Protection of primary users in dynamically varying radio environment: practical solutions and challenges

3.1 State-of-art techniques for OOB radiation reduction

The simplest method for achieving OOB interference reduction is to reserve a number of edge (guard) subcarriers (GS) to serve as a spectral buffer between PU and SU transmissions [7], i.e., deactivation of subcarriers. Although simple to implement, this method significantly decreases the spectral efficiency and does not provide sufficient OOB interference reduction in most scenarios.

Another approach to the OOB power reduction of an OFDM signal is to spectrally shape each individual subcarrier spectrum [7]. We will discuss this simple method called windowing (W) in the following subsection in greater detail. In the adaptive symbol transition (AST) method [11], similar to W, the time-domain samples in the transition region between consecutive symbols are chosen adaptively in order to minimize the OOB power. For the AST algorithm, the information about symbols mapped to each subcarrier is needed in order to assess the amount of OOB interference in the neighboring frequency bands. A mean-square-error (MSE) minimization method is used to determine the values of the time-domain samples in the transition region. The primary drawbacks of this method are high computational complexity and reduced throughput.

Another method, called constellation expansion (CE) [12], adjusts the modulated data symbols transmitted per subcarrier such that the OOB interference can be reduced while simultaneously not losing any data information or causing distortion. This is achieved by enlarging the modulation constellation and by allowing data symbols to be represented by any one of the two constellation points. As a result, the minimum distance between the constellation points is reduced, and the bit-error-rate (BER) performance decreases.

Another method, called subcarriers weighting (SW) [13, 14], minimizes the signal OOB interference level by multiplying the data subcarriers by optimized real weighting coefficients. At the receiver, data symbols transmitted using the weighted subcarriers can be viewed as distorted, particularly for the high values of the weighting coefficients. Consequently, the authors suggest to impose a constraint on the weighting coefficients values. Simulation results exhibit significant OOB interference suppression. Some modifications to this method have been made in [15], where maximization of the channel capacity combined with OOB interference mitigation is addressed.

In the multiple-choice sequences (MCS) [16] method, for each sequence of data symbols to be transmitted in an OFDM symbol, a set of corresponding sequences representing it is calculated. The sequence yielding the lowest interference to adjacent bands is then chosen from this set and transmitted. To retrieve the initial data sequence at the receiver the identification number of the selected sequence has to be provided, what requires additional control channel for this side-information. A variant of the MCS method with reduced computational complexity is presented in [17]. In this method, the corresponding sequences are generated through the data symbols phases rotation of the multiple of π/ 2, and thus a limited number of possible sets of sequences must be examined to choose the optimum one. As the OFDM edge subcarriers possess the strongest influence on the OOB radiation, only those subcarriers are altered. Another variant of the MCS method involves its merging with other spectrum shaping algorithms, e.g., in [18] the authors combined the MCS method with both SW and CCs method.

Polynomial cancellation coding (PCC) has been proposed in [19] and revisited in [20]. This method not only reduces the OOB radiation but also lowers the OFDM signal sensitivity to phase and frequency errors. As neighboring subcarriers have firmly aligned spectra, the adjacent subcarriers are modulated with the same, appropriately scaled data symbol in order to reduce the sidelobes power. This is usually done for groups of two or three subcarriers. Although this method reduces the system throughput, this effect can be weakened as the cyclic prefix (CP) does not have to be added and coded redundancy can be used to increase SNR.

Another method for achieving OOB interference reduction, called spectral precoding (SP), has been described in [21, 22]. In this method, the correlation between the data-symbols transmitted on subcarriers is introduced by block-coding. The code-generating matrix is chosen so as to minimize the OOB radiation power. The SP method provides the lowest OOB interference levels relative to other methods simulated in [21]. On the other hand, it has been observed that the OOB interference suppression is not so high when the CP is applied.

Another method for reducing OOB interference, called extended active interference cancellation (EAIC) [23], is based on the insertion of special carriers that are designed to negatively combine with high-power sidelobes caused by the data subcarriers. The AIC subcarriers can be placed inside the adjacent transmission spectrum, usually at frequency locations that are non-orthogonal to the SU data subcarriers. The main drawback of this method results from this lack of orthogonality and thus, data symbols distortion. A variant of the EAIC method was presented in [24], where the sidelobe suppression approach was improved by using a long time-domain cancellation signal spanning over a number of consecutive OFDM symbols. This method results in an increase of BER due to increased interference relative to the method presented in [23]. In [25], this method is improved by introducing the constraint on the self-interference power level.

