- Open Access
Call admission control with heterogeneous mobile stations in cellular/WLAN interworking systems
© Lim et al; licensee Springer. 2011
- Received: 26 February 2011
- Accepted: 6 September 2011
- Published: 6 September 2011
Although different call admission control (CAC) schemes have been proposed for cellular-wireless local area network (WLAN) interworking systems, no studies consider mobile stations (MSs) only with a single interface (for either WLANs or cellular networks) and thus these MSs will experience higher call blocking and dropping probabilities. In this article, we propose a new CAC scheme that considers both the MSs with a single interface and with dual interfaces. By employing the concept of guard-bands, the proposed CAC scheme gives higher priority to MSs with a single interface than those with dual interfaces to accommodate more MSs. The call blocking and dropping probabilities are analyzed using Markov chains and how to determine appropriate guard bands for CAC is investigated through cost minimization problems. Analytical and simulation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme can achieve lower blocking probabilities compared with existing schemes that do not include single interface MSs.
- call admission control
- heterogeneous mobile stations
- performance analysis
Recently, different types of wireless networks, such as cellular networks, worldwide interoperability for microwave access (WiMAX), and wireless local area networks (WLANs), have widely been deployed. These wireless networks have quite different characteristics; for instance, cellular networks provide ubiquitous coverage with low bandwidth whereas WLANs provide high data rates at cheap cost but can only provide lower mobility. In fact, none of these wireless networks can satisfy the wide ranging requirements from diverse users and this is the key motivation for integrating these heterogeneous wireless networks for providing users with the best connectivity (ABC) at all times .
Extensive work has been done in the integration of heterogeneous networks [2–9] and to allow seamless mobility across these heterogeneous networks (i.e., vertical handoff), two integration architectures, having both tightly coupled and loosely coupled architectures, have been introduced in [2, 3]. In [4, 5], vertical handover decisions where an mobile station (MS) selects the most appropriate network to avoid unnecessary handovers and wastages of resource have been proposed. The resource allocation in heterogeneous wireless networks has been investigated in [6–9]; the study in  investigates the admission control strategies for the data traffic in a hierarchical system consisting of macrocell and microcell layers; the authors of  introduce the first WLAN scheme and analyze its performance; Song et al.  determine an admission control scheme in which MSs try to access networks with specific probabilities for the maximum number of users; and Stevens-Navarro et al.  introduce an admission control scheme for multi-services. In these previous studies, it is assumed that all MSs have dual interfaces to cellular/WLAN systems and they can access both systems even though it is obvious that some MSs have only one interface, either cellular or WLAN. Therefore, the existing call admission control (CAC) schemes may lead to an "unfair" situation because they treat single- and dual-interface MSs equally. Specifically, WLAN-only and cellular-only MSs can be admitted to only WLAN and cellular networks, respectively, and therefore they experience higher call blocking/dropping probabilities than MSs with dual interfaces. Consequently, it is necessary to give higher priority to WLAN-only or cellular-only MSs for CAC in cellular/WLAN systems.
In this article, a new CAC scheme is proposed that considers heterogeneous types of MSs. In the proposed scheme, a well-known guard channel scheme is examined to give high priority to both the handover MSs and the single interfaced MSs. For performance evaluation, analytical models based on Markov chains are developed to analyze the call blocking and the call dropping probabilities. Furthermore, the optimal allocation of the guard channels is investigated by formulating cost minimization problems. Analytical and simulation results are presented which demonstrate that the new proposed scheme can achieve lower call blocking and call dropping probabilities than existing schemes because cellular- or WLAN-only MSs have higher priorities than the dual-interfaced MSs.
The rest of the article is organized as follows. Sections 2 and 3 describe the system model and the proposed CAC scheme considering heterogeneous MSs. Section 4 analyzes the performance of the CAC scheme through Markov chains. Section 5 presents numerical results and Section 6 describes the main conclusions from the research presented in the article.
