimate the Rician fading MIMO channel. It is notable that these estimators are appropriate to estimate the Rayleigh fading channels, and hence the results of [29] are controversial. In [30], to estimate the channel matrix in the Rician fading MIMO systems, the MMSE estimator is analyzed. It is proved in [30] analytically that the MSE improves with the spatial correlation at both the transmitter and the receiver side. An interesting result in this paper is that the optimal training sequence length can be considerably smaller than the number of transmitter antennas in systems with strong spatial correlation.
In [31–33], the TBCE scheme is investigated in MIMO systems when the Rayleigh fading model is replaced by the more general Rician model. By the new methods of shifted scaled least squares (SSLS) and LMMSE channel estimators, it is shown that increasing the Rice factor improves the performance of channel estimation. In [31], it is assumed that the Rician fading channel has spatial correlation. It has also been shown that the error of the LMMSE channel estimator decreases when the Rice factor and/or the correlation coefficient increase.
In this paper, we extend the results of [31–33] in flat fading to the frequencyselective fading case. For channel estimator error, the new formulations are obtained so that in the special case where the channel has flat fading, the results reduce to the previous results in [31–33]. The substantial benefits of Rician fading model are investigated in the MIMO channel estimation. It is seen that Rician fading not only can increase the capacity of a MIMO system [2] but it also may be helpful for channel estimation. It is notable that the aforementioned channel model is suitable for suburban areas where a line of sight (LOS) path often exists. This may also be true for microcellular or picocellular systems with cells of less than several hundred meters in radius.
First, the traditional least squares (LS) method is probed. It is notable that for linear channel model with Gaussian noise, the maximum likelihood (ML), LS, and BLUE estimators are identical [34]. Simulation results show that the LS estimator achieves the minimum possible classical CRLB. Clearly, the performance of this estimator is independent of the Rice factor. Then, the SSLS and MMSE channel estimators are proposed. Simulation results show that these estimators attain their minimum possible Bayesian CRLBs. Furthermore, analytical and numerical results show that the performance of these estimators is improved when the Rice factor increases. It is also seen that in the frequencyselective Rician fading MIMO channels, the MMSE estimator outperforms the LS and SSLS estimators. However, it requires that both the power delay profile (PDP) of the channel and the receiver noise power as well as the Rice factor be known a priori. In general, the SSLS technique requires less knowledge about the channel statistics and/or has better performance than the LS and MMSE approaches.
Moreover, to estimate the channel Rice factor, we propose an algorithm which is important in practical usages of the proposed SSLS and MMSE estimators. In singleinput singleoutput (SISO) channels, different methods have been proposed for estimation of the Rice factor. In [35], the ML estimate of the Rice factor is obtained. In [36], a Rice factor estimation algorithm based on the probability distribution function (PDF) of the received signal is proposed. In [37–41], the momentbased methods are used for the Rice factor estimation. Besides, to estimate the Rice factor in low SNR environments, the phase information of received signal has been used in [42]. Moreover, in [43, 44], the Rice factor along with some other parameters is estimated in MIMO systems using weighted LS (WLS) and ML criteria.
In the abovementioned references, the channel Rice factor is estimated using the received signals. However, in this paper, we suggest an algorithm based on training signal and LS technique. Simulation results corroborate the good performance of this algorithm in channel estimation. In practice, such algorithms are required to identify the type of environment (Rayleigh or Rician) in several applications, for instance, adaptive modulation for MIMO antenna systems.
The next section describes the MIMO channel model underlying our framework and some assumptions on the fading process. The performance of the LS, SSLS, and MMSE estimators in the frequencyselective Rician fading MIMO channel estimation and optimal choice of training sequences are investigated in Sections 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Numerical examples and simulation results are presented in Section 6. Finally, concluding remarks are presented in Section 7.
Notation: is reserved for the matrix Hermitian, for the matrix inverse, for the matrix (vector) transpose, for the complex conjugate, for the Kronecker product, for the trace of a matrix, for the mean value of the elements in a matrix, for the mode value of the elements in a vector and for the absolute value of the complex number. stacks all the columns of its matrix argument into one tall column vector. is the mathematical expectation, denotes the identity matrix, and denotes the Frobenius norm.
