 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Better than Rician: modelling millimetre wave channels as twowave with diffuse power
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking volume 2019, Article number: 21 (2019)
Abstract
This contribution provides experimental evidence for the twowave with diffuse power (TWDP) fading model. We have conducted two indoor millimetre wave measurement campaigns with directive horn antennas at both link ends. One horn antenna is mounted in a corner of our laboratory, while the other is steerable and scans azimuth and elevation. Our first measurement campaign is based on scalar network analysis with 7 GHz of bandwidth. Our second measurement campaign obtains magnitude and phase information; it is additionally sampled directionally at several positions in space. We apply Akaike’s information criterion to decide whether Rician fading sufficiently explains the data or the generalised TWDP fading model is necessary. Our results indicate that the TWDP fading hypothesis is favoured over Rician fading in situations where the steerable antenna is pointing towards reflecting objects or is slightly misaligned at lineofsight. We demonstrate TWDP fading in several different domains, namely, frequency, space, and time.
Introduction
Accurate modelling of wireless propagation effects is a fundamental prerequisite for a proper communication system design. After the introduction of the doubledirectional radio channel model [1], wireless propagation research (<6 GHz) started to model the wireless channel agnostic to the antennas used. More than a decade later, propagation research focusses now on millimetre wave bands to unlock the large bandwidths available in this regime [2–5]. At millimetre waves (mmWaves), omnidirectional antennas have small effective antenna areas, resulting in a high path loss [6–10]. To overcome this high path loss, researchers have proposed to apply highly directive antennas on both link ends [11–14]. Most researchers aim to achieve high directivity with antenna arrays [15–20] and a few with dielectric lenses [21–23]. When the link quality depends so much on the achieved beamforming gain, antennas must be considered as part of the wireless channel again. Smallscale fading is then influenced by the antenna.
According to Durgin [24, p. 137], “The use of directive antennas or arrays at a receiver, for example, amplifies several of the strongest multipath waves that arrive in one particular direction while attenuating the remaining waves. This effectively increases the ratio of specular to nonspecular received power, turning a Rayleigh or Rician fading channel into a TWDP fading channel.” The mentioned twowave with diffuse power (TWDP) fading channel describes this spatial filtering effect by two nonfluctuating receive signals together with many smaller diffuse components.
Related work
The authors of [25] investigated a simple wall scattering scenario and analysed how fading scales with various antenna directivities and different bandwidths. Increasing directivity [25], as well as increasing bandwidth [25, 26], results in an increased Rician Kfactor. The authors of [27] analysed fading at 28 GHz with high gain horn antennas on both link ends. They observe high Rician Kfactors even at nonlineofsight (NLOS). This effect is explained by spatial filtering of directive antennas, as they suppress many multipath components [25]. Outdoor measurements in [28, 29], show a graphical agreement with the Rice fit, but especially Fig. 10 in [29] might be better explained as TWDP fading.
TWDP fading has already successfully been applied to describe 60 GHz near body shadowing [30]. Furthermore, as quoted above, TWDP must be considered for arrays, as they act as spatial filters [24, 31]. While theoretical work on TWDP fading is already advanced [32–37], experimental evidence, especially at millimetre waves, is still limited. For enclosed structures, such as aircraft cabins and buses, the applicability of the TWDP model is demonstrated by Frolik [38–42]. A deterministic two ray behaviour in ray tracing data of mmWave traintoinfrastructure communications is shown in [43]. A further extension of the TWDPfading model, the socalled fluctuating tworay fading model, was also successfully applied to fit mmWave measurement data [44–46]. This model brings in another degree of freedom and allows for common shadowing of both specular waves. The wireless channels in this present study are unblocked; thus, this model is not considered here.
Our group has conducted two measurement campaigns [47, 48] to directionally analyse receive power and smallscale fading parameters for mmWaves. This contribution is based on the measurement data gathered in [47, 48].
Outline and contributions
With this contribution, we aim to bring scientific rigour to the smallscale fading analysis of millimetre wave indoor channels. We show in Section 2 —by means of an informationtheoretic approach [49] and null hypothesis testing [50]—that the TWDP model has evidence in mmWave communications.
