Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research Article
  • Open Access

Analog-Digital Partitioning for Low-Power UWB Impulse Radios under CMOS Scaling

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2, 3,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2, 3 and
  • 2
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking20072006:072430

https://doi.org/10.1155/WCN/2006/72430

  • Received: 2 September 2005
  • Accepted: 11 December 2006
  • Published:

Abstract

Ultra-wideband (UWB) impulse radios show strong advantages for the implementation of low-power transceivers. In this paper, we analyze the impact of CMOS technology scaling on power consumption of UWB impulse radios. It is shown that the power consumption of the synchronization constitutes a large portion of the total power in the receiver. A traditional technique to reduce the power consumption at the receiver is to operate the UWB radios with a very low duty cycle on an architecture with extreme parallelism. On the other hand, this requires more silicon area and this is limited by the leakage power consumption, which becomes more and more a problem in future CMOS technologies. The proposed quantitative framework allows systematic use of digital low-power design techniques in future UWB transceivers.

Keywords

  • Power Consumption
  • Duty Cycle
  • Total Power
  • Traditional Technique
  • CMOS Technology

[1234567891011121314]

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
AMI Semiconductor, 1804 Vilvoorde, Belgium
(2)
IMEC, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
(3)
Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

References

  1. IEEE 802.15.4a http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG4a.html
  2. Yang L, Giannakis GB: Ultra-wideband communications: an idea whose time has come. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2004,21(6):26-54. 10.1109/MSP.2004.1359140View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Blázquez R, Lee F, Wentzloff D, Ginsburg B, Powell J, Chandrakasan A: Direct conversion pulsed UWB transceiver architecture. Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE '05), March 2005, Munich, Germany 3: 94-95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. O'Donnell ID, Brodersen RW: An ultra-wideband transceiver architecture for low power, low rate, wireless systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2005,54(5):1623-1631. 10.1109/TVT.2005.854021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Verhelst M, Dehaene W: System design of an ultra-low power, low data rate, pulsed UWB receiver in the 0-960 MHz band. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '05), May 2005, Seoul, South Korea 4: 2812-2817.Google Scholar
  6. Ryckaert J, Badaroglu M, Desset C, et al.: Carrier-based UWB impulse radio: simplicity, flexibility, and pulser implementation in 180 nm CMOS. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband (ICU '05), September 2005, Zurich, Switzerland 432-437.Google Scholar
  7. Ryckaert J, Badaroglu M, De Heyn V, et al.:A 16mA UWB 3-to-5GHz 20MPulses/s quadrature analog correlation receiver in 0.18 m CMOS. Proceedings of IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, February 2006, San Francisco Marriott, Calif, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Desset C, Badaroglu M, Ryckaert J, Van Poucke B: UWB search strategies for minimal-length preamble and a low-complexity analog receiver. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances for Wireless Communication (SPAWC '06), July 2006, Cannes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  9. Wu C-S, Wu A-Y: Modified vector rotational CORDIC (MVR-CORDIC) algorithm and architecture. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing 2001,48(6):548-561. 10.1109/82.943326View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo C, Zhong LC, Rabaey JM: Low power distributed MAC for ad hoc sensor radio networks. Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM '01), 2001, San Antonio, Tex, USA 5: 2944-2948.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. ITRS 2004 Edition http://public.itrs.net
  12. Brederlow R, Weber W, Sauerer J, Donnay S, Wambacq P, Vertregt M: A mixed-signal design roadmap. IEEE Design and Test of Computers 2001,18(6):34-46. 10.1109/54.970422View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Blazquez R, Newaskar PP, Lee FS, Chandrakasan AP: A baseband processor for impulse ultra-wideband communications. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 2005,40(9):1821-1828.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fort A, Desset C, Wambacq P, Van Biesen L: Body area UWB RAKE receiver communication. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '06), June 2006, Istanbul, Turkey 10: 4682-4687.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement