Open Access

Compression with considerable sidelobe suppression effect in weather radar

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking20132013:97

https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2013-97

Received: 11 December 2012

Accepted: 26 February 2013

Published: 4 April 2013

Abstract

Pulse compression is a classical topic. Because of its function in resolution enhancement, pulse compression technology has been applied in many kinds of radar such as pulse Doppler weather radar. In pulse compression, sidelobe suppression plays a key role for reducing clutter. In this article, a combination of two sidelobe suppression techniques for pulse compression is proposed. Simulation results show that the combination of the two techniques has better sidelobe suppression effectiveness.

Keywords

Pulse compression Sidelobe suppression Weather radar

1. Introduction

Radar, serving as a kind of method for detecting, has wide-range application areas such as military, aviation, geosciences, and so on. Pulse Doppler weather radar is an important device to detect clouds, wind fields, and precipitation. So, the resolution is very important for the forecasting of weather phenomena.

Pulse compression is useful for weather radar to increase the average transmitted power by transmitting a longer pulse but without reducing the range resolution of the radar. In general, peak power of solid-state transmitter or millimeter-wave klystron is not sufficient. Pulse compression is required to achieve the desired system sensitivity. Different coding schemes include linear frequency modulation (LFM), nonlinear FM. Frequency-modulated signals are characterized by their time bandwidth (TB) product which represents the ability to multiple signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

The foundation of pulse compression is matched filtering [1]. In time domain, matched filtering is equivalent to the autocorrelation of the input signal. In frequency domain, the transfer function of the matched filter is the complex conjugate of the input signal’s spectrum. An implementation schedule of the matched filter in frequency domain is shown in Figure 1[1].
Figure 1

Implementation of matched filter by conjugate filters pair.

For a radar pulse signal, after compression, the narrower pulse mainlobe is always accompanied by higher sidelobes. So, all pulse compression radars suffer from range side lobes which cause energy from strong reflections to leak into adjacent range cells. High suppression of side lobes is not required in some other non-meteorological radar, but is important for meteorological radar, because weather phenomena can have significant reflectivity gradients, and ground clutter echo can be between 35 and 55 dB much larger than medium rain. Furthermore, the side lobes of strong signal will falsely be recognized as an existence of small target. Therefore, range side lobes must be suppressed by a large amount to prevent contamination in adjacent range cells.

In this article, compression experiments are conducted on an LFM sample signal extracted from a period of echo of a weather radar. In these experiments, some sidelobe suppression algorithms are used. The algorithms include multiplying window in frequency domain, phase distortion, and frequency modification.

In Section 2, the data are analyzed and compression basing on matched filtering and windowed matched filtering are carried out. In Section 3, spectrum modification technique and phase predistortion technique are utilized, respectively, and the effects are analyzed. Then, the two techniques are combined in Section 4. Experiments are conducted on the real weather echo and the effects are compared. Section 5 is the conclusion.

2. LFM pulse and matched filtering compression

A period of weather echo of a pulse Doppler radar is shown in Figure 2. The sample rate of the echo is 4.8 MHz. The pulse width is 33.3 μs and the spectrum width after LFM is 2 MHz.
Figure 2

A period of weather echo of a pulse Doppler radar.

A section which is a whole LFM pulse signal is intercepted from the echo above. This LFM pulse, shown in Figure 3, can be taken as the sample signal to do pulse compression. Its amplitude spectrum is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 3

The LFM pulse intercept from the echo.

Figure 4

The spectrum of the LFM pulse.

To analyze the frequency modulation quality of the pulse in Figure 3, we extract the phase information and unwrap it. The phases before and after unwrapping are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively.
Figure 5

The phase before unwrapping.

Figure 6

The phase after unwrapping.

Quadratic curve fitting is done on the phase, the fitting result is illustrated in Figure 7.
Figure 7

Fitting of the phase.

We found that the phase and the fitting curve superpose each other. This indicates that the linearity of the frequency is good and the pulse is a suitable LFM sample.

Matched filtering [1] is carried out on the LFM pulse directly and the compression result is shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8

Compression result by matched filtering.

The amplitude of the first sidelobe is –17.4827 dB and the compression ratio is about 83.3.

A sidelobe of –17.4827 dB is not satisfying for most target detecting, because there will be serious range ambition if the sidelobe is too high.

During matching filtering, multiplying a window in the frequency domain can suppress the sidelobe to a certain level. But in general, the lower sidelobe is often accompanied by a wider mainlobe after windowed matched filtering.

