Data aggregation of mobile M2M traffic in relay enhanced LTE-A networks
© Marwat et al. 2016
Received: 24 November 2015
Accepted: 5 April 2016
Published: 18 April 2016
Machine-to-machine (M2M) communication is becoming an increasingly essential part of mobile traffic and thus also a major focus of the latest 4G and upcoming 5G mobile networks. M2M communication offers various ubiquitous services and is one of the main enablers of the Internet-of-things (IoTs) vision. Nevertheless, the concept of mobile M2M communication has emerged due to the wide range, coverage provisioning, high reliability as well as decreasing costs of future mobile networks. Resultantly, M2M traffic poses drastic challenges to mobile networks, particularly due to the expected large number of devices sending small-sized data. Moreover, mobile M2M traffic is anticipated to degrade the performance of traditional cellular traffic due to inefficient utilization of the scarce radio spectrum. This paper presents a novel data aggregation and multiplexing scheme for mobile M2M traffic and thus focuses on the latest 3GPP (3 r d Generation Partnership Project) tong-term-evolution-advanced (LTE-A) networks. 3GPP standardized layer 3 inband Relay Nodes (RNs) are used to aggregate uplink M2M traffic by sharing the Physical Resource Blocks (PRBs) among several devices. The proposed scheme is validated through extensive system level simulations in an LTE-A based implementation for the Riverbed Modeler simulator. Our simulation results show that besides coverage extensions, RNs serve approximately 40 % more M2M devices with the proposed data multiplexing scheme compared to the conventional without multiplexing approach. Moreover, in this paper an analytical model is developed to compute the multiplexing transition probabilities. In the end, the simulation and analytical results of multiplexing transition probabilities are compared in order to analyze the multiplexing scheme.
The contest towards developing next-generation 5G networks has already started. Resultantly, an increasing interest is shown by several operators, service providers, automotive industry as well as academia to provide a general framework for 5G. On the one hand, the motivation behind the increasing interest in 5G is the thousand fold rise in mobile traffic expected in 2020 . On the other hand, supporting future massive machine-to-machine (M2M) communication is also one of the major focuses of 5G networks. Thus, massive M2M communication is considered as one of the potential horizontal topics in 5G networks . This increasing importance is due to the fact that the collaborative communication between intelligent systems through mobile networks has recently achieved a significant importance. One of the resultant emerging domains is mobile M2M communication. M2M communication is a pattern which identifies the evolving paradigm of interconnected devices communicating with each other without or with limited human interaction . Additionally, advancements in mobile M2M communication have also played a prominent role in improving human life standards by enabling numerous ubiquitous solutions towards the Internet-of-things (IoT) vision. The idea behind the increasing use of M2M devices is that devices are more valuable when these are networked. Similarly, the network attains more importance when the number of connected machines is larger.
The characteristics of M2M traffic differs from existing human-to-human/human-to-machine (H2H/H2M) traffic. The first detailed characterizations of M2M were performed in , in which the authors collected traffic data for 1 week from one of the major TIER-1 cellular service providers in the USA. The authors concluded that there is a significant difference between the characteristics of M2M and traditional mobile traffic. Their experimental results showed that a large part of the M2M traffic has a set of challenging characteristics such as small-sized data transmissions, group-based communication, time controlled, and delay-tolerant communication. Moreover, their findings showed that unlike conventional mobile traffic, M2M is an uplink dominant traffic. Additionally, existing mobile standards such as the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), the Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS), and LTE are providing services to numerous M2M applications. However, it is expected that the number of devices will approximately grow to 50 billion by the end of 2020, according to ERICSSON . Thus, current mobile standards are expected to run out of capacity and will not be able to support such a large number of devices. Resultantly, mobile M2M communication may not be facilitated proficiently.
Cellular standards were particularly designed and optimized to support broadband traffic with a relatively small number of UEs (Users Equipments) per cell. To support a high peak data rate and enable high mobility, 3GPP introduced LTE-A in Release 10 with some enhancements such as carrier aggregation (CA), massive multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) [6, 7], Coordinated multi-point (CoMP), and relaying in Release 11 . LTE-A introduces IP networks with improved system capacity, increased uplink and downlink peak data rates and scalable bandwidth. Therefore, LTE-A networks are expected to support future M2M data traffic . However, the dilemma is that M2M traffic patterns vary in diverse application domains and in most of the applications, the M2M device data is only a few bytes [9–11]. Thus, it is quite crucial to achieve full spectrum efficiency in the presence of a large number of devices with small-sized data packets.
