- Research
- Open access
- Published:

# The sensitivity of modulation fidelity on PA envelope variation in OFDM transmitter systems

*EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking*
**volumeÂ 2014**, ArticleÂ number:Â 52 (2014)

## Abstract

Intermodulation distortion (IMD) caused by nonlinear power amplifier (PA) is a major weakness in orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) transmitter systems, and most behavioral studies of IMD are based on specific example PAs. In recent papers, PA percentage linearization (PL), a general measurement for PA envelope variation, is investigated for its influence on system performance. Meanwhile, PL still somehow depends on specific example PA, and it mostly considers the PA saturation point (SP) variation. In this paper, a comparison analysis is presented to investigate the system performance when both SP and nonlinearity onset point (NOP) variations are considered. The simulations show that how the PA envelope variation can be represented by the signal impairment over IBO and OBO domains, respectively. It is interesting to find that although SP attracts much concern in current studies, NOP actually has a clear influence on modulation fidelity of nonlinear OFDM transmitter systems. Moreover, it is observed that when input power gets close to saturation range, the PAs having relatively higher nonlinearity show relatively lower distortion level over the input power domain. These interesting simulation observations above are analytically explained based on a mixed time domain and statistical analysis of IMD mechanism. An example IEEE 802.11a OFDM signal is driving through five example solid state PAs, and the system performance is measured by error vector magnitude (EVM) and adjacent channel power ratio (ACPR).

## 1 Introduction

Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM)-modulated signals are widely used in wireless communications systems for their advantage of high spectrum efficiency [1, 2]. However, OFDM signals have a nature of high peak to average power ration (PAPR), since they consist of lots of independent input subcarriers. This high PAPR nature makes OFDM transmitter systems very sensitive to the nonlinearity of RF power amplifiers (PAs) integrated within transmitters, and significant nonlinear distortion generated in the amplification process is a major weakness of OFDM signal systems [3, 4]. The nonlinear distortion can be evaluated by the modulation fidelity over wanted subcarriers and the out-of-band spectral regrowth, and they can be quantitatively expressed by error vector magnitude (EVM) and adjacent channel power ration (ACPR), respectively [5].

For the designers of OFDM transmitter systems, the influence of PA envelope character on system modulation fidelity is a fundamental concern, and it attracts lots of studies [6â€“9]. However, most relevant studies are based on a specific example PA, and the influence of PA envelope variation on system performance is not well explored yet. In recent papers [10, 11], the PA envelopes are characterized by percentage linearization (PL) determined by PA saturation point (SP), and the influence of PL on system modulation fidelity is investigated. Meanwhile, the influence of PA envelope is not investigated yet as both SP and nonlinear onset point (NOP) variations are considered. Thus, a couple of questions can be asked here. What is the influence of PA envelope on modulation fidelity performance of nonlinear OFDM transmitter systems when both NOP and SP variations are considered? Can the simulation observations be explained analytically? This paper presents our efforts to answer these questions.

In this paper, the characteristic of PAs is considered as some kind of degradations from that of the ideal PA, i.e., a fully linearized hard limiter. This degradation is characterized by both NOP and SP defined in [10, 11]. Totally, five solid-state PA (SSPAs) envelopes with various settings of NOP and SP are designed, where the AM/PM conversion of these PA envelopes are neglected as in [10, 12], and these example PAs are modeled by Bessel-Fourier (BF) behavioral model [13, 14]. A 16QAM-modulated IEEE 802.11a OFDM signal is driven through these designed PAs. The intermodulation distortion (IMD) of output signal of example PAs is measured by EVM and ACPR, and the obtained EVM and ACPR results are displayed over input backoff (IBO) and output backoff (OBO) domains, respectively. This allows us to see how the variations of PA envelopes are represented through their associated EVM/ACPR results. An interesting outcome is that when these example PAs are driven close to their saturation ranges, PAs having relatively higher nonlinearity show relatively lower distortion level over IBO domain. On the contrary, PAs having relatively higher nonlinearity show relatively higher distortion level over the whole OBO domain. Another interesting outcome observed from the comparative experiment is that NOP is not much concerned in the characterization of PA envelope in current studies, but the system performance actually is more sensitive to the variation of NOP than to that of SP. These simulation observations are analytically discussed by using a recent mixed time-domain and statistical analysis approach of IMD [15, 16]. It can be seen that when input power increases, the weights of high-order terms in PA Bessel-Fourier model become comparable with those of dominated low-order terms. Therefore, the IMD of a PA envelope becomes more sensitive to the input power as it has more high-order model terms. This finding explains the simulation observations.

Section 2 presents the designed example PA envelopes. Section 3 presents the BF PA envelope model and the mixed time-domain and statistical analysis approach of IMD. The simulation observations and associated discussions are presented in Section 4, and this is followed by the conclusion in Section 5.