The general formation of a weighting window can be expressed as follows [2]:
H f = K + 1 K cos n πf B
(1)

When K = 0.08 and n = 2, the weighting function is a Hamming window; when K = 0.333 and n = 2, the function is a 3:1 taper weighting, when K = 0 and n = 2, 3, 4, respectively, the functions are cosine square, cosine cube, and cosine quartic weighting.

Weighting the LFM pulse in frequency domain with a Hamming window, the window and the compressed pulse after matched filtering are shown in Figures 9 and 10.
Figure 9

The Hamming window.

Figure 10

Compression result by Hamming windowed matched filtering.

It can be seen from Figure 10 that the sidelobe is suppressed to the level of –37 dB. From theoretical analysis we can educe that the mainlobe broaden to 1.47 times of the one before windowing.

For Doppler weather radar, to enhance the accuracy of weather target detecting, a lower sidelobe is needed. So, further improvements of pulse compression effects are demanded.

3. Sidelobe suppression by phase predistortion and spectrum modification

For an LFM signal with TB product, the cubic phase predistortion technique can be used to suppress the sidelobe [3, 4]. The signal with little TB product has large ripples in its spectrum band, so widowing is not satisfying for sidelobe suppression. In this situation, the sidelobe suppression can be achieved by suppressing the ripples in band through phase predistortion. This method is easy to implement with surface acoustic wave (SAW) technique.

Suppose the complex expression of the LMF signal to carry out phase predistortion on is
s t = exp j 2 π f 0 t + B 2 T · t 2 + φ t , T / 2 ΔT t T / 2 + ΔT
(2)
where f0 is the central frequency and B is the bandwidth. And the duration of the pulse is T. Then the additional phase item can be
φ t = ΔB 3 Δ T 2 · t T / 2 3 , T / 2 ΔT t < T / 2 ΔB 3 Δ T 2 · t T / 2 3 , T / 2 < t T / 2 + ΔT 0 , elsewhere
(3)

where ΔT = 1/B and ΔB = 0.75B[3].

The spectrum of the pulse after phase predistortion is shown in Figure 11 and after multiplying a Hamming window, the predistorted spectrum is illustrated as shown in Figure 12.
Figure 11

Spectrum after phase predistortion.

Figure 12

Windowed spectrum after phase predistortion.

After matched filtering, the effect of pulse compression is shown in Figure 13.
Figure 13

Compression result by windowed matched filtering after phase predistortion.

Figure 13 demonstrated that the sidelobes neighboring to the mainlobe are suppressed well (3–4 dB) through matched filtering after phase-predistortion. But in the positions away from the mainlobe, there are some sidelobe hunches and this may bring range ambiguity of two targets far away from each other.

In ideal situation, the output of the matched filter for an LFM signal has rectangular spectrum. After weighting, the rectangular spectrum becomes a certain window. But when the TB product of the LFM signal is small, its ripples in band are large, so the weighting has little effects for ripple suppression in band. In this case, spectrum modification technique can be resorted to make the processed spectrum approaches ideal window function mostly [5, 6] and to enhance the main-to-side lobe ratio.

Spectrum modification can be implemented by modifying the transfer function of the matched filter. Suppose the spectrum of the LFM signal is U(f) and the transfer function is H(f), to make the output of the matched filtering to be a rectangular, it is needed that:
U f H f = I f I * f , I f = rect f / B
(4)
The modified transfer function of the matched filter is
H f = U * f I f I * f / U f 2
(5)
The pulse compression result after using spectrum modification is shown in Figure 14.
Figure 14

Compression result by windowed matched filtering after spectrum modification.

From Figure 14, it can be seen that spectrum modification technique has good suppression effect for the sidelobes neighboring the mainlobe. What is the most important, this technique bring a great advantage that suppress the sidelobes far away from the mainlobe to the level under –62 dB.

It is stressed that both phase predistortion and spectrum modification did not spread the mainlobe apparently.

4. Combination of phase predistortion and spectrum modification

From the simulation results in Section 3, we can find that both phase predistortion and spectrum modification have the ability of sidelobe suppression. But phase predistortion can bring hunches far away from the mainlobe and spectrum modification has good effect of suppression to the sidelobes in the distance. So, we predict that the combination of these two techniques will bring better pulse compression performance. The two techniques are used sequentially as shown in Figure 15.
Figure 15

The flow chart of the combined pulse compression technique.

Figure 16 is the result of the simulation utilizing two techniques sequentially.
Figure 16

Compression result with sidelobe suppression by combination of phase predistortion and spectrum modification.