Researchers as well as standardization bodies are currently working on proposals to support mobile M2M traffic efficiently without degrading the performance of traditional users such as voice/data connections. The major issue related to mobile M2M traffic is to support a potentially large number of devices for which the mobile networks such as LTE and LTE-A are not yet optimized. 3GPP has started working on evolving LTE-A in order to support M2M traffic efficiently. Till now, several open issues as well as M2M network architectures have been proposed by 3GPP and ETSI (European Telecommunication Standard Institute) in [12, 13], respectively. Additionally, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) has standardized 802.16p (for vehicular applications) and 802.16.1b to modify existing standards for supporting future M2M capillary networks. Additionally, major efforts related to cost and access schemes were accomplished by the two Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) projects namely EXpAnding LTE for Devices (EXALTED) , and Achieving LOw-LAtency in Wireless Communications (LOLA) . The Mobile and wireless communications Enablers for the Twenty-twenty (METIS 2020), one of the biggest EU (European Union) research projects also initiated to shape upcoming 5G networks by focusing on M2M communications. In METIS 2020, M2M is considered as a front line research topic by covering its radio link challenges . However, new and advanced schemes are still required to support the myriad of devices simultaneously sending small-sized data.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes existing issues in the conventional radio resource utilization for M2M traffic. Then, Section 3 presents an overview of data aggregation. The system model for the proposed data traffic aggregation scheme is discussed in Section 4. The simulation environment along with parameter settings is given in Section 5. Section 6 presents the simulation results and discussions. In Section 7, an analytical model is developed to analyze the data aggregation scheme in terms of the packet arrival and departure probabilities (multiplexing transition probabilities). In the end, conclusions and outlook are drawn in Section 8.
2 Problem statements
The distinctive characteristics of M2M traffic pose serious challenges for cellular service providers and mobile network researchers. The most challenging problem is the expected large number of small-sized data generated by a large number of M2M devices in the near future. Moreover, it is also observed that in most M2M applications, the group behavior is similar to that of the botnet, see , as a large number of devices will access the network simultaneously. Besides, several M2M applications such as logistics, intelligent transportation, and mobile e-healthcare demand mobility support. Existing mobile standards are neither designed to handle small-sized data efficiently nor to support simultaneous access of thousands of devices. Consequently, this will lead to congestion over the radio link. Thus, the current mobile standards must be revised in order to support a large number of devices. According to the 3GPP standardization, the smallest resource element for LTE/LTE-A is the PRB with a dimension of 180 kHz in the frequency domain and 1 ms (millisecond) in the time domain. Moreover, a PRB can transmit several hundred bits under favorable channel conditions . For instance, 712 bits are sent in a TTI (transmission time interval) with an MCS (modulation and coding scheme) of 26. However, allocating 1 PRB to a single device can significantly degrade PRB utilization [11, 17–19].
3 Literature review
Data aggregation has remained a potential research topic particularly in wireless sensor networks. It is generally applied to reduce the number of sensor transmissions and thus to improve the network lifetime. In recent years, notable research efforts have been made for the topic of data aggregation. For instance, authors of [20, 21] proposed aggregation tree algorithms to find aggregation node in order to improve network lifetime. In , authors explored the benefits of data-centric routing algorithms and proposed a routing algorithm based on the tree and query model. Furthermore, authors in  enhanced the network bandwidth by selecting multiple suitable aggregation nodes through clustering algorithms which reduce the number of transmitted packets to the gateway.
In order to reduce energy consumption, bandwidth efficiency and increased system throughput, data aggregation collects and accumulates data packets from multiple nodes before transmitting to the next hop. For instance, an energy-aware aggregation algorithm is proposed in  in which the authors discussed through experimental analysis that data aggregation improves the network lifetime by 80 %. On the other hand, the authors of  indicated the drawbacks of data aggregation such as increased transmission time. Resultantly, authors in  studied two timing control methods which include periodic per-hop and periodic simple. In the former case, packets are aggregated until the number of buffered packets reaches a maximum defined threshold. Whereas in the latter case, the aggregation node retrieves packets until the expiry of the timer. Besides, authors in  analyzed the effect of bufferbloat on delay and system throughput in IEEE 802.11n wireless networks. Their experimental results showed that large buffers can degrade the fairness in multi-hop networks based on parking lot. Similarly, authors in  proposed a queue management scheme called WQM for wireless networks which adapts the size of the buffer based on measured link features and network load.