## 2 PA envelopes having various NOPs and SPs

In simulation-based analysis of nonlinear OFDM transmitter systems, the single SSPA transfer characteristic used can vary from device to device. Without comparative analysis of multiple-PA-based simulation experiment, valuable outcomes can be missed. In this paper, several PA envelopes having various envelope characters are designed, and the design scheme is presented below.

As in [13], generally, the input-output map of an amplification transfer system can be represented by the following nonlinear differential equation:

where *s*_{o}(*t*) and *s*_{i}(*t*) are the output and input signals, respectively. In PA transmitters, the fading memory effects of transfer character is related to the input signal only. As in [9, 10, 13, 17, 18], memoryless nonlinearity dominates PA transfer character, and it can be characterized by memoryless PA envelope character, i.e.,

where *g*[.] and *Î¦*[.] denote PA AM/AM and AM/PM conversion, respectively; and *A*_{e}(*t*) is the envelope amplitude of input signal. Since AM/PM conversion of SSPAs does not have strong variation [13], *Î¦*[.] of example PAs is set as zero.

As in [10, 11], PL is developed for the characterization of PA envelope, which depends on the SP variation. In this paper, five PA envelopes are presented with independent SP and NOP variation applied. The concepts of NOP, SP, and the characteristicâ€™s ideal saturation point (CISP) are shown in FigureÂ 1. The five example PA envelopes, i.e., *L*_{0} to *L*_{4}, are designed to have various NOP and SP degradation referring to *L*_{0}, i.e., their NOPs and SPs depart from CISP. A smooth envelope characteristic is designed to connect NOP and SP when they depart from CISP, and the derivative function of designed PA envelope smoothly decreases from 1 to 0 when the input power sweeps from NOP to SP. In this paper, the distance of NOP and SP to CISP, written as *D*_{NOP-CISP} and *D*_{SP-CISP}, is measured along the asymptotic ideal linearity character (AILC) line and asymptotic output saturation power (AOSP) line, respectively. TableÂ 1 shows the *D*_{NOP-CISP} and *D*_{SP-CISP} of all five example PAs, and the percentage linearization area (PL_{A}), defined in [10, 11], of all designed PAs, is presented in TableÂ 1 as well. The five example PA envelopes are presented in FigureÂ 2, and their input and output are normalized to those of CISP.

## 3 IMD analysis in nonlinear OFDM transmitter systems

The input OFDM signal including *N* subcarriers, denoted as *s*_{i}(*t*) here, can be written as

where *A*_{
l
}(*t*)*Ï†*_{
l
}(*t*) and *f*_{
l
} denote the amplitude, phase, and frequency of the *l* th subcarrier. In this paper, Bessel-Fourier behavioral model is selected for the example PA envelopes for its unique advantage when dealing with OFDM-like multi-carrier signals [13â€“15]. Using Bessel-Fourier model, the zonal band PA output signal, *s*_{o}(*t*), can be written as

where *D*_{mod} is the model dynamic range [18]; {J}_{{n}_{l}} is the {n}_{l}^{\text{th}} order Bessel function of the first kind; *b*_{
k
} is the *k* th coefficient of an *L* th order Bessel-Fourier model. As in [13, 14], *s*_{o}(*t*) includes fundamental carriers and zonal band intermodulation products (IMPs), and each of them maps to a unique realization of the parameter set [ *n*_{1}, *n*_{2},â€¦, *n*_{
N
}]. The fundamental carriers IMPs can be distinguished by the condition of\mathrm{\xe2\u02c6\u2018}\left|{n}_{l}\right|=\mathrm{\xce\xbb}, where *Î»*=1 indicates fundamental carriers and other values of *Î»*(*Î»*â‰¥3) indicates the *Î»* th order IMPs.

Equation 4 requires an unacceptable computation cost in IMD simulation, and it can be simplified. As derived in [15, 16], the power level of individual fundamental carrier or IMP mapping to [ *n*_{1},â€¦, *n*_{
N
}], denoted as {P}_{[{n}_{1},\xe2\u20ac\xa6{n}_{N}]}, can be written as

where *Ïƒ*^{2} denotes the power of input OFDM signal. Thus, as in [15], the power spectra of fundamental carriers and IMD, denoted as PS_{fund}(*f*,*Ïƒ*^{2}) and PS_{IMD}(*f*,*Ïƒ*^{2}), can be written as

and

where *f* denotes the frequency; *Î´*[.] is the Dirac function; DDF_{3}(*f*) denotes the distribution density function of third-order IMPs as defined in [15], and it can be easily counted according to the number of subcarriers. Here, IMD is represented by the dominated third-order IMPs, and higher-order IMPs are omitted.