We have conducted two measurement campaigns within the same laboratory with different channel sounding concepts. Our measurements are carried out in the Vband; the applied centre frequency is 60 GHz. For both measurement campaigns, 20 dBi horn antennas are used at the transmitter and at the receiver. The first measurement campaign (MC1) samples the channel in azimuth (φ) and elevation (θ), keeping the antenna’s (apparent) phase centre ([51, pp. 799]) at a fixed (x,y) coordinate. The transmitter is mounted in a corner of our laboratory. The sounded environment as well as the mechanical setups are explained in Section 3. For MC1, we sounded the channel in the frequency domain by aid of scalar network analysis, described in Section 4. These channel measurements span over 7 GHz bandwidth, supporting us to analyse fading in the frequency domain.
For the second measurement campaign (MC2), described in Section 5, we improved the setup mechanically and radio frequency (RF) wise. By adding another linear guide along the zaxis, we keep the antenna’s phase centre constant in (x,y,z) coordinate, irrespective of the antenna’s elevation. Furthermore, we changed the sounding concept to timedomain channel sounding. This approach allows us to utilise the time domain and to show channel impulse responses in Section 7. Additionally, by adjusting (x,y,z,φ,θ), we sample the channel in the spatial domain at all directions (φ,θ). These improvements enable us to show spatial correlations in Section 6, a further analysis tool to support the claims from MC1.
In summary, we demonstrate TWDP fading for directional mmWave indoor channels in the frequencydomain, in the spatialdomain, and in the timedomain.
Methodology—fading model identification
TWDP fading captures the effect of interference of two nonfluctuating radio signals and many smaller socalled diffuse signals [31]. The TWDP distribution degenerates to Rice if one of the two nonfluctuating radio signals vanishes. This is analogous to the wellknown Rice degeneration to the Rayleigh distribution with decreasing Kfactor. In the framework of model selection, TWDP fading, Rician fading, and Rayleigh fading are hence nested hypotheses [49]. Therefore, it is also obvious that among these alternatives, TWDP always allows the best possible fit of measurement data. Occam’s razor [52] asks to select, among competing hypothetical distributions, the hypothesis that makes the fewest assumptions. Different distribution functions are often compared via a goodnessoffit test [53]. Nevertheless, the authors of [54] argue that Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) [49, 55–57] is better suited for the purpose of choosing among fading distributions. Later on, the AIC was also used in [58–62]. The AIC can be seen as a form of Occam’s razor as it penalises the number of estimable parameters in the approximating model [49] and hence aims for parsimony.
Mathematical description of TWDP fading
An early form of TWDP fading was analysed in [32]. Durgin et al. [31] introduced a random phase superposition formalism. Later, Rao et al. [35] achieved a major breakthrough and found a description of TWDP fading as conditional Rician fading. For the benefit of the reader, we will briefly repeat some important steps of [35].
The TWDP fading model in the complexvalued baseband is given as:
where V_{1}≥0 and V_{2}≥0 are the deterministic amplitudes of the nonfluctuating specular components. The phases ϕ_{1} and ϕ_{2} are independent and uniformly distributed in (0,2π). The diffuse components are modelled via the law of large numbers as X+jY, where \(X,Y\sim \mathcal {N}\left (0,\sigma ^{2}\right)\). The Kfactor is the power ratio of the specular components to the diffuse components:
The parameter Δ describes the amplitude relationship among the specular components:
The Δparameter is bounded between 0 and 1 and equals 1 iff and only if both amplitudes are equal. The second moment of the envelope r=r_{complex} of TWDP fading is given as:
Expectation is denoted by \(\mathbb {E}\). For bounded amplitudes V_{1} and V_{2}, a clever choice of σ^{2} normalises Ω, that is Ω≡1. Starting from (4), by using (2) we arrive at:
Given (K,Δ,Ω≡1), the authors of [63] provide a formula for the amplitudes of both specular components:
Realworld measurement data have Ω≠1. To work with the formalism introduced above, we normalise the measurement data through estimating \(\hat {\Omega }\) by the method of moments. The second moment Ω of Rician fading and TWDP fading is merely a scale factor [64, 65]. Notably, we are more concerned with a proper fit of K and Δ. Generally, estimation errors on Ω propagate to K and Δ estimates. However, LopezFernandez et al. [64] achieved an almost asymptotically efficient estimator with a momentbased estimation of Ω.
Our envelope measurements are partitioned into 2 sets. We take the first set (r_{1},…,r_{n},…r_{N}) for parameter estimation of the tuple (K,Δ) as described in Section 2.2, and hypothesis testing as described in Section 2.3. The first set is carefully selected to obtain envelopes samples that are as independent as possible. The second set (r_{1},…,r_{m},…r_{M}) is the complement of the first set. We use the elements of the second set to estimate the second moment via:
where m is the sample index and M is the size of the second set. Partitioning is necessary to avoid biases through noise correlations of \(\hat {\Omega }\) and \(\left (\hat {K},\hat {\Delta }\right)\) [66].
By considering the estimate (7) as true parameter Ω, all distributions are parametrised by the tuple (K,Δ), solely. Example distributions are shown in Fig. 1. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the envelope of (1) is given in [35] as:
The Marcum Qfunction is denoted by Q_{1}(·,·). For Δ→0, Eq. (8) reduces to the wellknown Rice CDF:
It might sound tempting to have a second strong radio signal present; in fact, however, two waves can either superpose constructively or destructively and eventually lead to fading that is more severe than Rayleigh [38–42]. We observe the highest probability for deep fades for TWDP fading in Fig. 1.
Parameter estimation and model selection
Note that our model of TWDP fading (1) does not contain noise. Over our wide frequency range (in MC1, we have 7 GHz bandwidth), the receive noise power spectral density is not equal. A statistical noise description that is valid over our wide frequency range is frequencydependent. To avoid the burden of frequencydependent noise modelling, we only take measurement samples which lie at least 10 dB above the noise power and ignore noise in our estimation.
Having the envelope measurement data set (r_{1},…,r_{n},…r_{N}) at hand, we are seeking a distribution of which the observed realisations r_{n} appear most likely. To do so, we estimate the parameter tuple (K,Δ) via the maximum likelihood procedure:
We denote the probability density function (PDF) by f(·), n denotes the sample index, and N the size of the set. To solve (10), we first discretise K and Δ in steps of 0.05. Next, we calculate \(\frac {\partial F_{\text {TWDP}}(r ; K, \Delta)}{\partial r}\) for all parameters via numerical differentiation. Within this family of distributions, we search for the parameter vector maximising the loglikelihood function (10). For the optimal Rice fit, the maximum is searched within the parameter slice (K,Δ≡0). An exemplary fit of Rician and TWDP fading is shown in Fig. 2. As a reference, Rayleigh fading (K≡0, Δ≡0) is shown as well.
To select between Rician fading and TWDP fading, we employ Akaike’s information criterion (AIC). The AIC is a rigourous way to estimate the KullbackLeibler divergence, that is, the relative entropy based on the maximumlikelihood estimate [49]. Given the maximumlikelihood fitted parameter tuple (\(\hat {K}, \hat {\Delta }\)) of TWDP fading and Rician fading, we calculate the sample sizecorrected AIC [49, p. 66] for Rician fading (AIC_{R}) or TWDP fading (AIC_{T}):
where U is the model order. For Rician fading, the model order is U_{R}=1, since we estimate the Kfactor, only. For TWDP fading U_{T}=2, as Δ is estimated additionally. The second moment Ω (estimated already with a different data set before the parameter estimation) is not part of the ML estimation (10) and therefore not accounted in the model order U. We choose between Rician fading and TWDP fading based on the lower AIC.
Validation of the chosen model
Based on (11), one of the two distributions, Rice or TWDP, will always yield a better fit. To validate whether the chosen distributions really explains the data, we state the following statistical hypothesis testing problem:
The Boolean negation is denoted by ¬. Our statistical tool is the gtest [67, 68]^{Footnote 1}. At a significance level α, a null hypothesis is rejected if:
where O_{i} is the observed bin count in cell i and E_{i} is the expected bin count in cell i under the null hypothesis \(\mathcal {H}_{0}\). The cell edges are illustrated with vertical lines in Fig. 2. The cell edges are chosen, such that 10 observed bin counts fall into one cell. The estimated parameters of the model are denoted by e. For Rician fading, we estimate e=2 (Ω,K) parameters, and for TWDP fading, we estimate e=3 (Ω,K,Δ) parameters in total. The (1−α) quantile of the chisquare distribution with m−e degrees of freedom is denoted by \(\chi _{(1\alpha, me)}^{2}\). The prescribed confidence level is 1−α=0.01.
Floor plan and setups for MC1 and MC2
Our measured environment is a mixed office and laboratory room. There are office desks in the middle of the room, and at the window side, there are laboratory desks (see Fig 3.). The main interacting objects in our channel are office desks, a metallic fridge, a wall, and the surface of the laboratory desk. These objects are all marked in Fig. 3.
Our directional measurements are carried out by using the traditional approach of mechanically steered directional antennas [69, 70]. As directional antennas, 20 dBi conical horn antennas with an 18° 3 dB opening angle are used. Our polarisation is determined by the LOS polarisation. When TX and RX are facing each other at LOS, the polarisation is copolarised and the Efield is orthogonal to the floor. In MC1, the essential mechanical adaptation to the stateoftheart directional channel sounding setup [71, 72] is that the elevationoverazimuth positioner is mounted on an xypositioning stage. Thereby, we compensate for all linear translations caused by rotations and keep the phase centre of the horn antenna always at the same (x,y) coordinate, see Fig. 4. The z coordinate is roughly 70 cm above ground but varies 13 cm for different elevation angles.
For MC2, we add another linear guide along the zaxis to compensate for all introduced offsets. The horn antenna’s phase centre is thereby lifted upwards by 1 m. Now, we are able to fix the phase centre of the horn antenna at a specific (x,y,z) coordinate in space. The whole mechanical setup and the fixed phase centre is illustrated in Fig. 5.
MC1: Scalarvalued wideband measurements
A wireless channel is said to be smallscale fading, if the receiver (RX) cannot distinguish between different multipath components (MPCs). Depending on the position of the transmitter (TX), the position of the RX and the position of the interacting components, the MPCs interfere constructively or destructively [73, pp. 27]. The fading concept only asks for a single carrier frequency, whose MPCs arrive with different phases at the RX. By spatial sampling, a statistical description of the fading process is found.
In MC1, the spatial (x,y) coordinate (of TX and RX) is kept constant. Different phases of the impinging MPCs are realised by changing the TX frequency over a bandwidth of 7 GHz. Thereby, we implicitly rely on frequency translations to estimate the parameters of the spatial fading process.
Measurement setup
We measure the forward transfer function with an Rohde and Schwarz R&S ZVA24 vector network analyser (VNA). The VNA can measure directly up to 24 GHz. For mmWave upconversion and downconversion, we employ modules from Pasternack [74]. They are based on radio frequency integrated circuits described in [75]. The upconverter module and the downconverter module are operating builtin synthesiser phaselocked loops (PLLs), where the local oscillator (LO) frequency is calculated as:
The scaling factor of the synthesiser PLL counters is denoted by s_{PLL}. For f_{LO}≈60 GHz, the scaling factor is s_{PLL}=120. To avoid crosstalk, we measure the transfer function via the conversion gain (mixer) measurement option of our VNA and operate the transmitter and receiver at different baseband frequencies: 601 to 1100 MHz and 101 to 600 MHz. The setup is shown in Fig. 6.
Receive power and fading distributions
In Fig. 7, we show the estimated received mean power of 7 GHz bandwidth, normalised to the maximum RX power, that is
As already mentioned in Section 2, we partition the frequency measurements into two sets. The normalised receive power is calculated according to (7), with frequency samples spaced by 2.5 MHz. Every tenth sample is left out as these samples are used for fitting of (K,Δ) and hypothesis testing. We display the results via a stereographic projection from the south pole and use tan(θ/2) as azimuthal projection. All sampling points, lying at least 10 dB above the noise level, are subject of our study. They are displayed with red, white, or black markers. Sampling points where we decided for TWDP fading, following the procedure described in Section 2, are marked with red diamonds. White circles mark points for which AIC favours Rician fading. Four points are marked black. These points failed the null hypothesis test, and we neither argue for Rician fading nor for TWDP fading. TWDP fading occurs whenever the lineofsight (LOS)link is not perfectly aligned or if the interacting object cannot be described by a pure reflection.
In Fig. 8, the Kparameter of the selected hypothesis is illustrated. Figure 8 shows either the Rician Kfactor or the TWDP Kfactor, depending on the selected hypothesis. Note that their definitions are fully equivalent. For Rician fading, the amplitude V_{2} in (1) is zero by definition. Whenever the RX power is high, the Kfactor is high. Below the Kestimate, the estimate of Δ is shown. Here again, by definition, Δ≡0 whenever we decide for Rician fading. For interacting objects, the parameter Δ tends to be close to one. Note, that decisions based on AIC select TWDP fading mostly when Δ is above 0.3. Smaller Δ values do not change the distribution function sufficiently to justify a higher model order.
MC2: Vectorvalued spatial measurements
In contrast to MC1, we no longer rely on frequency translations and are indeed sampling the channel in space. The fading results we present in Section 5.3 are evaluated at a single frequency. Fading is hence determined by the obtained spatial samples, exclusively.
Measurement setup
At the transmitter side, a 2GHz wide waveform is produced by an arbitrary waveform generator (AWG). A multitone waveform (OFDM) with Newman phases [76–78] is applied as sounding signal. The signal has 401 tones (subcarriers) with a spacing of 5 MHz. This large spacing assures that our system is not limited by phase noise [79]. The TX sequence is repeated 2 000 times to obtain a coherent processing gain of 33 dB for i.i.d. noise. The Pasternack upconverter (the same as in MC1) shifts the baseband sequence to 60 GHz. The 20 dBi conical horn antenna, together with the upconverter is mounted on a five axis positioner to directionally steer them. As receiver, a signal analyser (SA) (R&S FSW67) with a 2GHz analysis bandwidth is used. The received inphase and quadrature (IQ) baseband samples are obtained from the SA. The whole system is sketched in Fig. 9.
In MC2, for feasibility reasons, TX and RX switch places compared to MC1. The RX in form of the SA is put onto the laboratory table. The RX 20 dBi conical horn antenna is directly mounted at the RF input of the SA. The SA is located on a table close to a corner of the room; the RX antenna is not steered.
Similar to the setups of [80–83], proper triggering between the arbitrary waveform generator and the SA ensures a stable phase between subsequent measurements.
Receive power
For the calculation of the RX power, averaged over 2 GHz bandwidth, we perform a sweep through azimuth and elevation at a single coordinate. The LOS and wall reflection from MC1 are still visible in Fig. 10. Fading is evaluated at a single frequency in the subsection below. Nevertheless, we already indicate fading distributions by markers in Fig. 10 in order to better orient ourselves later on.
As the steerable horn antenna is above the office desks and the fridge level, these interacting objects do not become apparent. In case the steerable TX does not hit the RX at LOS accurately, the table surface acts as reflector and a TWDP model explains the data. For wall reflections, with nonideal alignment, TWDP also explains the data best.
Fading distributions
To obtain different spatial realisations, with the horn antenna pointing into the same direction, the coordinate of the apparent phase centre is moved to (x,y,z) positions uniformly distributed within a cube of side length 2.8λ (see Fig. 11). We realise a set of 9×9×9=729 directional measurements. This results in a spacing between spatial samples of 0.35λ in each direction. Although λ/2 sampling is quite common [25, 27], we choose the sampling frequency to be coprime with the wavelength, to circumvent periodic effects [84]. We restrict our spatial extend to avoid changes in largescale fading. Only at directions with strong reception levels spatial sampling is performed^{Footnote 2}. Similar as in the previous section, we partition the measurements into 2 sets. The partitioning is made according to a 3D chequerboard pattern. The first set is used for the estimation of the second moment \(\hat {\Omega }\), and the second set is used for the parameter tuple (K,Δ).
The best fitting Kfactors, in both regions with strong reception, are illustrated in Fig. 12, top part. Below the Δparameters are provided. Remember, the RX in form of an SA is put on the laboratory table. In case the TX is not perfectly aligned, a reflection from the table surface yields a fading statistic captured by the TWDP model. The interaction with the wall, similar to Fig. 8, has again regions best modelled via TWDP fading.
MC2: Efficient computation of the spatial correlation
The wall reflection from the previous section is now subject to a more detailed study. Our spatial samples are used to show spatial correlations among the drawn samples.
Our threedimensional sampling problem, see again Fig. 11, is treated via twodimensional slicing. For the calculation of the spatial (2D) autocorrelation function, we apply the Wiener–Khintchine–Einstein theorem that relates the autocorrelation function of a widesensestationary random process to its power spectrum [85]. In two dimensions, this theorem reads [86, 87]:
where C is the 2Dautocorrelation and S is the power spectral density of a 2D signal. The operator \(\mathcal {F}_{2D}\) denotes the 2D Fourier transform. We calculate all 2D autocorrelation functions C^{(z,f)} of one x−y slice at height z at a single frequency f through
The symbols ⊙ denotes the Hadamard multiplication. The operator conj{·} denotes complex conjugation. To ensure a realvalued autocorrelation matrix (instead of a generally complex representation [87]), from the complexvalued channel samples, only the real parts ℜ{·} are taken. The spatial autocorrelation of the imaginary parts are identical. One could also analyse the magnitude and phase individually. While the correlation of the magnitude stays almost at 1, the phase correlation patterns are similar to those of the real part.