In literature, limited research efforts have been made to study the impacts of data aggregation in the context of mobile M2M communication. For instance, authors in  evaluated the performance of data aggregation in terms of energy efficiency, thus to increase the lifetime of capillary M2M networks. However, the authors neglected the emerging mobile M2M applications in their work. Besides, authors in  proposed a method of bundling M2M data packets at the macro station also called Donor eNBs (DeNBs) to reduce the risks of congestion in backbone networks. However, authors completely neglected the possible risks of congestion over the radio link which can be a bottleneck due to the finite frequency spectrum.
Due to the unique characteristics of mobile M2M traffic such as high density of devices simultaneously sending small-sized payloads, data aggregation can notably improve the radio resource utilization over the radio link, and thus can significantly reduce the risks of network congestion. However, to the best of the authors knowledge, the influence of data aggregation on the bandwidth utilization in the context of mobile M2M communication has not yet been addressed in literature. This paper presents a novel data aggregation and multiplexing scheme by considering both periodic simple and period per-hop control methods, as discussed in . For this purpose, a recently 3GPP standardized wireless layer 3 inband RN is used for enhancing coverage and aggregating uplink M2M traffic.
4 System model
This section presents details of implementation and functioning of the proposed data aggregation and multiplexing scheme. Since the authors of  stated that M2M traffic is an uplink dominant traffic, therefore uplink M2M small-sized data packets are aggregated in this work. Moreover, in the simulation model, both periodic simple and periodic per-hop control methods discussed in  are implemented. Additionally, an analytical model is developed to analyze the proposed scheme in terms of multiplexing transition probabilities particularly in low-load scenarios. This is due to the fact that the multiplexing process does not affect packet delay as well as PRB utilization in high-load scenarios.
4.1 RNs implementation and scheduling
The W i,a (t) parameter indicating the quality of service (QoS) weight of bearer a of user i at time t of the weighted proportional fair (W-PF) as given in (1). The R min,a is the bit rate budget (target data rate) and τ max,a is the end-to-end delay budget (target delay) of QoS class of bearer a, R avgi,a (t) is the average throughput of bearer a and τ i,a (t) is the packet delay of bearer a of UE i, ρ a (t) is a variable with value set to, e.g., 10 if τ i,a (t) is above the threshold value of bearer a at time t (as the bearer packet delay has reached the threshold), otherwise equal to 1. The value 10 of ρ a (t) raises the metric value of bearer a by 10 times and ensures immediate scheduling.
In (2), the parameters related to bearer delay are eliminated from (1) due to the fact that in uplink data packet transmission, the information about packet delay at the packet data convergence protocol (PDCP) buffer of the UE (or RN) is not available at the DeNB. The buffer status report (BSR) provides information only about the length of the buffer at the eNodeB. Although, the length of the buffer can be used to estimate the delay , but since the scheduling scheme in the CQA scheduler is already designed to prioritize the delay-sensitive GBR bearers by creating a separate GBR bearer list, so the delay estimation is not critical. Hence, the delay estimation is not considered for the scheduling decisions. Furthermore, the RN MAC scheduler is designed to allocate radio resources to the UEs and M2M devices connected to the RN at the Uu link. The round robin scheduling approach is adopted for such type of M2M traffic. All the active devices ready to transmit packets are scheduled in a round robin fashion.
4.2 Proposed M2M data aggregation and multiplexing
The proposed approach of multiplexing significantly improves the PRB utilization . However, there are certain constraints regarding latency requirements of high priority M2M traffic such as emergency alerting. Each packet waits until the size of the buffer B reaches the size of (TBS −Un protocol overhead). In a highly loaded scenario, the waiting time is not long due to a high arrival rate. However, in a low-load scenario, there is a comparatively longer delay due to the low arrival rate. Consequently, the performance of delay sensitive M2M applications such as e-healthcare and emergency alerting can be degraded. To tackle this issue, an expiry timer T max is introduced. The timer is, e.g., set with a fixed value of 9 ms in the current implementation. This means that the buffer serves the aggregated packets after 9 ms at the latest. The value of the timer could also be adaptive, i.e., it can change its value adaptively according to priorities of the incoming packets. For this purpose, the algorithm must be fully aware of various priorities of M2M applications. The description of the proposed scheme is given in Algorithm 1.