The relation between *D*_{mod} and *Ïƒ*^{2} is discussed in [18]. As derived in [16], we can have that

Applying (8), (6) and (7) can be re-written as

and

Thus, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of nonlinearly amplified OFDM signal, *R*_{non}(*Ïƒ*^{2}), can be written as

where ch denotes the signal band of OFDM fundamental carriers. Based on the range estimation of Bessel series kernel in (7), i.e., \mathrm{\xcf\u20ac}\sqrt{{\mathrm{\xcf\u0192}}^{2}}/\left({D}_{\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{mod}}\sqrt{N}\right), it can be derived that

This indicates that the power of IMD increased as input power as *Ïƒ*^{2} increases, and the power of high-order IMD components are more sensitive to the variation of *Ïƒ*^{2} than that of the low-order ones.

## 4 Simulation observations and discussions

In this section, the modulation fidelity of an IEEE 802.11a OFDM signal driving through five example SSPAs are presented. The EVM and ACPR are two specific measures of system SNR, which focuses on the in-band distortion and out-band spectrum regrowth, respectively. The EVM and ACPR results shown in this section are simulated based on the classical statistical (Stat) approach in [14]. The simulation results reveal how the PA nonlinearity is represented by the signal impairment over IBO and OBO domains, respectively, and the associated simulation observations are discussed based on above analysis.

In FigureÂ 3, the simulated EVM and ACPR results of five example PAs are presented. It can be seen that when the input power is around linear or quasi-linear ranges (e.g., around 5 dB), the order of nonlinear impairment of all five example PAs (from high to low) is *L*_{0}, *L*_{1}, *L*_{2}, *L*_{3}, and *L*_{4}. However, when the input power is close to saturation range (e.g., around -4 dB), the former order changes to *L*_{4}, *L*_{3}, *L*_{2}, *L*_{1}, and *L*_{0}. Referring to TableÂ 1, here we can notice that NOP has a very clear influence on system modulation fidelity and that the PAs have better linearity generate higher IMD as they are driven close to saturation ranges.

In FigureÂ 4, the constellation diagrams of amplified OFDM signals driven through *L*_{0} and *L*_{4} are presented, which are driven at operating points of IBO 5 dB and -3 dB, respectively. It can be seen that, from the constellation diagrams, *L*_{4} generates higher IMD than *L*_{0} does within low input power range, while *L*_{0} generates higher IMD than *L*_{4} does within high input power range. This observation is consistent with that of FigureÂ 3.

In FigureÂ 5, the power spectrum graphs of all example PAs at IBO 6 and -2 dB are presented. It can be seen that *L*_{0} generates the lowest spectra regrowth than others do within low-input power range, while it generates the highest spectra regrowth within high-input power range. This observation is consistent with FiguresÂ 3 and 4, and it can be explained as follows. Since NOP has the clear influence on the convergence of coefficient spectrum of Bessel-Fourier PA model, and as shown in FigureÂ 6 below, the weight of high-order model terms clearly increases as *D*_{NOP-CISP} decreases. For example, the Bessel-Fourier PA model of *L*_{0} has more high-order terms than that of *L*_{4} does, since *L*_{0} has a smaller *D*_{NOP-CISP} than *L*_{4} does. Furthermore, As analyzed around (12), the power of high-order IMD components is more sensitive to the variation of *Ïƒ*^{2} than that of the low-order ones. That is, as *Ïƒ*^{2} increases, the high-order model components show clear weights in total IMD. Therefore, IMD generated by *L*_{0} is higher than that generated by *L*_{4} as operating point is close to saturation points.

In FigureÂ 6, the weights of Bessel-Fourier model terms of *L*_{0} and *L*_{4} example PAs are presented. It can be seen that as analyzed above, the weights of high-order terms of *L*_{0} PA are higher than those of *L*_{4}. This is because *L*_{0} has a relatively sharp variation at CISP. Thus, as observed in above figures, the modulation fidelity of *L*_{0} shows more significant degradation than *L*_{4} does when input power increased.

In FigureÂ 7, the EVM and ACPR results are displayed over OBO domain. It can be seen here that the PAs having relatively higher linearity, such as *L*_{0}, show better modulation fidelity over the whole OBO range. This is because that OBO is not sensitive to IBO when PAs are driven close to saturation range.

## 5 Conclusions

In this paper, a comparison analysis is presented to investigate the system performance when both SP and nonlinearity onset point (NOP) variations are considered. The simulations show that how the PA envelope variation can be represented by the signal impairment over IBO and OBO domains, respectively. It is interesting to find that although SP attracts much concern in current studies, NOP actually has the clear influence on modulation fidelity of nonlinear OFDM transmitter systems. Moreover, it is observed when input power gets close to saturation range, the PAs having relatively higher nonlinearity show relatively lower distortion level over the input power domain. These interesting simulation observations above are analytically explained based on a mixed time domain and statistical analysis of the IMD mechanism.

