 Research Article
 Open Access
 Published:
An Efficient Method for Proportional Differentiated Admission Control Implementation
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking volume 2011, Article number: 738386 (2011)
Abstract
The admission control mechanism inspired in the framework of proportional differentiated services has been investigated. The mechanism provides a predictable and controllable network service for realtime traffic in terms of blocking probability. Implementation of proportional differentiated admission control is a complicated computational problem. Previously, asymptotic assumptions have been used to simplify the problem, but it is unpractical for realworld applications. We improve previous solutions of the problem and offer an efficient nonasymptotic method for implementation of proportional differentiated admission control.
1. Introduction
Efficient implementation of admission control mechanisms is a key point for nextgeneration wireless network development. Actually, over the last few years an interrelation between pricing and admission control in QoSenabled networks has been intensively investigated. Call admission control can be utilized to derive optimal pricing for multiple service classes in wireless cellular networks [1]. Admission control policy inspired in the framework of proportional differentiated services [2] has been investigated in [3]. The proportional differentiated admission control (PDAC) provides a predictable and controllable network service for realtime traffic in terms of blocking probability. To define the mentioned service, proportional differentiated service equality has been considered and the PDAC problem has been formulated. The PDAC solution is defined by the inverse Erlang loss function. It requires complicated calculations. To reduce the complexity of the problem, an asymptotic approximation of the Erlang B formula [4] has been applied. However, even in this case, the simplified PDAC problem remains unsolved.
In this paper, we improve the previous results in [3] and withdraw the asymptotic assumptions of the used approximation. It means that for the desired accuracy of the approximate formula an offered load has to exceed a certain threshold. The concrete value of the threshold has been derived. Moreover, an explicit solution for the considered problem has been provided. Thus, we propose a method for practical implementation of the PDAC mechanism.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we give the problem statement. In Section 3, we first present a nonasymptotic approximation of the Erlang B formula. We then use it for a proportional differentiated admission control implementation and consider some alternative problem statements for an admission control policy. In Section 4, we present the results of numerous experiments with the proposed method. Section 5 is a brief conclusion.
2. Problem Statement
Let us consider the concept of admission control inspired in the framework of proportional differentiated services. In the above paper [3], whose notation we follow, PDAC problem is defined as
Here,

(i)
: is a number of traffic classes. ;

(ii)
: is the weight of class . This parameter reflects the traffic priority. By increasing the weight, we also increase the admittance priority of corresponding traffic class;

(iii)
: is the offered load of class traffic;

(iv)
, is an allotted partition of the link capacity, is a bandwidth requirement of class connections, and is the largest integer not greater than ;