The 2D Fourier transform \(\mathcal {F}_{2D}\) is realised via a 2D discrete Fourier transform (DFT). The 2D DFT is calculated via a multiplication with the DFT matrix D from the left and the right. To mimic a linear convolution with the DFT, zero padding is necessary. We hence take the matrix \({\widetilde {\boldsymbol {H}}}^{(z,f)}\)
Furthermore, the finite spatial extend of our samples acts as rectangular window. The rectangular window leads to a triangular envelope of the the autocorrelation function. This windowed spatial correlation is denoted by:
To compensate the windowing effect, we calculate the spatial correlation of the rectangular window, constructed in accordance to (18):
The matrix 𝟙 denotes the allones matrix. Matrix S compensates the truncation effect of the autocorrelation through elementwise (Hadamard) division, denoted by ⊘. Finally, the efficient computation of the spatial correlation (17) reads:
At a distance of 0.35λ, the measurement data is still correlated; therefore, we are able to view our correlation results on the finer, interpolated grid. The interpolation factor is 20. That means that our spatial correlations are shown on a grid of 0.35λ/20=0.0175λ distance. The very efficient implementation of (20) is applied to all (parallel) 2D slices and to all frequencies. All realisations in z and f are averaged:
Furthermore, we plot onedimensional autocorrelation functions, evaluated along x and y, together with their twodimensional representations. We provide two spatial correlation plots evaluated at an azimuth angle of φ=340° and φ=160° in Fig. 13, both at an elevation angle of θ=110°. The bottom part of Fig. 13 shows a correlation pattern dominated by a single wave. The spatial correlation above shows an interference pattern, which is intuitively explained by a superposition of two plane waves. The one dimensional correlations, evaluated either at the xaxis or at the yaxis, show this oscillatory behaviour as well.
MC2: Timegated fading results
To confirm that our observations are not artefacts of our measurement setup, for example backlobes of the horn antenna, we now study the wireless channel in the time domain. Our 2GHz wide measurements from MC2 allow for a time resolution of approximately 0.5 ns. This corresponds to a spatial resolution of 15 cm. We plot the channel impulse responses (CIRs) as a function of distance, namely the LOS excess length Δs, that is:
The scatterplot of the CIRs for φ=160° is shown in Fig. 14. The LOS CIR at φ=340° is displayed as reference as well. The steerable TX is positioned more than a metre apart from the wall. This amounts in an excess distance of approximately two to three metres. At this excess distance, a cluster of multipath components is present. Note, if the horn antenna points towards the wall, the wave emitted by the backlobe of the horn antenna is received at zero excess distance. Still, the receive power of the backlobe is far below the components arriving from the wall reflection. Fading is hence determined by the wall scattering behaviour.
The grayhighlighted region of Fig. 14 (top part) shows a reflection cluster that corresponds to the excess distance of the wall reflection. The distributions of each channel tap are represented by a violin plot in Fig. 15. A violin plot illustrates the distribution estimated via Gaussian kernels [88]. Figure 15 clearly demonstrates that the TWDPdecided distributions have multiple modes. The AIC decisions are plotted as markers at the mean power levels.
We evaluated the fading statistic in space for φ=160° at the channel tap corresponding to approximately 2.5 m excess distance. This channel tap is mid in the cluster belonging to the wall reflection. Fig. 16 clearly shows a TWDP fading behaviour, confirmed by AIC.
Conclusion
We demonstrate, by means of model selection and hypothesis testing, that TWDP fading explains observed indoor millimetre wave channels. Rician fits of reported studies must be considered with caution. As two exemplary fits, in Figs. 2 and 16, show Rician Kfactors tend to be much smaller than their TWDP companions. There is more power in the specular components than is predicted by the Rician fit. The TWDP fading fit accounts for a possible cancellation of two specular waves. Our results are verified through two independent measurement campaigns. For MC1 and MC2 we even used different RF hardware. While MC1 was limited to results in the frequency domain, MC2 allowed a careful study in the spatialdomain and the timedomain.
Having this strong evidence at hand, we claim that the TWDP fading model is more accurate to describe mmWave indoor channels. The flexibility of this model allows furthermore to obtain Rician fading (Δ≡0) and Rayleigh fading (K≡0) results with the same channel model.
Notes
 1.
The wellknown chisquared test approximates the gtest via a local linearisation [89].
 2.
Spatial sampling for all directions takes more than 3 days.
Abbreviations
 AIC:

Akaike’s information criterion
 AWG:

Arbitrary waveform generator
 BER:

Bit error ratio
 CDF:

Cumulative distribution function
 CIR:

Channel impulse response
 DFT:

Discrete Fourier transform
 IQ:

Inphase and quadrature
 LO:

Local oscillator
 LOS:

Lineofsight
 MC1:

First measurement campaign
 MC2:

Second measurement campaign
 mmWave:

Millimetre wave
 MPC:

Multipath component
 NLOS:

Nonlineofsight
 PDF:

Probability density function
 PLL:

Phaselocked loop
 RX:

Receiver
 SA:

Signal analyser
 RF:

Radio frequency
 SNR:

Signaltonoise ratio
 TWDP:

Twowave with diffuse power
 TX:

Transmitter
 VNA:

Vector network analyser
References
 1
M. Steinbauer, A. F. Molisch, E. Bonek, The doubledirectional radio channel. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag.43(4), 51–63 (2001).
 2
C. R. Anderson, T. S. Rappaport, Inbuilding wideband partition loss measurements at 2.5 and 60 GHz. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.3(3), 922–928 (2004).
 3
N. Moraitis, P. Constantinou, Measurements and characterization of wideband indoor radio channel at 60 GHz. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.5(4), 880–889 (2006).
 4
S. Geng, J. Kivinen, X. Zhao, P. Vainikainen, Millimeterwave propagation channel characterization for shortrange wireless communications. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.58(1), 3–13 (2009).
 5
K. Wangchuk, K. Umeki, T. Iwata, P. Hanpinitsak, M. Kim, K. Saito, J. i. Takada, Double directional millimeter wave propagation channel measurement and polarimetric cluster properties in outdoor urban picocell environment. IEICE Trans. Commun.100(7), 1133–1144 (2017).
 6
M. Peter, W. Keusgen, R. J. Weiler, in Proc. of 9th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). On path loss measurement and modeling for millimeterwave 5G (IEEELisbon, 2015), pp. 1–5.
 7
M. Peter, R. J. Weiler, B. Göktepe, W. Keusgen, K. Sakaguchi, Channel measurement and modeling for 5G urban microcellular scenarios. Sensors. 16(8), 1330 (2016).
 8
M. K. Samimi, T. S. Rappaport, G. R. MacCartney, Probabilistic omnidirectional path loss models for millimeterwave outdoor communications. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett.4(4), 357–360 (2015).
 9
S. Deng, M. K. Samimi, T. S. Rappaport, in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW). 28 GHz and 73 GHz millimeterwave indoor propagation measurements and path loss models (IEEELondon, 2015), pp. 1244–1250.
 10
G. R. MacCartney, T. S. Rappaport, M. K. Samimi, S. Sun, Millimeterwave omnidirectional path loss data for small cell 5G channel modeling. IEEE Access. 3:, 1573–1580 (2015).
 11
W. Roh, J. Y. Seol, J. Park, B. Lee, J. Lee, Y. Kim, J. Cho, K. Cheun, F. Aryanfar, Millimeterwave beamforming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: Theoretical feasibility and prototype results. IEEE Commun. Mag.52(2), 106–113 (2014).
 12
S. Hur, T. Kim, D. J. Love, J. V. Krogmeier, T. A. Thomas, A. Ghosh, Millimeter wave beamforming for wireless backhaul and access in small cell networks. IEEE Trans. Commun.61(10), 4391–4403 (2013).
 13
S. Sun, T. S. Rappaport, R. W. Heath, A. Nix, S. Rangan, MIMO for millimeterwave wireless communications: Beamforming, spatial multiplexing, or both?IEEE Commun. Mag.52(12), 110–121 (2014).
 14
Z. Pi, F. Khan, An introduction to millimeterwave mobile broadband systems. IEEE Commun. Mag.49(6), 101–107 (2011).
 15
R. W. Heath, N. GonzalezPrelcic, S. Rangan, W. Roh, A. M. Sayeed, An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Sign. Process.10(3), 436–453 (2016).
 16
J. G. Andrews, T. Bai, M. N. Kulkarni, A. Alkhateeb, A. K. Gupta, R. W. Heath, Modeling and analyzing millimeter wave cellular systems. IEEE Trans. Commun.65(1), 403–430 (2017).
 17
A. Alkhateeb, O. El Ayach, G. Leus, R. W. Heath, Channel estimation and hybrid precoding for millimeter wave cellular systems. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Sign. Process.8(5), 831–846 (2014).
 18
M. N. Kulkarni, A. Ghosh, J. G. Andrews, A comparison of MIMO techniques in downlink millimeter wave cellular networks with hybrid beamforming. IEEE Trans. Commun.64(5), 1952–1967 (2016).
 19
E. Zöchmann, S. Schwarz, M. Rupp, in Proc. of IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM). Comparing antenna selection and hybrid precoding for millimeter wave wireless communications (IEEERio de Janerio, 2016), pp. 1–5.
 20
S. Pratschner, S. Caban, S. Schwarz, M. Rupp, in Proc. of 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO). A mutual coupling model for massive MIMO applied to the 3GPP 3D channel model (IEEEKos, 2017), pp. 623–627.
 21
J. Brady, N. Behdad, A. M. Sayeed, Beamspace MIMO for millimeterwave communications: System architecture, modeling, analysis, and measurements. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.61(7), 3814–3827 (2013).
 22
Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, Millimeter wave MIMO with lens antenna array: A new path division multiplexing paradigm. IEEE Trans. Commun.64(4), 1557–1571 (2016).
 23
Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, Costeffective millimeterwave communications with lens antenna array. IEEE Wirel. Commun.24(4), 81–87 (2017).
 24
G. D. Durgin, Spacetime Wireless Channels (Prentice Hall Professional, Upper Saddle River, 2003).
 25