The DeNB also serves the regular LTE-A traffic such as voice and video UEs. The DeNB takes into account the source of the incoming packets. If the packets are received from a standalone LTE-A user, then the PDCP of the DeNB forwards packets to the GTP for tunneling. After tunneling, the packets are routed towards the access gateway (aGW). On the other hand, if the packets are received from the RN, the data packets are sent to the GTP via IP and UDP for de-multiplexing. Later, the original standalone packets are sent to the aGW. Similarly, in downlink, the DeNB GTP recognizes the source and destination identities (IDs) of the incoming packets. If the destination ID of incoming packet belongs to an RN, then the packets belong to a user which is served by the RN. On the other hand, packets belong to a user which is directly served by the DeNB. The block diagram of the downlink data differentiation algorithm implemented at the DeNB is given in Fig. 3 (right).
5 RIVERBED simulation environment and parameter settings
Simulation parameters and settings
Donor eNBs (DeNBs)
7 eNBs with hexagonal coverage.
500 m inter-eNB distance.
Transmission power per PRB=26 dBm
Min. DeNB - UE distance
Maximum terminal power = 23 dBm
(regular UE and M2M device).
5 km/h (UEs)
Random way point (RWP)
Frequency reuse factor
No. of PRBs
QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM,
Path loss: 128.1+37.6l o g 10(R), R in km,
Slow fading: Log-normal shadowing,
correlation 1, deviation 8 dB,
Fast fading: 3GPP Pedestrian A.
PRBs for RN
5 PRBs are allocated to RN by DeNB
to evaluate PRB utilization.
1608 bits against MCS 16 and PRBs 5.
available service rate T B S− o v e r h e a d (bits/TTI),
1608 (T B S)−352 (o v e r h e a d)=1256 bits/TTI
M2M packet size
RN Uu PHY receives 262.4 bits per TTI.
RN Un PHY receives 656 bits per TTI.
multiplexing without timer, and
multiplexing with timer
Timer expiry values
Timer expiry values
4, 9, and 14 ms
for subsection 6.3
Type of RN
Video traffic model
Time (between frames)
M2M traffic model .
38 bytes at the device PDCP
6 Results and analysis
In this section, we discuss the simulation results in terms of coverage enhancement as well as efficient spectrum utilization with the proposed scheme.
6.1 Coverage enhancements
One of the major functionalities of the 3GPP LTE-A RNs includes coverage enhancements, especially for the UEs at the cell edge which usually experience poor channel conditions. The DeNB MAC scheduler allocates PRBs to each UE according to the received signal strength. The cell edge users usually experience poor signal strength which ultimately reduces the maximum utilization of the allocated PRBs. This inefficient utilization of PRBs significantly degrades the cell throughput. The RNs play a vital role in improving the QoS performance of the cell-edge UEs.
In order to evaluate the impact of relaying on the QoS performance of the cell-edge UEs, the scenarios are categorized into two groups namely direct-DeNB access and relay-based-DeNB access. In the first category, all the UEs communicate with DeNB directly. Whereas in the second category, an RN acts as an access point for the cell-edge UEs and later routes the UEs data to the DeNB. In both the categories, the UEs and RN are assumed to be stationary which results into non-varying channel conditions. The position of RN corresponds to MCS 16 with a TBS 1608 bits per TTI of 1 ms duration.
6.2 Efficient radio resource utilization
In this subsection, the performance of the proposed data traffic aggregation and multiplexing is evaluated. The scenarios are simulated according to three major groups. In the first group, M2M data packets are relayed in uplink without multiplexing. In the second group, the data packets from all the active M2M devices which are located in the proximity of the RN are aggregated at the Uu PDCP layer before being sent to the DeNB. However, only the periodic per-hop control scheme is used in which the large aggregated data packets are served when their size is equal to the available TBS − Un protocol overhead. In the third group, an expiry timer is introduced in order to limit the multiplexing delay especially in the low-load scenarios. In this case, the aggregated packet is served after T max at the latest (periodic simple approach).
All the above mentioned groups are further sub-categorized into various subscenarios. In the first subscenario, 200 M2M devices are placed in the proximity of the RN. The number of M2M devices is incremented by 200 in the subsequent subscenariors. The position of the RN corresponds to an MCS of 16 and a TBS of 1608 bits per TTI with the allocation of 5 PRBs by DeNB. The performance of the proposed scheme is computed in terms of mean number of PRBs used and packet E2E delay in uplink for all the aforementioned scenarios.
However, in case of multiplexing, the number of devices served by the RN nearly doubles. This is due to the fact that in the case of “no multiplexing”, each data packet contains an additional Un air interface overhead of GTP, UDP, IP and layer 2. The additional overhead causes an extra PRB usage and overall reduces the PRB utilization efficiency. Moreover, in low-load scenarios, the average number of PRBs used is slightly higher in the case of “multiplexing with timer”. This is due to the fact that the RN serves the traffic at the latest after 9 ms and thus the PRB is not necessarily used with its maximum capacity due to the low arrival rate. However, in high-load scenarios, the timer has almost no impact and nearly equal numbers of PRBs are used with and without timer.
Figure 10 depicts the simulation results of M2M mean packet E2E delay in all three aforementioned scenarios. The results show that the value of packet E2E delay is higher in the case of multiplexing for low loads. This increase in delay time is due to less arriving packets especially in the low-load scenarios. The buffer aggregates packets until its size + the additional RN Un overheads is equal to the offered load. However, the use of an expiry timer limits the delay by serving the aggregated packets at the latest after 9 ms. However, in high-load scenarios (e.g., 2000 devices) the E2E delay is slightly higher compared to the case of no multiplexing. This is due to high arrival rate and the buffer aggregates the incoming packets to make a large aggregated packet within less time. Moreover, the value of E2E delay is very large in fully loaded scenarios as depicted in Fig. 10, when the RN utilizes all five PRBs with the maximum capacity.
6.3 Impact of timer expiry, T max
In this subsection, we investigate the impact of timer expiry, T max on mean PRB utilization and E2E delay by varying input traffic. However, we only consider low-load scenarios due to the fact that the timer expiry has almost no affect on mean PRB utilization and E2E delay in high-load scenarios in the multiplexing process, as discussed earlier in Figs. 9 and 10. In general, the mean value of used PRBs decreases and E2E delay increases for larger values of the timer expiry. Additionally, this trade-off is heavily dependent on the arrival rate, as discussed earlier.
Similarly, Fig. 12 compares the simulation results of the mean E2E delay for the given timer expiry values. As discussed in the beginning, the larger values of waiting time, T max increase the mean packet E2E delay, particulaly in the low-load scenarios. However, the effect reduces with the larger values of N. For instance, in the low-load scenario when N=100, the given values of maximum waiting time introduce a mean E2E delay of 0.0045, 0.0070, and 0.0095 ms, respectively. Since the effect of timer on the multiplexing process decreases due to the increasing arrival rate, the mean E2E delay values are reduced to 0.00368, 0.00416, and 0.00419, respectively for N=1000. Furthermore, it is noted that the values of mean E2E delay for T max of 10 and 15 ms are almost similar. Moreover, the impact of timer expiry completely vanishes when input traffic load is increased beyond 1000, see Figs. 9 and 10.
7 Analytical modeling for multiplexing transition probabilities
List of symbols
Maximum waiting time for aggregation and multiplexing.
Complete number of PRBs.
Number of packets in the buffer at any time.
Fixed size of the packet (656 bits).
Total length of the buffer.
Probability of next arrival before multiplexing with k
Probability that multiplexing starts before next arrival.
where p 0=1.
Since radio spectrum will remain a scarce resource also in the future, new ideas for new traffic types such as M2M demand careful planning and evaluation. In addition, the IoT will drive new developments including new devices, applications as well as services. Thus, the future poses numerous challenges for all parties involved such as standardization bodies, network operators, and application providers.
This paper presents a data aggregation and multiplexing scheme for handling small-sized M2M traffic in order to improve LTE-A radio resource utilization. In the analysis, it is observed that the proposed scheme significantly improves the PRB utilization, particularly when no expiry timer, T max is considered in the low-load scenarios. However, in the high-load scenarios, the timer T max does not play any role and equal number of PRBs are used with and without an expiry timer. On average, approximately 40 % more M2M devices are served with the proposed multiplexing scheme. Given the simulation results, in the future recognizing narrowband M2M traffic could be a very important step for further bandwidth saving. Furthermore, the proposed scheme in this paper could be an efficient solution for handling such kind of bursty traffic.
In this work, M2M QoS is not considered, and all the devices are given equal priorities. Due to the wide application range, QoS provisioning in M2M communications is one of the most challenging tasks for cellular service providers as well as for mobile networks operators. As QoS provisioning is one of the major demands of the future mobile M2M applications such as e-healthcare and emergency alerting. Therefore, the data aggregation scheme can be upgraded by taking into account the QoS of several M2M applications. Furthermore, the data aggregation concept will be extended in the downlink.
We thank the International Graduate School for Dynamics in Logistics (IGS), doctoral training group of LogDynamics, University of Bremen, Germany, and EU programme Erasmus Mundus FUSION (Featured Europe and South Asia Mobility Network) Strand 1, Lot 11, Grant Agreement Reference number 2013-2541/001-011 EM Action 2 partnerships, for the financial support of this work.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- A Osseiran, V Braun, T Hidekazu, P Marsch, H Schotten, H Tullberg, MA Uusitalo, M Schellmann, in IEEE VTC Spring Workshop. The foundation of the mobile and wireless communications system for 2020 and beyond (IEEEDresden, Germany, 2013), pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
- METIS, Scenarios, requirements and KPIs for 5G mobile and wireless system (2013). Technical report, Deliverable Number ICT-317669-METIS/D1.1.Google Scholar
- Exalted, Expanding LTE for Devices. http://www.ict-exalted.eu/fileadmin/documents/EXALTED_WP2_D2.1.pdf. Accessed: 30 September 2013.
- MZ Shafiq, L Ji, AX Liu, J Pang, J Wang, in ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 40. A first look at cellular machine-to-machine traffic: large scale measurement and characterization (ACM New YorkNY, USA, 2012), pp. 65–76.Google Scholar
- ERICSSON, Towards 50 billion connected devices. Technical report (2010). http://www.ericsson.com/au/res/region_RASO/docs/2010/ericsson_50_billion_paper.pdf. Accessed: 30 November 2014.
- Y Mehmood, W Afzal, F Ahmad, U Younas, I Rashid, I Mehmood, in 19th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC). Large scaled multi-user mimo system so called massive mimo systems for future wireless communication networks (IEEEUK, London, 2013), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
- Y Mehmood, N Haider, W Afzal, U Younas, I Rashid, M Imran, in IEEE Malaysia International Conference on Communications (MICC). Impact of massive MIMO systems on future M2M communication (IEEEKuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2013), pp. 534–537.Google Scholar
- http://www.3gpp.org/technologies/keywords-acronyms/97-lte-advanced_links.html. Accessed: 28 May 2015.
- 3GPP, Standardization of machine-type communications. Technical report, V0.2.4 (2014). http://www.ericsson.com/au/res/region_RASO/docs/2010/ericsson_50_billion_paper.pdf. Accessed: 30 September 2015.
- 3GPP, System improvements for machine type communications (2011). Technical report, 3GPP TR 23.888.Google Scholar
- METIS, Novel radio link concepts and state of the art analysis (2013). Technical report, Deliverable Number ICT-317669-METIS/D2.2.Google Scholar
- 3GPP, Architecture enhancements to facilitate communications with packet data networks and applications (Release 13). Technical report, TS 23.682 V13.2.0 (2015).Google Scholar
- ETSI, Machine-to-machine communications (M2M), Functional architecture (2013). Technical report, ETSI TS 102 690 V2.1.1.Google Scholar
- Achieving LOw-LAtency in Wireless Communications (LOLA). http://www.ict-lola.eu/_links.html. Page Accessed: 30 June 2015.
- Mobile and wireless communications enablers for twenty-twenty 2020. https://www.metis2020.com/?doing_wp_cron=1440943491.5532760620117187500000_links.html. Accessed: 28 August 2015.