2. Signal and Channel Models
We assume block transmission over block fading Rician MIMO channel with transmit and receive antennas. The frequencyselective fading subchannels between each pair of antenna elements are modeled by taps as , and . We suppose identical PDP as for all subchannels. Then, the taps of all the subchannels have the same power , that is, . It is also assumed unit power for each subchannel, that is, .
where and are the complex vector of received symbols on the antennas and the vector of transmitted training symbols on the antennas at symbol time , respectively. The vector in (1) is the complex additive noise at symbol time . The matrices constitute the taps of the multipath MIMO channel.
where . According to (4) and (5), the channel Rice factor can vary the mean value and the variance of the channel in the defined model.
Note that the latter one is written using (5).
The elements of H and noise matrix are independent of each other.
When , (12) reduces to the Rayleigh fading channel introduced in [24, 25].
3. LS Channel Estimator
For flat fading, , (19) is similar to that of [7]. In order to achieve the minimum error of (19), the training sequences should satisfy the semiunitary condition (18). Due to the structure of in (9), it means that the optimal training sequence in each antenna has to be orthogonal not only to its shifts within taps, but also to the training sequences in other antennas and their shifts within taps. Here, we consider the ZCZ sequences as optimal training signals without loss of generality.
From (21), holding constant, the minimum error of the LS estimator decreases when increases. On the other hand, holding constant, the minimum error of this estimator increases when increases.
This estimator obtains the minimum possible classical CRLB (21). However, the error of (21) is independent of the Rice factor. Clearly, the LS estimator cannot exploit any statistical knowledge about the frequencyselective Rayleigh or Rician fading MIMO channels. In the next sections, we derive new results in the frequencyselective Rician channel model by the proposed SSLS and MMSE estimators.
4. Shifted Scaled Least Squares Channel Estimator
This estimator offers a more significant improvement than the LS and SLS methods. However, from (28), it requires that and or equivalently the Rice factor as well as be known a priori. The required knowledge of the channel statistics can be estimated by some methods. For instance, the problem of estimating the MIMO channel covariance, based on limited amounts of training sequences, is treated in [47]. Moreover, in [48], the channel autocorrelation matrix estimation is performed by an instantaneous autocorrelation estimator that only one channel estimate (obtained by a very low complexity channel estimator) has been used as input.
From (30), it is seen that increasing SNR leads to increasing which is restricted by 1. Then, the SSLS estimator in (24) reduces to the LS estimator when . Moreover, decreasing the Rice factor to zero (which implies that and hence ) leads to increasing which is restricted by . Hence, the SSLS estimator in (24) reduces to the SLS estimator of [21] when . On the other hand, at or for (which implies that ), the SSLS estimator in (24) reduces to .
Generally speaking, the scaling factor in (24) is between 0 and 1. When the channel fading is weak ( or AWGN) or the transmitted power is small, that is, , the scaling factor . Also, when the channel fading is strong ( or Rayleigh) or the transmitted power is large, that is, , the scaling factor . Finally, in the Rician fading channel , we have .
5. MMSE Channel Estimator
Proof.
See the appendix.
Then, the SSLS and MMSE channel estimators are identical within the uniform PDP.
6. Simulation Results
Here, we denote a ZCZ set with length size and ZCZ length by In the following subsections, we present several numerical examples to illustrate both the superiority and reasonability of the proposed SSLS and MMSE channel estimators in the frequencyselective Rician fading models.
6.1. The Shorter Training Length to Estimate the Rician Fading Model
The sequences under test in Figures 1 through 3 are and sets [26]. It is notable that these results are obtained based on both the channel model and the channel Rice factor which are defined in Section 2.
6.2. Comparing the LSBased and MMSE Channel Estimators
Computational complexity of the LSbased and MMSE channel estimators .
Channel estimation algorithm  Number of real multiplications  Number of real additions  Matrix inverse operation 

LS, SLS 

 No 
SSLS 

 No 
MMSE ( = 0) 

 Yes 
General MMSE 

 Yes 
set.
= −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 −1 1 1 1 −1 −1 1 −1 −1 1 1 1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 −1 

1 1 1 1 1 −1 1 −1 1 1 1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 1 1 −1 
= −1 1 1 −1 −1 −1 1 1 −1 1 1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 1 −1 1 1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 
−1 −1 1 1 1 −1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 1 −1 1 1 1 1 1 
= −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 −1 1 1 1 1 1 −1 1 −1 1 1 1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 1 1 −1 1 1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 
1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 −1 1 1 1 −1 −1 1 −1 −1 1 1 1 −1 −1 1 
= −1 1 1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 −1 1 1 1 −1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 1 −1 1 1 1 1 1 −1 1 −1 1 1 −1 −1 −1 1 1 −1 1 
1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1 −1 1 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 
6.3. The Rician Fading Model with a Higher Number of Antennas
6.4. Increasing Rice Factor
6.5. Substantial Benefits of the Rician Fading MIMO Channels
Substantial benefits of Rician fading MIMO channel by using SSLS estimator .