An interesting approach to the mitigation of OOB interference, called partial response signaling (PRS) [26], makes the values on each subcarrier dependent on the subsequent OFDM symbols. This can be done by independent lowpass filters on each input of the inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) block. Although relatively substantial OOB interference suppression can be achieved even with very low order (2-3) filters, the reception of such a signal requires either a slicer or a Viterbi detector when treating PRS filtering after being influenced by the multipath propagation channel.

An observation that the OOB radiation is the result of the time domain non-continuity between subsequent OFDM symbols was the basis for a spectrum shaping method presented in [27]. This method is called N-continuous OFDM (NC). The continuity of 0th to N th-order derivatives at the ends of the OFDM symbols is achieved by adding low power, complex-valued quantities to each active data subcarrier at the input of a IFFT block.

An entire class of methods that support the protection of PU signals from the effects of OOB interference is based on the use of power allocation schemes that not only maximize the throughput but also reduce the OOB interference power, e.g., refer to methods presented in [2, 28, 29]. However, as these approaches might be seen as part of radio resources management they will not be investigated here further.

Finally, the concept of modulated filterbanks (MFB) can be also successfully applied to suppress the sidelobes of the OFDM transmission [30]. MFB can be used for sidelobe suppression by applying them over the OFDM spectrum such that the series of bandpass filters allows only the required spectrum to pass through it while rejecting the unwanted OOB radiations in every subband.

3.2 Windowing

Windowing (W) is usually applied to the OFDM symbol time-domain samples with CP. The use of windowing is shown in Figure 1. The time-domain OFDM symbol of duration N + N_CP samples, where N_CP is the duration in samples of the CP, is extended cyclically with β samples at the end of the considered symbol. This extension is referred to as the cyclic suffix (CS). If we denote the time-domain signal for a single OFDM symbol as a vector $\mathbf{x}=\left\{x_{-\beta -N_{\text{CP}}},\dots ,x_{N-1+\beta }\right\}$, the OFDM-symbol time-domain samples are defined by vector y= {y _k }, which results from the multiplication of the vector x = {x _k } by the window shape w = {w _k }, namely:

Referring to Figure 1, it is worth mentioning that to provide a relatively small throughput decrease, consecutive symbols overlapping with each other by β samples can yield an effective OFDM symbol duration of N + N_CP + β samples.

The primary advantages of this method is its low computational complexity, independence of the modulated data, and its suitability for NC-OFDM. When employed by a CR communication system attempting to access the available spectrum in a dynamically varying radio environment, it is also important that the length and shape of the applied window can be also altered dynamically. This method is the most suitable for minimizing the interference in the PU transmission that is relatively distant in frequency from SU transmission band [7, 31]. The main drawback of this method is the decrease of throughput caused by the addition of the CS.

3.3 Cancellation carriers

The CCs method [32] takes advantage of the spectrum shape of each subcarrier in order to reduce the resulting OOB interference level. As each OFDM symbol possesses a limited time duration, this can be interpreted as cutting out a part of an infinitely long OFDM symbol by a rectangular window. In other words, the spectrum of each subcarrier is convolved with a sinc function, thus widening the spectral overlapping regions with the other subcarrier spectra. Although this is generally the primary reason for the existence of high OOB interference, this phenomenon can be manipulated in a positive fashion using the CCs method, where a subset of active subcarriers are selected for the sole purpose of cancelling the OOB interference of the adjacent subcarriers. As the subcarriers closest to the spectrum edge have the strongest influence on the OOB radiation, they are usually chosen to carry the cancelling signal, and they do not support any data transmissions themselves. The sidelobes of these subcarriers are intended to negatively combine with the sum of the sidelobes resulting from the active data-bearing subcarriers, thus potentially reducing the overall OOB interference levels as shown in Figure 2.

where Π_CC is the maximum allowable power for CCs. Although the solution of (3) is widely known, and has been presented in [33, 34], the constraint (4) increases the computational complexity of the optimization problem significantly, requiring us to solve the Lagrange inequality for each OFDM symbol, which might become infeasible for wideband transmissions possessing a large number of subcarriers.