Summary of notations
Mean arrival rate of new WLAN-only calls in a double coverage area
Mean arrival rate of new cellular-only calls in a double coverage area
Mean arrival rate of new cellular-only calls in a cellular only area
Mean arrival rate of new dual access calls in a double coverage area
Mean arrival rate of new dual access calls in a cellular only area
Mean arrival rate of horizontal handoff dual access calls
Mean arrival rate of horizontal handoff cellular only calls
Mean arrival rate of upward vertical handoff calls
Mean arrival rate of downward vertical handoff calls
Residence time in a double coverage area
Residence time in a cellular only area
Probability of a user moving from a cellular only area to a double coverage area
Probability of a user moving from a cellular only area to a neighbor cellular only area
Cell residence time of dual access calls accepted by the cellular network in a double coverage area
Cell residence time of cellular only calls accepted by the cellular network in a double coverage area
Cell residence time of cellular only calls accepted by the cellular network in a cellular only area
We consider three types of MSs, namely, WLAN-only, cellular-only, and dual-interfaced MSs. A WLAN-only MS has only a WLAN radio interface and the calls from the WLAN-only MS (i.e., WLAN-only calls) cannot be serviced in the cellular only area. On the other hand, a cellular-only MS has only a cellular radio interface and the calls originated from the cellular-only MS (i.e., cellular-only calls) can be accepted only by the cellular network even in double coverage areas. A dual-interfaced MS with WLAN and cellular interfaces can clearly access both the WLAN and the cellular network interfaces in the double coverage areas. Hence, we refer to the calls from dual-interfaced MSs as dual access calls. Also, we assume that dual-interfaced MSs can be accepted only in either the WLAN or the cellular network at a time, that is, we do not consider that the dual-interfaced MSs simultaneously use both networks for traffics. To consider these heterogeneous types of MSs, call requests need to be classified into WLAN-only calls, cellular-only calls, and dual access calls. In the proposed scheme, it is assumed that the types of MSs are provisioned to a certain server such as home location register (HLR) and the CAC entity can obtain the types of MSs from the server or the types of MSs can be queried to MSs on receiving call requests. Throughout this article, 'c', 'w', and 'wc' stand for cellular-only, WLAN-only, and dual access calls, respectively.
Figure 1 illustrates the call arrival rates and the handoff rates in different areas. In this article, all call arrivals are assumed to follow Poisson distributions. We do not consider handoffs between two WLANs due to sparse deployments of WLANs, and therefore there exists only new calls from WLAN-only MSs whose arrival rates are denoted as . New calls from cellular-only MSs can be generated in a double coverage area or a cellular only area, and their arrival rates are given by and , respectively. On the other hand, the handoff rate of cellular-only MSs is denoted by . A dual-interfaced MS can generate new calls in a double coverage area and in a cellular only area, and the arrival rates are given by and , respectively. The horizontal handoff rate between two cells is , whereas the vertical handoff rates from a WLAN to a cellular network (upward vertical handoff) and from a cellular network to a WLAN (downward vertical handoff) are denoted by , and , respectively.
We adopt the non-uniform mobility model within a single cell as in  where users in double coverage and cellular only areas have different mobility behaviors since WLAN hotspots are usually deployed in indoor environments and thus the users in the double coverage area have low mobility. Specifically, the residence time in the double coverage area, Tdca, is assumed to follow an exponential distribution with mean 1/ηdca. On the other hand, the residence time in the cellular only area, Tcoa, has an exponential distribution with mean 1/ηcoa. As illustrated in Figure 2, the MSs moving out the WLAN coverage enter the cellular-only area. The MSs moving out of the cellular-only area can enter the double coverage area with probability pcoa→dca, whereas they move to neighbor cells with the probability pcoa→coa . The MS entering the double coverage area from the cellular only area can move to cellular-only areas later.
We assume that the call duration T v follows an exponential distribution with mean 1/μ v [7–9]. Since the call duration time and cell residence time are independent, the WLAN channel holding time of a WLAN-only call and a dual access call accepted in the WLAN can be obtained as min(T v , Tdca). Similarly, the channel holding times of cellular-only calls originated in the double coverage area and in the cellular-only area are given by min(T v , ) and min(T v , ), respectively. The cellular channel holding times of dual access calls accepted by the cellular networks in the double coverage area and in the cellular-only area are obtained from min(T v , ) and min(T v , ), respectively.
In this section, we first introduce the motivation of the proposed call admission scheme. After that, the voice call capacities of WLANs and cellular networks are derived, and a CAC scheme with guard channels is proposed.
WLAN-only MSs cannot retry to the cellular network even though their call requests to the WLAN are blocked while dual-interfaced MSs in the double coverage areas can retry the cellular network. Therefore, it is necessary to assign higher priority to call requests from WLAN-only MSs to avoid unfairly higher blocking/dropping of the WLAN-only calls. Similar to the WLAN-only calls, cellular-only calls can access only the cellular networks, while dual-interfaced MSs have chances to access the WLAN in the double coverage area if their call requests to the cellular network are blocked. Dual-interfaced MSs try first the WLAN in the double coverage area to utilize the larger bandwidth of the WLAN. In addition, in the WLAN, vertical handoff calls have higher priority than new calls (e.g., WLAN-only or dual access calls) since the vertical handoff call dropping causes significant degradation in user satisfaction.