N _{ T }  N _{ P }  SNR (dB)  κ  Normalized TMSE 

2  72  5  0  8.17 × 10^{2} 
2  72  −4.56  10  8.17 × 10^{2} 
2  40  5  10  6.02 × 10^{2} 
4  72  5  10  6.02 × 10^{2} 
Substantial benefits of Rician fading MIMO channel by using MMSE estimator .
N _{ T }  N _{ P }  SNR (dB)  κ  Normalized TMSE 

2  72  5  0  4.60 × 10^{2} 
2  72  −0.58  10  4.60 × 10^{2} 
2  40  5  10  3.46 × 10^{2} 
4  72  5  10  3.46 × 10^{2} 
It is generally true that the less the channel estimation error, the better the bit error rate (BER) performance for a fixed data detection scheme. The proposed methods can also guarantee the best BER performance for a given detection method.
6.6. A New Algorithm to Estimate the Rice Factor
The difference of the proposed estimators with the other estimators such as SLS of [7, 21] or LMMSE of [25] is that the performance of our proposed estimators can be improved because of exploiting the Rice factor, while the other methods cannot use this factor. In order to perform the proposed SSLS and MMSE channel estimators in the Rician fading MIMO channels, it is required that the channel Rice factor be known at the receiver. In this subsection, we propose an algorithm to estimate . This algorithm has the following steps.
Step 1.
Step 2.
Partition to where .
Step 3.
Step 4.
Step 5.
Step 6.
In simulation processes, it is seen that for some restricted values of , the estimated Rice factors in Step 5 deviate from the actual values of the Rice factor randomly (not shown). This event especially occurs at low SNRs and high values of . Step 6 is used to remove this deficiency. In this step, we use MATLAB FUNCTION (HIST and MAX) to calculate the mode value of the elements in vector . Hence, the accurate Rice factor can be obtained. It is assumed that the channel Rice factor is stable during the received consecutive blocks. It should be noted that the channel Rice factor estimator can be updated using a sliding window comprising N blocks, which would be useful in realtime estimation of .
7. Conclusion
In this paper, the performance of trainingbased channel estimators in the frequencyselective Rician fading MIMO channels is investigated. The conventional LS technique and proposed SSLS and MMSE approaches have been probed. The MMSE channel estimator has better performance among the tested estimators, but it requires more knowledge about the channel. For channels with uniform PDP or a lower number of taps, the SSLS estimator is acceptable. However, for nonuniform PDP with a higher number of taps, the MMSE channel estimator is required to attain a lower TMSE. In general, the SSLS technique provides a good tradeoff between the TMSE performance and the required knowledge about the channel. Moreover, the computational complexity of this estimator is lower than that of MMSE and near to that of LS estimator. Finally, we proposed an algorithm to estimate the channel Rice factor. Numerical results validate the good performance of this algorithm in Rician fading MIMO channel estimation.
The estimators suggested in this paper can be practically used in the design of MIMO systems. For instance, in order to obtain a given value of TMSE in the Rician channel model, either the required SNR may be decreased or the training length can be reduced. Then, resources will be saved. Besides, for the given values of the SNR, training length, and TMSE in the aforementioned channel model, the number of antennas can be increased. It is worthwhile to note that the excess of antenna numbers in MIMO systems leads to a higher capacity. It is also remarkable that the Rician fading is known as a more appropriate model for wireless environments with a dominant direct LOS path. This type of the fading model, especially in the microcellular mobile systems and LOS mode of WiMAX, is more suitable than the Rayleigh one.
