Skip to content


  • Research Article
  • Open Access

An Implementation of Nonlinear Multiuser Detection in Rayleigh Fading Channel

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking20062006:045647

Received: 14 May 2005

Accepted: 6 February 2006

Published: 20 March 2006


A blind nonlinear interference cancellation receiver for code-division multiple-access- (CDMA-) based communication systems operating over Rayleigh flat-fading channels is proposed. The receiver which assumes knowledge of the signature waveforms of all the users is implemented in an asynchronous CDMA environment. Unlike the conventional MMSE receiver, the proposed blind ICA multiuser detector is shown to be robust without training sequences and with only knowledge of the signature waveforms. It has achieved nearly the same performance of the conventional training-based MMSE receiver. Several comparisons and experiments are performed based on examining BER performance in AWGN and Rayleigh fading in order to verify the validity of the proposed blind ICA multiuser detector.


  • Information System
  • Communication System
  • System Application
  • Training Sequence
  • Interference Cancellation


Authors’ Affiliations

School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Communications and Signal Processing Group, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK


  1. Honig M, Madhow U, Verdu S: Blind adaptive multiuser detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1995,41(4):944-960. 10.1109/18.391241View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Verdu S: Adaptive multiuser detection. Proceedings of IEEE 3rd International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications (IEEE ISSSTA '94), July 1994, Oulu, Finland 1: 43-50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Patel P, Holtzman J: Analysis of a simple successive interference cancellation scheme in a DS/CDMA system. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 1994,12(5):796-807. 10.1109/49.298053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kohno R, Hatori M, Imai H: Cancellation techniques of co-channel interference in asynchronous spread spectrum multiple access systems. Electronics and Communications in Japan 1983,66-A(5):20-29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. He P, Tjhung TT, Rasmussen LK: Constant modulus algorithm CMA for CDMA communications. Proceedings of 48th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '98), May 1998, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 2: 949-953.Google Scholar
  6. Samardzija D, Mandayam N, Seskar I: Blind successive interference cancellation for DS-CDMA systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications 2002,50(2):276-290. 10.1109/26.983323View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Ristaniemi T, Joutsensalo J: Advanced ICA-based receivers for block fading DS-CDMA channels. Signal Processing 2002,82(3):417-431. 10.1016/S0165-1684(01)00194-3View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyvarinen A, Oja E: A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Computation 1997,9(7):1483-1492. 10.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1483View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang X-D, Wei W: Blind adaptive multiuser detection based on Kalman filtering. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2002,50(1):87-95. 10.1109/78.972485MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Verdu S: Multiuser detection. In Code-Division Multiple-Access Channels. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2001. chapter 2Google Scholar
  11. Hyvarinen A, Oja E: Independent component analysis: a tutorial. Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland; April 1999.Google Scholar
  12. Comon P: Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Processing 1994,36(3):287-314. Special issue on Higher-Order Statistics 10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Delic H, Hocanin A: Robust detection in DS-CDMA. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2002,51(1):155-170. 10.1109/25.992076View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Buzzi S, Lops M, Vincent Poor H: Code-aided interference suppression for DS/CDMA overlay systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 2002,90(3):394-435. 10.1109/5.993406View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyvarinen A, Karhunen J, Oja E: Independent Component Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Toronto, Canada; 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Amari S-I: Natural gradient works efficiently in learning. Neural Computation 1998,10(2):251-276. 10.1162/089976698300017746MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Coifman RR, Donoho DL: Translation-invariant de-noising. Yale University and Stanford University, New Haven, Conn, USA; 1995.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hyvarinen A, Karhunen J, Oja E: Principal component analysis and whitening. In Independent Component Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 2001:125-144.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Amari S-I: Stability analysis of adaptive blind source separation. 1997.Google Scholar


© Wai Yie Leong et al. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.