On the other hand, in the cellular network, dual access calls in the cellular-only area, cellular-only calls, horizontal handoff calls, and upward vertical handoff calls all compete for the same resource in the cellular network. We categorize these calls into (1) new calls including dual access calls blocked in the WLAN, (2) horizontal handoff, and (3) vertical handoff calls from the WLAN to the cellular networks. Dual access calls in the cellular-only area, cellular-only calls, and dual access calls blocked in the WLAN are eventually blocked if they are blocked in the cellular networks. Hence, these calls are classified into the same category. Upward vertical handoff calls are treated with the highest priority because of similar reasons with downward vertical handoff calls. Horizontal handoff calls have medium priorities since the dropping of these calls causes degradation in user satisfaction but horizontal handoffs do not need more signaling messages than vertical handoffs.
3.2. Voice capacity of WLANs
where τMS and τAP are the transmission probabilities of the MS and the AP, respectively, and the ρAP and ρMS are the queue utilizations of the AP and MS, respectively. From Equations 1 and 2, the maximum number of voice calls when ρAP and ρMS are less than 1 (i.e., voice capacity Cw) can be obtained.
3.3. Voice capacity of the cellular network
where Nup, iup, W, , R j , and v j are the number of users in the own cell, the uplink other-to-own cell interference ratio, the chip rate, of the j th user, the bit rate, and voice activity factor, respectively. Under the constraint of ηUL ≤ 1, the uplink voice capacity can be determined.
where Ndown, α i , PCCH, P N , L i , and are the number of downlink users in their own cell, the orthogonal factor of the cell, the power required for common channel, the noise power, the path loss, and the average downlink other-to-own cell interference ratio, respectively. For a given PTOT, the downlink voice capacity can be determined.
3.4. CAC with guard channels
For the purpose of performance evaluation, we analyze call dropping and blocking probabilities. To this end, we formulate the proposed scheme using Markov chains. The state of a WLAN is described as a row vector where and are the numbers of dual access and WLAN-only calls in the WLAN, respectively. Similarly, the state of a cell can be described by a row vector where and are the number dual access calls and cellular-only calls in the cell, respectively. In this section, arrival rates of new calls in each system, handoff rates, and departure rate are first described. Using these rates, Markov chains are constructed. Then, a method to solve these chains is introduced. Eventually, the guard band optimization scheme is described.
4.1 Arrival rates in the WLAN
where and are the indicator functions for new calls in the dual access area and vertical handoff calls from the cell to the WLAN, respectively, i.e., and represent as and , respectively.
where is the indicator function for the WLAN-only calls and it equals to .
4.2. Arrival rates in the cellular network
where N c is a threshold value up to which a call is allowed join the network.
where , , and are the indicator functions for dual access calls, horizontal handoff calls, and vertical handoff calls, respectively. They are given by , , and , respectively.
where and are the indicator functions for new cellular only calls and horizontal handoff calls and they are obtained as and , respectively.
4.3. Horizontal and vertical handoff rates
where the first and the second terms on the right-hand side mean the accepted new dual access and vertical handoff calls from a cellular to a WLAN, respectively, and is obtained as .
where ,,,..., are the Laplace transforms of random variables , X0, X1, ..., Xk, respectively.
4.4. Departure rates
where is the Laplace transformation of .
Both dual access and WLAN-only calls accepted in the WLAN will release their channels when they move out the WLAN coverage or they are terminated. Therefore, by Equation 21, the departure rates of dual access and WLAN-only calls, denoted by and , respectively, can be expressed as .
where and .
Similar to the cellular-only calls, the average departure rate, , for dual access calls is used and it is computed as , where and are the ratios of dual access accepted in the double coverage area and in the cellular-only area. These ratios are obtained from
where ,,, and .
4.5. State diagrams for WLANs and cellular networks
- (2), if
- (4), if
- (5), if
- (8), if
- (10), if
- (11), if
4.6. Iterative methods for computing steady-state probabilities
After obtaining the arrival and the departure rates, we need to compute the steady-states and . However, the states of the WLAN and the cellular networks are not independent due to the retrials of dual access calls blocked in WLANs and vertical handoffs. Hence, we use an iterative approach in which one-step results for one network are used for inputs for obtaining the steady states in another network . The detailed algorithms are as follows:
1: Set initial ε
2: Set initial values as follows
All blocking probabilities in Equations 4-7 and 10-14 = 0,
Compute all the steady-state probability, , by solving global balance equations through
Obtain new blocking probabilities
Update blocking probabilities
Compute all the state probabilities by solving global balance equation using equations through
Obtain the new blocking probabilities
Update the blocking probabilities
4.7. Optimization problem
In this section, we present analytical and simulation results of the proposed scheme compared with the WLAN-first scheme  that has guard bands for horizontal handoff and vertical handoff calls. For the simulations, Matlab 7.0 is used. It is notes that the WLAN-first scheme does not consider single-interfaced MSs.