Appendix
Declarations
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, in Islamshahr, Tehran, Iran. We would like to thank Dr. Masoud Esmaili, Faculty Member of Islamic Azad University for the selfless help he provided. Also, the authors would like to thank the reviewers for their very helpful comments and suggestions which have improved the presentation of the paper.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Tse D, Viswanath P: Fundamentals of Wireless Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2005.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Jayaweera SK, Poor HV: On the capacity of multipleantenna systems in Rician fading. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2005, 4(3):11021111.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Gershman AB, Sidiropoulos ND: SpaceTime Processing for MIMO Communications. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK; 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Zhang W, Xia XG, Letaief KB: Spacetime/frequency coding for MIMOOFDM in next generation broadband wireless systems. IEEE Wireless Communications 2007, 14(3):3243.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Zhang J, Zheng YR: Improved frequency domain channel estimation and equalization for MIMO wireless communications. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks 2009, 16(12):1221. 10.1007/s1077600900931View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Sadek AK, Su W, Liu KJR: Eigenselection approach for joint beamforming and spacefrequency coding in MIMOOFDM systems with spatial correlation feedback. Proceedings of the IEEE 6th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC '05), June 2005 565569.Google Scholar
 Biguesh M, Gershman AB: Trainingbased MIMO channel estimation: a study of estimator tradeoffs and optimal training signals. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2006, 54(3):884893.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Björnson E, Ottersten B: Trainingbased Bayesian MIMO channel and channel norm estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '09), April 2009, Taipei, Taiwan 27012704.Google Scholar
 Li T, Ling Q, Ding Z: Transmit delay structure design for blind channel estimation over multipath channels. Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2007, 2007:12.Google Scholar
 Sabri K, El Badaoui M, Guillet F, Adib A, Aboutajdine D: A frequency domainbased approach for blind MIMO system identification using secondorder cyclic statistics. Signal Processing 2009, 89(1):7786. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2008.07.011View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Khalighi MA, Bourennane S: Semiblind singlecarrier MIMO channel estimation using overlay pilots. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2008, 57(3):19511956.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Moghaddam SShirvani, Saremi H: A novel semiblind channel estimation scheme for Rayleigh flat fading MIMO channels (Joint LS estimation and ML detection). IETE Journal of Research 2010, 56(4):193201. 10.4103/03772063.70629View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Lindbom L, Sternad M, Ahlén A: Tracking of timevarying mobile radio channels—part I: the Wiener LMS algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Communications 2001, 49(12):22072217. 10.1109/26.974267View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Zhu J, Siyau MF, Loo KK: Channel tracking scheme using blockbased Kalman algorithm for MIMO wireless systems. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC '07), 2007, Helsinki, Finland 15.Google Scholar
 Karami E, Shiva M: Decisiondirected recursive least squares MIMO channels tracking. Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2006, 2006:10.Google Scholar
 Kho YH, Taylor DP: MIMO channel estimation and tracking based on polynomial prediction with application to equalization. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2008, 57(3):15851595.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kho YH, Taylor DP: Reduced complexity MIMO channel estimation and equalization using a polynomialpredictorbased vector GLMS algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC '07), 2007, Athens, Greece 15.Google Scholar
 Hassibi B, Hochwald BM: How much training is needed in multipleantenna wireless links? IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 2003, 49(4):951963. 10.1109/TIT.2003.809594View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Vikalo H, Hassibi B, Hochwald B, Kailath T: On the capacity of frequencyselective channels in trainingbased transmission schemes. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2004, 52(9):25722583. 10.1109/TSP.2004.832020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Ma X, Yang L, Giannakis GB: Optimal training for MIMO frequencyselective fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2005, 4(2):453466.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Yuan W, Wang P, Fan P: Performance of multipath MIMO channel estimation based on ZCZ training sequences. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Microwave, Antenna, Propagation and EMC Technologies for Wireless Communications (MAPE '05), August 2005, Beijing, China 15421545.Google Scholar
 Hwang JK, Chung RL, Tsai MF: Highly efficient sparse multipath channel estimator with optimal Chusequence preamble for MIMO frequencydomain DFE receiver. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT '06), August 2006, Vancouver, BC, Canada 755759.Google Scholar
 Wang S, Abdi A: Aperiodic complementary sets of sequencesbased MIMO frequency selective channel estimation. IEEE Communications Letters 2005, 9(10):891893. 10.1109/LCOMM.2005.10019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wang S, Abdi A: Lowcomplexity optimal estimation of MIMO ISI channels with binary training sequences. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2006, 13(11):657660.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wang S, Abdi A: MIMO ISI channel estimation using uncorrelated golay complementary sets of polyphase sequences. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2007, 56(5):30243039.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Yang SA, Wu J: Optimal binary training sequence design for multipleantenna systems over dispersive fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2002, 51(5):12711276. 10.1109/TVT.2002.800638View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Fan P, Mow WH: On optimal training sequence design for multipleantenna systems over dispersive fading channels and its extensions. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2004, 53(5):16231626. 10.1109/TVT.2004.833642View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Rathinakumar A, Chaturvedi AK: Mutually orthogonal sets of ZCZ sequences. Electronics Letters 2004, 40(18):11331134. 10.1049/el:20045628View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Liu X, Wang F, Bialkowski ME, Zhang H: Investigation into MIMO channel estimation performance under a doublebounce channel model. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC '08), December 2008, Macau, China 1.Google Scholar
 Bjornson E, Ottersten B: A framework for training based estimation in arbitrarily correlated Rician MIMO channels with Rician disturbance. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2010, 58(3):18071820.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Nooralizadeh H, Moghaddam SShirvani, Bakhshi HR: Optimal training sequences in MIMO channel estimation with spatially correlated rician flat fading. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA '09), December 2009, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 1: 227232.Google Scholar
 Nooralizadeh H, Moghaddam SShirvani: A new shifted scaled LS channel estimator for rician flat fading MIMO channel. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA '09), December 2009, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 1: 243247.Google Scholar
 Nooralizadeh H, Moghaddam SShirvani: A novel shifted type of SLS estimator for estimation of Rician flat fading MIMO channels. Signal Processing 2010, 90(6):18861893. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.12.009View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Kay SM: Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Volume I: Estimation Theory. PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA; 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
 Marzetta TL: EM algorithm for estimating the parameters of a multivariate complex Rician density for polarimetric SAR. Proceedings of the 1995 20th International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '95), May 1995, Detroit, MI, USA 5: 36513654.Google Scholar
 Sumanasena MAK, Evans BG, Tafazolli R: Rice factor estimation for mobile satellite adaptive air interface. Electronics Letters 2002, 38(7):339341. 10.1049/el:20020234View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Greenstein LJ, Michelson DG, Erceg V: Momentmethod estimation of the Ricean Kfactor. IEEE Communications Letters 1999, 3(6):175176. 10.1109/4234.769521View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Naimi A, Azemi G: K factor estimation in shadowed Ricean mobile communication channels. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2009, 9(10):13791386. 10.1002/wcm.725View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Tepedelenlioǧlu C, Abdi A, Giannakis GB: The Ricean K factor: estimation and performance analysis. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2003, 2(4):799810.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Abdi A, Tepedelenlioglu C, Kaveh M, Giannakis G: On the estimation of the K parameter for the rice fading distribution. IEEE Communications Letters 2001, 5(3):9294. 10.1109/4234.913150View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kong DQ, Liu ZX, Cui C, Jin JW: Ricean factor estimation and performance analysis. Proceedings of the International Forum on Computer ScienceTechnology and Applications (IFCSTA '09), 2009, Chongqing, China 3: 2730.Google Scholar
 Morabito AN, Percival DB, Sahr JD, Berkowitz ZMP, Vertatschitsch LE: Ricean parameter estimation using phase information in low SNR environments. IEEE Communications Letters 2008, 12(4):244246.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Sieskul BT, Kaiser T: On parameter estimation of ricean fading MIMO channel: Correlated signals and spatial scattering. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC '05), 2005, Berlin, Germany 1: 522526.Google Scholar
 Sieskul BT, Jitapunkul S: A MIMO parameter estimation model taking ricean fading channel and stochastically uncorrelated signals into account—part II: asymptotically efficient estimators. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference (CNSR '05), 2005, Halifax, NS, Canada 2005: 299304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Huang YJ, Chen BS: Decision feedback equalization of frequencyselective Rician fading channels. Signal Processing 1999, 76(2):117133. 10.1016/S01651684(99)000031View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Ciblat P, Bianchi P, Ghogho M: Optimal training for frequency offset estimation in correlatedrice frequencyselective channel. Proceedings of the IEEE 9th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC '08), July 2008, Recife, Brazil 610.Google Scholar
 Werner K, Jansson M: Estimating MIMO channel covariances from training data under the Kronecker model. Signal Processing 2009, 89(1):113. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2008.06.014View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Mehlführer C, Rupp M: Novel tapwise LMMSE channel estimation for MIMO WCDMA. Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM '08), December 2008, New Orleans, La, USA 43244328.Google Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.