## Authorsâ€™ information

YL, MD, and YJ are from State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems and Networks, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.

## References

Oâ€™Droma M, Ganchev I: The creation of a ubiquitous consumer wireless world through strategic ITU-T standardization.

*IEEE Commun. Mag*2010, 10: 158-165. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2010.5594691Yoo H, Guilloud F, Pyndiah R: Amplitude PDF analysis of OFDM signal using probabilistic PAPR reduction method.

*EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw*2011. doi:10.1155/2011/983915Lei Y, Oâ€™Droma M, Bertran E, Gilabert P: On modeling of nonlinear distortion in OFDM transmitter systems. In

*Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference*. Hong Kong, China; December 2008:16-20. doi:10.1109/APMC.2008.4958103Helaly T, Dansereau R, El-Tanany M: An efficient measure for nonlinear distortion severity due to HPA in downlink DS-CDMA signals.

*EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw*2010. doi:10.1155/2010/945427IEEE,Local and metropolitan area networks Specific requirementsPart 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications. ANSI/IEEE Std 802.11a, (1999)

Zhidkov SV: Performance analysis of multi-carrier systems in the presence of smooth nonlinearity.

*EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw*2004. doi:10.1155/S1687147204406124Dâ€™Andrea AN, Lottici AN, Reggiannini R: Nonlinear predistortion of OFDM signals over frequency-selective fading channels.

*IEEE Trans. Commun*2001, 5: 837-843. doi:10.1109/26.923807Singla R, Sharma S: Digital predistortion of power amplifiers using look-up table method with memory effects for LTE wireless systems.

*EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw*2012. doi:10.1186/1687-1499-2012-330Costa E, Pupolin S: M-QAM-OFDM system performance in the presence of a nonlinear amplifier and phase noise.

*IEEE Trans. Commun*2002, 3: 462-472. doi:10.1109/26.990908Oâ€™Droma M, Mgebrishvili N, Goacher A: New percentage linearization measures of the degree of linearization of HPA nonlinearity.

*IEEE Commun. Lett*2004, 4: 214-216. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2004.823368Oâ€™Droma M, Mgebrishvili N: On quantifying the benefits of SSPA linearization in UWC-136 systems.

*IEEE Trans. Sig. Process*2005, 7: 2470-2476. doi:10.1109/TSP.2005.849190Dardari D, Tralli V, Vaccari A: A theoretical characterization of nonlinear distortion effects in OFDM systems.

*IEEE Trans. Commun*2000, 10: 1755-1764. doi:10.1109/26.871400Schreurs D, Oâ€™Droma M, Goacher A, Gardinger M:

*RF Power Amplifier Behavioral Modelling*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Oâ€™Droma M, Mgebrishvili N: Signal modelling classes for linearized OFDM SSPA behavioral analysis.

*IEEE Commun. Lett*2005, 2: 127-129. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2005.02030Lei Y, Oâ€™Droma M: Behavioural analysis of internal mechanism of nonlinear OFDM signals. In

*IEEE Global Telecommunication Conference*. Hawaii; 30 November to 4 December 2009. doi:10.1109/GLOCOM.2009.5425495Lei Y, Oâ€™Droma M, Jin Y: A practical analysis and performance optimization in OSTBC based nonlinear MIMO-OFDM systems.

*IEEE Trans. Commun.*2014, 3: 930-938. doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2014.010414.130533Oâ€™Droma M, Meza S, Lei Y: New modified Saleh models for memoryless nonlinear power amplifier behavioural modelling.

*IEEE Commun. Lett*2009, 12: 1007-1009. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2009.12.0902222Oâ€™Droma M, Lei Y: A new Bessel-Fourier memoryless nonlinear power amplifier behavioral model.

*IEEE Micro. Wirel. Comp. Lett*2013, 1: 25-27. doi:10.1109/LMWC.2012.2236082

## Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the support from State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems and Networks, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University. The authors also wish to acknowledge the suggestions from Prof. MÃ¡irtÃn Oâ€™Droma in the Telecommunications Research Centre, University of Limerick, Ireland.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Additional information

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Yiming Lei, Mingke Dong contributed equally to this work.

## Authorsâ€™ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authorsâ€™ original submitted files for images.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Lei, Y., Dong, M. & Jin, Y. The sensitivity of modulation fidelity on PA envelope variation in OFDM transmitter systems.
*J Wireless Com Network* **2014**, 52 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2014-52

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1499-2014-52