To determine the voice capacity of the WLAN, we assume G.711 codec with a sampling rate of 20 ms, which generates voice packets of 80 bytes. Then, based on the description in Section 3.2, the voice capacity is given by 11 calls. On the other hand, for the voice capacity in cellular networks, the power of the base station P TOT and the power of the common channel P CCH are set to 20 and 3.6 W, respectively. In addition, the chip rate, W, is 3.84 Mcps and the voice data rate is assumed as 12.2 kbps with the adaptive multi-rate (AMR) codec. The values of for uplink and downlink are set to 5.9 and 7.4 dB, respectively. The voice activity is 50%, which leads the physical layer activity factor of 67% in uplink and 58% in downlink. The downlink orthogonality is 0.5 and other-cell to own-cell interference ratio is 0.65 . Based on these parameters, the voice capacity of a cell, Cc, is set to 70. Based on , the mobility-related parameters have the following values: 1/η co = 10 min, 1/η dc = 14 min, pcoa→dca = 0.24, and pcoa→coa = 0.76.
5.1. Proposed scheme versus WLAN-first scheme
We first analyze the call blocking probabilities when = 6, = 9, = 60, and = 65. It is noted that the blocking probability of WLAN-only calls can be computed by considering only blocking in the WLAN. On the contrary, dual access calls are blocked when they are blocked in both the WLAN and the cellular network.
5.2. Guard band optimization
We use 1, 7, and 10 for the values of the weighting factors, α n , α hh , and α vh for the optimization problems, respectively. The weighting factor for vertical handoff calls with the highest priority is set to be 10 and that for horizontal handoff calls is set to 7, since these calls have lower priority than vertical handoff calls.
In this article, we propose a voice CAC scheme that considers heterogeneous MSs with WLAN-only, cellular only, and both interfaces in cellular/WLAN-integrated networks. The proposed scheme gives higher priority to the MSs with a single interface than MSs with dual interfaces by allocating a separate guard band for the MSs with a single interface. We analyze the performance of the proposed CAC scheme by means of Markov chains. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed scheme achieves lower blocking probabilities than the WLAN-first scheme. Admission control for multi-service with heterogeneous MSs remains for further study.
This study was supported in part by the MKE, Korea, under the ITRC support program supervised by the NIPA (NIPA-2011-(C1090-1011-0004)), in part by the KCC, Korea, under the R&D program supervised by the KCA (KCA-2011-10913-0500), and in part by the WCU Project (R33-2008-000-10044-0), and in part by the Basic Research Program (2009-0064397) through the NRF funded by the MEST, Korea.
- Gustafsson E, Jonsson A: Always best connected. IEEE Wirel Commun 2003, 10(2):49-55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Varma V, Ramesh S, Wong K, Friedhoffer J: Mobility management in integrated UMTS/WLAN networks. Proc IEEE ICC 2003, 1048-1053.Google Scholar
- Buddhikot M, Chandranmenon G, Han S, Lee Y, Miller S, Salgarelli L: Design and implementation of a WLAN/CDMA2000 internetworking architecture. IEEE Commun Mag 2003, 41(11):90-100. 10.1109/MCOM.2003.1244928View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo Chunanxioung, Guo Zhihua, Zhang Qian, Zhu Wenwu: A seamless and proactive end-to-end mobility solution for roaming across heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2004, 22(5):834-848. 10.1109/JSAC.2004.826921View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McNair Janise, Zhu Fang: Vertical handoffs in fourth-generation multinetwork environments. IEEE Wirel Commun 2004, 11(3):8-15. 10.1109/MWC.2004.1308935View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klein ThierryE, Han Seung-Jae: Assignment strategies for mobile data users in hierarchical overlay networks: performance of optimal and adaptive strategies. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2004, 22(5):849-861. 10.1109/JSAC.2004.826922View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song Wei, Jiang Hai, Zhuang Weihua: Performance analysis of the WLAN-first scheme in cellular/WLAN interworking. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2007, 6(5):1932-1952.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song W, Cheng Y, Zhuang W: Improving voice and data services in cellular/WLAN integrated networks by admission control. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2007, 6(11):4025-4037.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stevens-Navarro E, Hamed Mohesnian-Rad A, Wong VWS: Connection admission control for multi-service integrated cellular/WLAN system. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2008, 57(6):3789-3800.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cai LX, (Sherman) Shen X, Mark JW, Cai L, Xiao Y: Voice capacity analysis of WLAN with unbalanced traffic. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2006, 55(3):752-761. 10.1109/TVT.2006.874145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holma H, Toskala A: WCDMA for UMTS. 3rd edition. Wiley; 2004.Google Scholar
- Fang Y: Modeling and performance analysis for wireless mobile networks: a new analytical approach. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 2005, 13(5):989-1002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blum C, Roli A: Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Comput Surv 2003, 35(3):268-308. 10.1145/937503.937505View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.