From Figure 16, it can be seen that

  • The first sidelobe is suppressed to the level under –45 dB, and the sidelobes attenuate quickly when getting far away from the mainlobe.

  • The envelope of the sidelobes is monotonically decreasing.

  • The mainlobe does not spread apparently comparing with the result only using weighting function.

In order to compare the effectiveness for pulse compression and sidelobe suppression of the several methods collectively, the data are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Effectiveness of pulse compression and sidelobe suppression

Methods

Mainlobe compression ratio

Sidelobe suppression (dB)

Sidelobe attenuation speed

No sidelobe suppression

1/833

−17.5

Fast

Hamming window only

1/567

−37.0

Slow

The whole sky weather echoes before and after pulse compression are shown in Figure 17.
Figure 17

The whole sky weather radar echoes. (a) Echo with no pulse compression, (b) Echo after compression with phase predistortion, (c) Echo after compression with spectrum modification, (d) Echo after compression with phase predistortion and spectrum modification.

It can be seen from Figure 17 that
Figure 18

SNR statistical comparison between phase predistortion method and combined method of phase predistortion and spectrum modification.

  • The resolution of weather radar echo is very poor without pulse compression.

  • Phase predistortion and spectrum modification can bring comparative resolution enhancement through sidelobe suppression. But spectrum modification technique brings some false target echo in the upper left corner of the reflectivity section.

  • The combination of phase predistortion and spectrum modification has the best resolution.

  • Furthermore, it is evaluated to statistics the weather echoes SNR of three methods. The mean SNR value of compression with phase predistortion is 0.044 dB less than compression with phase predistortion and spectrum modification, the variance value is 0.4528 dB. The mean SNR value of compression with spectrum modification is 0.017 dB less than compression with phase predistortion and spectrum modification, the variance value is 0.2664 dB.

  • Figure 18 shows the SNR statistical comparison between phase predistortion method and combined method of phase predistortion and spectrum modification.

  • Figure 19 shows the SNR statistical comparison between spectrum modification and combined method of phase predistortion and spectrum modification.

Figure 19

SNR statistical comparison between spectrum modification and combined method of phase predistortion and spectrum modification.

5. Conclusion

Sidelobe suppression is an important part in pulse compression. From the simulations and application on weather radar, it can be seen that the combination of phase predistortion and spectrum modification technique has good sidelobe suppression performance. In some applications involving hardware implementation and real-time processing, the SAW device can be used to carry out impulse compression [7, 8]. Resolution enhancing is important for both weather radar and other kinds of radar, such as the imaging radar [9, 10], so it is still a hotspot for research. The methods development by this article can be used in other kinds of radar with pulse compression systems.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Electronic Engineering, Chengdu University of Information Technology
(2)
CMA, Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Sounding

References

  1. Lin M, Ke Y: Theory of Radar Signal. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press; 1984:87-203.Google Scholar
  2. Cook CE, Bernfeld M, Paolillo J, Palmier CA: Matched filtering, pulse compression and waveform design. Microwave. J. 1965, 8: 73-81.Google Scholar
  3. Cook CE, Paolillo J: A pulse compression predistortion function for efficient sidelobe reduction in a high-power radar. Proc. IEEE 1964, 52: 377-389.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kowatsch M: Suppression of sidelobes in rectangular linear FM pulse compression radar. Proc. IEEE 1982, 70(3):308-309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lv Y, Xiang J, Chen F: A method for reducing range-sidelobes of linear frequency-modulated pulse compression signals. J. UEST China 1993, 22(4):344-349.Google Scholar
  6. Yang B, Wu J: A range sidelobe reduction technique based on modifications to signal spectrum. Syst. Eng. Electron. 2000, 22(9):90-93.Google Scholar
  7. Xianmin Z, Jinlin X, Hongtai W, Qing X: SAW pulse compression systems with lower sidelobes. In Microwave Conference Proceedings, APMC'97, vol. 2. Hongkong; 1997:833-835.Google Scholar
  8. Arthur JW: Modern SAW-based pulse compression systems for radar applications. I. SAW matched filters. Electron. Commun. Eng. 1995, 7(6):236-246. 10.1049/ecej:19950604View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Li J, Pi Y, Yang X: Micro-doppler signature feature analysis in Terahertz band. J. Infrared Millim. TE 2010, 31(3):319-328.Google Scholar
  10. Xu J, Pi Y, Cao Z: Bayesian compressive sensing in synthetic aperture radar imaging. IET Radar Sonar Navigat. 2012, 6(1):2-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.