Another drawback of the CC method, apart from the computational complexity, is the link-performance deterioration, i.e., an increase of the BER. This is due to the fact that an OFDM system usually operates under the total power constraint. If part of an OFDM symbol energy is sacrificed to the CCs, the remaining energy that can be used for data transmission is reduced, and this naturally results in an SNR loss and corresponding BER degradation.

Nevertheless, the CC algorithm has been extensively investigated, and a number of modifications and combinations of the CC algorithm with other methods has been presented in the literature, e.g., refer to proposed approaches in [35–37]. For example, active interference cancellation (AIC) [33] is a method similar to CCs solution, where in addition to the OFDM edge-subcarriers several other subcarriers inside the PU transmission band are also used to minimize the OOB radiation. However, as shown in the aforementioned paper, the AIC subcarriers inside the PU transmission band possess a negligible influence on the OOB interference. Moreover, they can significantly increase the computational complexity of the resulting implementation. The CCs method is very flexible in terms of defining the number of cancellation subcarriers and their power levels. Moreover, some of its shortcomings can be efficiently equalized if the W method with a parameter-defined window duration is also applied.

4.1 Reduced-complexity reduced-power combined CCs and windowing

The combination of CCs with windowing seems to be a promising spectrum shaping mechanism. While windowing method provides better OOB interference mitigation for spectrum components more distant from occupied OFDM band on the frequency axis, the CCs method has the same behavior for components closer to the OFDM nominal band as shown in [34]. Thus, the combination of both methods, which was also presented in [34], provides additional degrees of freedom as the number of CCs and window shapes can be altered to fulfill the transmission requirements. In this section, we present several additional enhancements to this combined approach, thus yielding a reduction in the computational complexity, reduction of the energy-loss (energy inefficiency) due to the use of the CCs, and an improvement of the BER performance.

The system that we consider in this research consists of a conventional OFDM modulator, where the CCs unit, which performs the CCs algorithm, is employed prior to the N-size IFFT block, and windowing is applied to the time domain signal after extending it with the CP. The resulting OFDM-modulated signal after the OOB interference reduction process is then fed to the digital-to-analog converter and the IF/RF (Intermediate Frequency/Radio Frequency) front-end.

For a set of frequency-sampling points l = {l₁,...,l _δ } defined in the optimization region, and for n ∈ c, the coefficients p_n,lare the elements of the matrix ${\mathbf{P}}_{\text{CC}}^{\left(\delta \times \gamma \right)}$, and can be pre-calculated. Similarly, for the data carriers, when n ∈ d, p_n,ldefines the matrix ${\mathbf{P}}_{\text{DC}}^{\left(\delta \times \alpha \right)}$, and can be calculated off-line.

where []⁺ denotes the pseudoinverse. Although such a solution is relatively fast with respect to computational complexity, since the multiplication of vector sd by a precalculated matrix is performed for each OFDM symbol, it suffers from several issues.

The reference system in this case is the one that employs the nulled guard sub carriers on the subcarriers used by the CCs method in the proposed system. Another significant drawback is a substantial increase of the PAPR that is caused by the high power values transmitted on the CCs correlated with the DCs. Apart from the PAPR value, usually the probability of peaks occurrence is also taken into account since it is conceivable that the time-domain peaks possessing moderate instantaneous power can cause nonlinear distortions and performance deterioration that can prove to be much worse than the high power (strong) peaks occurring relatively infrequently. On the basis of this observation, the PAPR is measured with a certain probability p PSPR. We will determine this metric later in this section when providing simulation results for a probability of p PAPR = 10^-3.

where S(f) is the power spectral density (PSD) function of the considered NC-OFDM secondary-user signal, B_SU-CC is the ba ndwidth of the considered NC-OFDM secondary-user transmission used by the data subcarriers (excluding cancellation subcarriers frequency bands), and f_CC is any one of the frequencies belonging to CCs bands. This definition for the SOR can be interpreted as the logarithm of the PSD peaks of CCs with respect to the mean power level in data carriers band. The occurrence of these peaks is measured with probability p_SOR. Note that in simulation results presented in the next subsection, p_SOR = 10^-1 will be considered. This probabilistic approach is required to take a varying characteristic of the PSD estimate into account.

where I^{(γ × γ)} is a γ-size identity matrix, and W results from multiplication of the first two matrices in the above equation. Such an optimization has similar computational complexity to the optimization problem of (7), as only once for a given spectrum mask, and after the number of DCs and CCs are determined, the optimization (calculation of matrix W) is implemented. Then, for each OFDM symbol, matrix-by-vector multiplication is carried out with pre-calculated matrix W elements. The performance and influence on various system parameters will be evaluated in the next section.

The optimization procedure described above significantly reduces the SNR loss typically found for a CCs method. This is obtained as a result of imposing a constraint on the value of the SOR, which consequently reduces the power assigned to CCs and increases power reserved for the DCs. Nevertheless, the reduced power available for data subcarriers still cause some deterioration of the reception quality. Therefore, we propose the following reception technique that makes use of the CCs inherent redundancy.

where ${\tilde{\mathbf{s}}}_{\mathbf{d}+\mathbf{c}}$ is a received vertical vector at the output of FFT block containing distorted and noisy values of data and cancellation subcarriers. Although the calculation of matrix R can be quite complex, it needs to be performed only once for each channel instance and subcarrier pattern. Moreover, with a systematic code implementation, this method may be treated as optional, reserved only for high performance, high quality reception.

Note that the reference system for this definition, i.e., all subcarriers employed for data transmission, is prohibited from operating in the considered scenario, where the PU transmission protection is required and the SU sidelobes have to be reduced.

4.1.1 Simulation results

Below, we present the Monte Carlo simulation results using MATLAB and showing that our introduced modifications of the combined CC and W method improves the overall performance of the NC-OFDM system in several ways. In our experiments, we assumed N = 256 subcarriers, where the subcarriers possessing the indices d = {- 100,..., -62} ∪ {-41,..., -11} ∪ {10,..., 40} ∪ {61,..., 101} are occupied by the QPSK data symbols, and there are three CCs placed on each side of data carriers blocks, i.e. c = {- 103, - 102, -101} ∪ {- 10, -9, -8}∪{7, 8, 9}∪{41, 42, 43}∪{58, 59, 60}∪{102, 103, 104}. The subcarriers pattern of four data subcarrier blocks is separated with narrowband PUs, e.g., program making and special events (PMSE) devices such as professional wireless microphones with bandwidth of 200 kHz. Note that an explanation of the wideband and narrowband PU signals and scenarios under consideration with respect to the coexistence of the PU and SU transmissions are given in the next section, with the real-world experimental results. The duration of the CP equals N_CP = 16 samples, but the β = 16 samples of the Hanning window extension (equal to CS) are also used on each side of an OFDM symbol. The number of CCs and shaping window duration was chosen in such a way that the mean OOB interference power level is achieved at least 40 dB below the mean in-band power level for reasonable value of μ, i.e., μ = 0.01. This OOB power attenuation is sufficient in order to respect several regulatory spectrum masks, e.g., IEEE802.11 g [39] or LTE user-equipment [40] Spectrum Emission Mask (SEM).

First, in Figure 3, we show the results of the OOB power reduction obtained for the following three methods under consideration: CC method, windowing, and combined CC and W scheme. The comparison has been performed for the schemes that present the same potential throughput loss metric, which for our evaluation system equals R_loss = 19.2%. Such a potential throughput loss is obtained either from the CC method with γ_e = 4 CCs per edge of the DCs band, from the W method with Hanning window extension of β = 65 samples, or from the combined CCs and W method with γ_e = 3 and β = 16, i.e. the scenario described above. The PSDs were obtained for the signal before HPA using Welch's method after transmitting 10,000 random OFDM symbols. The spectrum was estimated in 4N frequency sampling points using 3N-length Hanning windows. Note, that the windowing method achieves a high OOB power attenuation, but it requires several frequency guard bands for the OOB attenuation slope. Thus, it is potentially unsuitable for protecting narrowband PU signals from unintentional secondary OB interference. Conversely, the CC method alone results in a relatively steep OOB power reduction, but the resulting OOB attenuation is not very high. The combination of both methods provides decent performance in terms of high and steep OOB attenuation, thus confirming that such a combination of these methods possesses the potential for protecting both wideband and narrowband PU signals employing strict requirements with respect to the signal-to-interference-power ratio. According to our other experiments for QAM/PSK schemes and to their results not presented here, the normalized PSD plots are very similar.

In Figure 4, several of the system performance metrics described above, such as the SOR for p sor = 10^-1, PAPR increase for p_PAPR = 10^-3, SNR loss for BER = 10^-4, and OOB power attenuation, are presented in relation to the optimization constraint parameter μ ∈ 〈10^-6,10⁰〉. Thus, the optimization procedure is considered in the range of μ, defining scenarios from a weak constraint on the CCs power, close to no power-constraint, to a constraint on the strictly limited CCs power. For these performance metrics under consideration, measurements have been obtained after the transmission of 2 × 10⁵ OFDM symbols. The SNR loss has been calculated at the receiver, for an example 4-paths Rayleigh-fading channel defined in Case 3 test scenario for UMTS user equipment [41]. Averaging of the results has been done using 10,000 channel realizations.

It can be observed in Figure 4 that the OOB power attenuation decreases slowly with an increase of μ for small values of μ. Thus, when μ is low, there is no use in spending additional power on CCs since the spurious OOB emissions remain the same. On the other hand, low-power CCs (for high μ values) do not provide improvement in OOB power over results obtained for windowing method without the application of CCs. However, the other metrics improve when μ increases. For example, the fluctuation of SOR ranges from 13.7 to --3.9 dB. It is worth mentioning that the rest of the system performance metrics are calculated with respect to the reference system, which does not use windowing and CCs for OOB power reduction. Instead, the CCs are replaced with zeros. The significant improvement is observed in PAPR-increase value that approaches zero, when μ becomes high. Both new optimization goal defined by (11), and proposed reception algorithm have influence on the values of an SNR loss with standard detection and with our proposed detection making use of the CCs redundancy. The stronger the limit is on the CCs power (the higher μ) the DCs power is not wasted as much on the CCs. Thus, the SNR loss changes from 4.8 dB for μ = 10^-6 to nearly 0 dB for μ = 10⁰.

The results after employing our proposed detection method show that not only do the DC power levels reassigned to the CCs was recovered, but also an additional improvement was achieved thanks in part to the frequency diversity introduced by CCs treated as parity symbols of the block code. We observe that the coding gain for BER = 10^-4 (with respect to system without CCs) varies from 6.42 dB for μ = 4 × 10^-6 to 0.7 dB for μ = 1. For very low values of μ(μ < 4 × 10^-6), the SNR loss caused by the introduction of CCs becomes higher than can be compensated for even by using high power CCs, which yields a coding gain decrease. The results presented in Figure 4 show that our reception algorithm making use of the CCs redundancy yields decent performance even in the assumed case of large fragmentation of available (not occupied by the PUs) frequency bands.

5.1 Implementation setup

One application for the deployment of CR systems and DSA networks is the opportunistic spectral usage of unoccupied portions of the TV frequency bands by future mobile radio systems such as long term evolution (LTE) mobile radio communication [42]. A television whitespace (TVWS) is a region of wireless frequencies where several digital video broadcasting-terrestrial (DVB-T) channels are not used by a licensed transmission, and therefore can be temporarily borrowed by TVWS devices capable of operating in these bands as long as they respect the limits concerning the maximum allowable transmit power in this area, as well as the level of their OOB interference power.

Moreover, it is envisioned that wireless microphones will be operating in these TVWS regions and associated frequency bands, as well as other wireless devices used for PMSE [43]. Although several spectrum regulators anticipate reserving one TV channel for the exclusive access by PMSE equipment (e.g., U.K. Ofcom reserves channel 38), it is anticipated to be not sufficient for large events that commonly use over 100 wireless microphones. Hence, PMSE devices may be using other channels as well. In order to address this application scenario, we consider the PU signals in this scenario to consist of a DVB-T transmission using an 8 MHz channel and a PMSE transmission possessing a 200 kHz bandwith. Moreover, the LTE transmissions are considered to be SU signals in these frequency bands. In particular, our tested system implements the LTE-like transmission with N = 512 subcarriers, with the possibility of turning some of the subcarriers off, as well as using some of them as the CCs for OOB interference reduction. The subcarrier spacing is 15 kHz, and the useful spanned band is 7.68 MHz. The CP duration in samples N_CP = N/ 16 has been used, and the binary phase shift keying (BPSK) signalling has been applied at each subcarrier.

Note that for our SU system the PMSE band spans over 14 subcarriers, and therefore such a PMSE transmission is considered as narrowband PU signal. If we consider channelization of the available subcarriers in blocks of 16 subcarriers, one block of subcarriers has to be deactivated in order to protect such a narrowband PU signal when detected. Our second type of PU signal, the DVB-T system uses at minimum 8 MHz channel, and thus more than the assumed SU bandwidth of 7.68 MHz. Therefore, it is considered to be a wideband PU signal, and if such a PU signal is detected, its channel must remain unoccupied by the SU system.

Employing the assumption that the LTE system is considered to be an SU signal, we investigate the OOB interference suppression taken from this system SEM. In particular, our goal is to achieve a 59 dB OOB interference power attenuation below the PSD level of data carriers for the first use-case of the high-power transmitter and call it use-case 1. Note, that the minimum required suppression defined in the LTE Base Station (BS) SEM employs this value, i.e., 59 dB. In our second use-case, called use-case 2, 26 dB will be the required OOB power attenuation, which is the typical value for the LTE user equipment transmitter that has to be obeyed in adjacent channels. Note that in order to protect various types of PU signals present in the spectrum, their required signal-to-interference ratio must be considered together with the signal attenuation between the SU transmitter and the PU receiver. Moreover, the PU receive filters parameters and their sensitivity have to be taken into account.

It is envisioned that the TVWS geolocation databases will provide the information on the maximum in-band and OOB power allowable at the specific location for the specific devices and services. Here, we assume that the PU signals and SU signals are located at a distance that allows the use of the standard SEMs for the reduction of the OOB interference. Nevertheless, our proposed shaping mechanism is designed so that it can fit flexibly to any existing SEM requirement and the OOB power suppression requirements can be changed dynamically when a new PU is detected in the adjacent channel or in the middle of transmission band of the SU.

In order to evaluate the flexibility of our spectrum shaping algorithms, we consider the following four scenarios of the PU and SU coexistence, namely:

5.2 Experiment outcomes

The spectrally agile OFDM experimental testbed developed at Poznan University of Technology utilizes the IRIS SDR platform [44]. IRIS was developed at Trinity College Dublin, and is a GPP-based rapid prototyping and deployment system. The building blocks of the radio components in a transceiver chain are written in C++. Extensible Markup Language (XML) is used to specify the signal chain construction and characteristics. The usability of this platform for demonstration of the OFDM signal spectrum shaping based on filtering has been described in [45]. Using this testbed, the IRIS SDR platform has been used in conjunction with the RF hardware front-end USRP N210 and its daughterboard XCVR2450. The transmitted signal spectrum at the output of the USRP front-end has been measured using a Rhode & Schwarz spectrum analyzer. Additionally, the transmit signal PSD at the output of the IRIS SW platform (at the input of the USRP) has been analyzed in MATLAB. The implementation setup of this testbed is shown in Figure 5.

In order to allow for the online reconfiguration, computationally efficient fast algorithm for optimization described in Section 4 has been applied, whose solution is given by formula (12). The most computationally complex operation, the matrix pseudoinverse, has been performed using CLAPACK [46] library. Other operations, i.e., matrix-matrix or matrix-vector multiplication, have been performed using self-built functions. However, their performance can be improved using low level specialized libraries such as BLAS. Our SU transmitter has been constructed to be fully reconfigurable, i.e., the indices of used data carriers, the numbers of CCs at each subcarriers block edge γ_e, or the window duration can be changed through the XML file.

In Figures 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, we present the results of our OOB power reduction scheme based on the modified CCs method combined with Windowing and applying new algorithms combating the spectrum overshooting problem and reducing computational complexity. Note that all these modifications and improvements necessary for practical implementation on a CR platform have been described in Section 4. Figures 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 show the PSDs of the OFDM (or NC-OFDM) SU transmissions under evaluation in our CR system with the wideband (DVB-T) and narrowband (PMSE) PU signals being protected from the interference of the high-power (BS) and low-power (user-equipment) SU transmitters. These figures show the results obtained from the scenarios under consideration (assuming the existence of PU signals) and use-cases (SEMs assumed), described in the previous subsection. The red curves present the PSD of the NC-OFDM signals with deactivated subcarriers, i.e., without any spectrum shaping method. In each plot, one can see that the sidelobe levels of the SU transmit signal without OOB power reduction possess relatively high power levels, i.e., only 20 dB below the power level in useful transmission band. The blue lines show the PSD of the SU signal generated at the output of the SW platform (the input to the USRP front-end) with our OOB reduction algorithm based on modified CC method with reduced complexity and windowing. There, one can see from all our evaluation scenarios that the required OOB power levels (either 59 dB or 26 dB below the power level in the nominal band) is achieved using adjustable parameters (the values of which are presented in Table 2). The same signal PSD at the output of the USRP front-end taken from the spectrum analyzer is plotted in black. The green line relates to the noise PSD observed in the spectrum analyzer. Note, that the USRP front-end introduces several nonlinearities that restrict the effectiveness of the OOB reduction to approximately -45 dB. This is the result of intermodulation products in the amplifiers and mixers of the USRP.^a This has an impact on our use-case 1, when high OOB attenuation is required. For use-case 2, when an OOB power attenuation lower than 45 dB is required, the influence of the intermodulation products is not crucial. Neither calibration (decrease) of the transmit power nor the PAPR reduction has resulted in any positive effect to reduce these nonlinear distortions in this experimental testbed. This is due to the fact that the amplifier does not operate in its saturation region with respect to its input-output characteristic, but it is still highly nonlinear. However, the quality of the USRP platform is not at the same caliber as an actual commercial base station, where higher-quality equipment is installed, and where there are high requirements for the OOB power attenuation.

5.3 Complexity versus interference suppression performance

The complexity of the proposed combination of CCs and a windowing algorithm is evaluated in this subsection. At the transmitter side, the complexity is significantly reduced in comparison with the standard implementation of the CC method. It is achieved via pre-computation of the W^{(γ × α}) matrix, which has the indirect constraint on the computational complexity embedded. Thus, the optimization procedure (which is particulary complex) does not have to be performed on-line for every OFDM-symbol. Instead it is implemented by multiplication of the data vector by the pre-computed matrix, as described in Section 4. The most complex operation is the computation of the pseudoinverse of a δ +γ × γ complex matrix. To achieve required accuracy of this task it is done by means of singular value decomposition whose complexity is 26γ³ + 8δγ² + 4δ²γ [47]. As γ is a number of CCs, which is usually much lower than the number of sampling points 8 in the optimization region and lower than the number of DCs α, this operation is feasible for the implementation even for portable devices.

The most important in our implementation was to reduce the number of computations needed for each OFDM symbol. This aim was achieved as calculation of CCs requires only αγ complex multiplications and (α -- 1)γ additions. The second part of shaping is achieved by windowing that requires extending each OFDM symbol. On each side of this symbol β samples are multiplied by windowing slopes, and thus 2β complex-by-real multiplications are required. As subsequent OFDM symbols overlap by β samples, β pairs of complex numbers have to be added.

The proposed receiver discussed in Section 4 introduces some additional complexity over the standard OFDM reception. This proposed reception algorithm results in noticeable performance improvement compensating for the power-loss (power wastage) related to the use of CCs. Nevertheless it is optional, and plausible to be used by more powerful devices where the highest quality is required even at the cost of reasonably increased computational complexity. In such a case, the matrix-by-vector multiplication using α(α + γ - 1) additions and (α + γ)α multiplications is required for each OFDM symbol. The calculation of the reception (decoding) matrix is more complex as it requires computation of the pseudoinverse of the dimension (α + γ) × α complex matrix. Based on [47], one can evaluate the complexity of such an operation as 4(α + γ)²α + 22α³ complex operations. In case of a slowly varying channel, the update of this matrix can be performed in long periodic time intervals. Efficient algorithms for updating the pseudoinverse on the basis of a previously computed pseudoinverse also exist, and can be used for the improved reception of the NC-OFDM signal with CCs.

The receiver complexity in our system depends strongly on the applied configuration. Our proposed decoding method decreases the BER significantly, but is approximately 300 times more computationally complex than standard detection. In addition, matrix-based reception depends strongly on number of DCs, so the worst result is observed in scenario 3. Nevetheless our proposed decoding is optional, as explained previously, and thus, it can be used only by more powerful devices.