(v)
: is the Erlang loss function, that is, under the assumptions of exponential arrivals and general session holding times [5], it is the blocking probability for traffic of class .
It needs to find taking into account known and the restriction imposed by given link capacity, :
Let us remark that variations of imply a discrete changing of the function . Hence, it is practicably impossible to provide the strict equality in (1). It is reasonable to replace (1) by an approximate equality as follows:
But, even in this case, the above problem is difficult and complex combinatorial problem. For its simplification, the following asymptotic approximation has been used [3]. If the capacity of link and the offered loads are increased together:
and , then the Erlang loss function
can be approximated by
Taking into account the PDAC problem, the authors of [3] consider the limiting regime when
and . Under these conditions, the asymptotic approximation of the Erlang B formula has been used and (1) has been replaced by simplified equations as follows:
In practice, the limited regime (7) is not appropriate. But the simplification (8) can be used without the conditions (7). Actually, the approximation (6) can be applied without the condition (4). We prove it below.
3. Offered Technique
3.1. Approximate Erlang B Formula
We assert that for the desired accuracy of the approximation (6) an offered load has to exceed a certain threshold. The concrete value of the threshold is given by the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
For any small , if
then
Proof.
Here and below, we use the following designation:
Assume that . First, we rewrite the Erlang B formula
Remark that
Taking into account properties of geometrical progression, we have
Hence
To prove the second inequality of the theorem, we use the following upper bound of the Erlang loss function [6]:
Transform this as follows:
It implies
We have . Hence,
Thus, for any such that
it follows that
From the inequality (20), we obtainthe condition (9).
The proof is completed.
Note that the approximate formula (6) can provide the required accuracy in the case of . Actually, if , then the required accuracy is reached for . Thus, the condition (9) is sufficient but not necessary. It guarantees the desired accuracy of the approximation for any small and .
3.2. PDAC Solution
Assume that the solution of the PDAC problem satisfies inequalities . Let us derive an analytical solution for the PDAC problem under the condition (8). Without reducing generality, assume that and . Indeed, if , then we define new weights . Thus, the condition (8) can be reformulated as follows:
According to the transitivity property, any solution of the PDAC problem under condition (8) is also a solution of the PDAC problem under condition (22). Therefore,
Using the equality (2), we get
where
Thus, the formulas (23)–(25) provide the implementation of proportional differentiated admission control.
It is clear that for some values , we can obtain in (24) or in (23). Therefore, the problem is unsolvable and PDAC implementation is impossible for the given parameters.
More precisely, if , then we have from (24)
Using the following equality:
we derive
From the inequality , we can write
Therefore,
By substituting the expressions (24) for the into (30), we get after some manipulations the following inequality:
Note that the problem (22) has been formulated under the condition
Actually, it implies
Thus, the region of acceptability for PDAC problem (22) is defined by
It follows from the theorem that the approximation (6) is applicable even for and any small if . In spite of this fact, the solution above cannot be useful for small values of the ratio . In this case, the loss function is sensitive to fractional part dropping under calculation . For example, if kb/s, , and we obtain kb/s, then the approximate value of the blocking probability is about 0.004. But and . Thus, the offered approximate formula is useful if the ratio is relatively large.
3.3. Alternative Problem Statements
Let be the number of channel assigned for class traffic, . Each class is characterized by a worstcase loss guarantee [7, 8].
Consider the following optimization problem:
Assume that for all . It is well known that the Erlang loss function is a decreasing function of [9], that is, if . Therefore, the optimal solution of the problem (35) satisfies the mentioned condition
If we designate , then we get
Thus, the optimization problem (35) is reduced to the problem (1).
Assume the approximation (6) is admissible. Therefore, the method from previous subsection is supposed to be used, but the optimal solution of the problem (35) can be computed by inverting the formula (36). Taking into account the approximation, we get
Note that in practice the solution is not usually integer; thus, it has to be as follows:
We now consider the optimization of routing in a network through the maximization of the revenue generated by the network. The optimal routing problem is formulated as
where is a fixed number of channels for class traffic and is a revenue rate of class traffic. Obviously, the Erlang loss function is an increasing function of . Therefore, the optimal solution of the problem (40), (41) satisfies the following condition:
Hence, the problem (40), (41) can be reduced to the problem (1) as well. Under the approximation, the optimal solution takes the form
and the maximal total revenue is
4. Performance Evaluation
Let us illustrate the approximation quality. The difference is plotted as a function of offered load in Figure 1. If the number of channel is relatively small then high accuracy of approximation is reached for heavy offered load. Let us remark that heavy offered load corresponds to high blocking probability. Generally, this situation is abnormal for general communication systems, but the blocking probability decreases if the number of channels increased relative accuracy . Let us designate . If the approximation (2) is admissible for then it is also admissible for any . In Figure 2, the behavior of losses function according to different is shown. Thus, the provided approximation is attractive for a performance measure of queuing systems with a large number of devices.
Next, we consider a numerical example to evaluate the quality of a PDAC implementation based on the proposed method. Assume that Mb/s, kb/s, . In average, there are 1000 channels per traffic class. Following the theorem above, we conclude that the blocking probability can be replaced by the approximation (6) with accuracy about 0.01. Using (23)–(25), find a solution of the simplified PDAC problem and calculate the blocking probability for the obtained values. The results are shown in the Table 1.
Note that Mb/s and three channels per 128 kb/s have not been used. We get
It is easy to see that
If , and other parameters are the same then
If an obtained accuracy is not enough, then the formulas (23)–(25) provide efficient first approximation for numerical methods.
5. Conclusion
In this paper, a simple nonasymptotic approximation for the Erlang B formula is considered. We find the sufficient condition when the approximation is relevant. The proposed result allows rejecting the previously used limited regime and considers the proportional differentiated admission control under finite network resources. Following this way, we get explicit formulas for PDAC problem. The proposed formulas deliver highperformance computing of network resources assignment under PDAC requirements. Thus, an efficient method for proportional differentiated admission control implementation has been provided.
References
 1.
Yilmaz O, Chen IR: Utilizing call admission control for pricing optimization of multiple service classes in wireless cellular networks. Computer Communications 2009, 32(2):317323. 10.1016/j.comcom.2008.11.001
 2.
Dovrolis C, Stiliadis D, Ramanathan P: Proportional differentiated services: delay differentiation and packet scheduling. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 2002, 10(1):1226. 10.1109/90.986503
 3.
Salles RM, Barria JA: Proportional differentiated admission control. IEEE Communications Letters 2004, 8(5):320322. 10.1109/LCOMM.2004.827384
 4.
Jagerman DL: Some properties of the Erlang loss function. Bell System Technical Journal 1974, 53(3):525551.
 5.
Bertsekas D, Gallager R: Data Networks. 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 1992.
 6.
Harrel A: Sharp bounds and simple approximations for the Erlang delay and loss formulas. Management Sciences 1988, 34(8):959972. 10.1287/mnsc.34.8.959
 7.
Christin N, Liebeherr J, Abdelzaher T: Enhancing classbased service architectures with adaptive rate allocation and dropping mechanisms. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 2007, 15(3):669682.
 8.
Koo J, Shakhov VV, Choo H: An Enhanced REDBased Scheme for Differentiated Loss Guarantees, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Volume 4238. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 2006.
 9.
Haring G, Marie R, Puigjaner R, Trivedi K: Loss formulas and their application to optimization for cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2001, 50(3):664673. 10.1109/25.933303
 10.
Shakhov VV: An efficient method for proportional differentiated admission control implementation. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multiple Access Communications (MACOM '10), September 2010, Barcelona, Spain 9197.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by MKE and MEST, Korean government, under ITRC NIPA2010(C109010210008), FTDP(20100020727), and PRCP(20100020210) through NRF, respectively. A preliminary version of this paper was presented at MACOM 2010, Spain (Barcelona) [10]. The present version includes additional mathematical and numerical results.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Shakhov, V., Choo, H. An Efficient Method for Proportional Differentiated Admission Control Implementation. J Wireless Com Network 2011, 738386 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/738386
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 Admission Control
 Asymptotic Approximation
 Blocking Probability
 Call Admission Control
 Limited Regime