- 3GPP, Technical specification group radio access network: evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); Physical layer procedures (Release 9) (2010). Technical report, TS 36.213 V9.2.0.Google Scholar
- T Pötsch, SNK Marwat, Y Zaki, Görg C, in IEEE 6th Joint IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC). Influence of future M2M communication on the LTE system (IEEEDubai, UAE, 2013), pp. 1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Y Mehmood, SNK Marwat, T Pötsch, F Ahmad, C Görg, I Rashid, in LogDynamics International Conference (LDIC). Impact of machine-to-machine traffic on LTE data traffic performance (SpringerBremen, Germany, 2014), pp. 259–269.Google Scholar
- Y Mehmood, C Görg, M Muehleisen, Timm-Giel A, Mobile M2M communication architectures, upcoming challenges, applications, and future directions. EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw. 2015(1), 1–37 (2015).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- K Kalpakis, K Dasgupta, P Namjoshi, Maximum lifetime data gathering and aggregation in wireless sensor networks. Networks. 42(6), 697–716 (2003).MATHGoogle Scholar
- D Luo, X Zhu, X Wu, G Chen, in IEEE INFOCOM Proceedings. Maximizing lifetime for the shortest path aggregation tree in wireless sensor networks (IEEEShanghai, China, 2011), pp. 1566–1574.Google Scholar
- S Madden, MJ Franklin, JM Hellerstein, W Hong, TAG: A tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. ACM SIGOPS Operating Syst. Rev.36(SI), 131–146 (2002).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- V Pandey, A Kaur, N Chand, A review on data aggregation techniques in wireless sensor network. J. Electron Electr. Eng. 1(2), 1–8 (2010).Google Scholar
- L Mottola, GP Picco, MUSTER: Adaptive energy-aware multisink routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 10(12), 1694–1709 (2011).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- I Solis, K Obraczka, in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). The impact of timing in data aggregation for sensor networks (IEEEParis, France, 2004), pp. 3640–3645.Google Scholar
- A Showail, K Jamshaid, B Shihada, in IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). An empirical evaluation of bufferbloat in IEEE 802.11 n wireless networks (IEEEIstanbul, Turkey, 2014), pp. 3088–3093.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- A Showail, K Jamshaid, B Shihada, in Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Capacity Sharing Workshop. WQM: An aggregation-aware queue management scheme for IEEE 802.11 n based networks (ACM New YorkNY, USA, 2014), pp. 15–20.Google Scholar
- SY Tsai, SI Sou, MH Tsai, Reducing energy consumption by data aggregation in M2M networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 74(4), 1231–1244 (2014).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- SNS Jamadagni, RS Vaidya, SA Ganapathi, Method and system of transmitting packet data units of machine type communication devices over a network interface in a long term evolution network. Google Patents. US Patent App. 13/878,898 (2013). http://www.google.com/patents/US20130195017.
- 3GPP, Technical specification group radio access network: evolved universal terrestrial radio access (E-UTRA); Relay architectures for E-UTRA (LTE-Advanced) (2010). Technical report, TR 36.806 V9.0.0.Google Scholar
- A Baid, R Mad, A Sampath, in 10th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt). Delay estimation and fast iterative scheduling policies for LTE uplink (IEEETempe, Arizona, USA, 2012), pp. 89–96.Google Scholar
- Y Mehmood, SNK Marwat, Y Zaki, C Görg, A Timm-Giel, in 20 ITG Mobile Communication Conference. Evaluation of M2M data traffic aggregation in LTE-A uplink (VDEOsnabrück, Germany, 2015), pp. 24–29.Google Scholar
- Y Zaki, T Weerawardane, C Görg, A Timm-Giel, in OPNET Workshop. Long term evolution (LTE) model development within OPNET simulation environment (OPNET TechnologiesWashington DC, USA, 2011).Google Scholar
- G Ko, S Moon, A Ahmad, K Kim, Performance analysis of the ATM adaptation layer 2 (AAL2). Int. J. Electron. Commun. 58(3), 193–199 (2004).View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- IEEE 802.16p-11/0014, IEEE 802.16p Machine to machine (M2M) evaluation methodology document (EMD) (2010). Technical report, IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group.Google Scholar