D. Dupleich, N. Iqbal, C. Schneider, S. Haefner, R. Müller, S. Skoblikov, J. Luo, R. Thomä, in Proc. of 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP). Investigations on fading scaling with bandwidth and directivity at 60 GHz (IEEEParis, 2017), pp. 3375–3379.
 26
N. Iqbal, C. Schneider, J. Luo, D. Dupleich, R. Müller, S. Haefner, R. S. Thomä, in Proc. of 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP). On the stochastic and deterministic behavior of mmWave channels (IEEEParis, 2017), pp. 1813–1817.
 27
M. K. Samimi, G. R. MacCartney, S. Sun, T. S. Rappaport, in Proc. of Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring). 28 GHz millimeterwave ultrawideband smallscale fading models in wireless channels (IEEENanjing, 2016), pp. 1–6.
 28
S. Sun, H. Yan, G. R. MacCartney, T. S. Rappaport, in Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). Millimeter wave smallscale spatial statistics in an urban microcell scenario (IEEEParis, 2017), pp. 1–7.
 29
T. S. Rappaport, G. R. MacCartney, S. Sun, H. Yan, S. Deng, Smallscale, local area, and transitional millimeter wave propagation for 5G communications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.65(12), 6474–6490 (2017).
 30
T. Mavridis, L. Petrillo, J. Sarrazin, A. BenlarbiDelai, P. De Doncker, Nearbody shadowing analysis at 60 GHz. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.63(10), 4505–4511 (2015).
 31
G. D. Durgin, T. S. Rappaport, D. A. De Wolf, New analytical models and probability density functions for fading in wireless communications. IEEE Trans. Commun.50(6), 1005–1015 (2002).
 32
R. Esposito, L. Wilson, Statistical properties of two sine waves in Gaussian noise. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 19(2), 176–183 (1973).
 33
S. H. Oh, K. H. Li, BER performance of BPSK receivers over twowave with diffuse power fading channels. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.4(4), 1448–1454 (2005).
 34
S. A. Saberali, N. C. Beaulieu, New expressions for TWDP fading statistics. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett.2(6), 643–646 (2013).
 35
M. Rao, F. J. LopezMartinez, M. S. Alouini, A. Goldsmith, MGF approach to the analysis of generalized tworay fading models. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.14(5), 2548–2561 (2015).
 36
S. Schwarz, Outage investigation of beamforming over randomphase finitescatterer MISO channels. IEEE Signal Proc. Lett.24(7), 1029–1033 (2017).
 37
S. Schwarz, in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTCFall). Outagebased multiuser admission control for randomphase finitescatterer MISO channels (Montreal, 2017), pp. 1–5.
 38
J. Frolik, A case for considering hyperRayleigh fading channels. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.6(4), 1235–1239 (2007).
 39
J. Frolik, On appropriate models for characterizing hyperRayleigh fading. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.7(12), 5202–5207 (2008).
 40
J. Frolik, T. M. Weller, S. DiStasi, J. Cooper, A compact reverberation chamber for hyperRayleigh channel emulation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.57(12), 3962–3968 (2009).
 41
D. W. Matolak, J. Frolik, WorsethanRayleigh fading: Experimental results and theoretical models. IEEE Commun. Mag.49(4), 140–146 (2011).
 42
L. Bakir, J. Frolik, Diversity gains in tworay fading channels. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.8(2), 968–977 (2009).
 43
E. Zöchmann, K. Guan, M. Rupp, in Proc. of Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC). Tworay models in mmWave communications, (2017), pp. 1–5.
 44
J. M. RomeroJerez, F. J. LopezMartinez, J. F. Paris, A. J. Goldsmith, The fluctuating tworay fading model: Statistical characterization and performance analysis. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.16(7), 4420–4432 (2017).
 45
J. Zhang, W. Zeng, X. Li, Q. Sun, K. P. Peppas, New results on the fluctuating tworay model with arbitrary fading parameters and its applications. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.67(3), 2766–2770 (2018).
 46
W. Zeng, J. Zhang, S. Chen, K. P. Peppas, B Ai, Physical layer security over fluctuating tworay fading channels. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.67(9), 8949–8953 (2018).
 47
E. Zöchmann, M. Lerch, S. Caban, R. Langwieser, C. Mecklenbräuker, M. Rupp, in Proc. of IEEE Topical Conference on Antennas and Propagation in Wireless Communications (APWC). Directional evaluation of receive power, Rician Kfactor and RMS delay spread obtained from power measurements of 60 GHz indoor channels, (2016), pp. 1–4.
 48
E. Zöchmann, M. Lerch, S. Pratschner, R. Nissel, S. Caban, M. Rupp, in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTCFall). Associating spatial information to directional millimeter wave channel measurements, (2017), pp. 1–5.
 49
K. P. Burnham, D. R. Anderson, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Informationtheoretic Approach (Springer, New York, 2003).
 50
R. W. Frick, The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychol. Methods. 1(4), 379 (1996).
 51
C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design (Wiley, Hoboken, 2005).
 52
J. O. Berger, W. H. Jefferys, The application of robust Bayesian analysis to hypothesis testing and Occam’s razor. J. Ital. Stat. Soc.1(1), 17–32 (1992).
 53
A. MaydeuOlivares, C. GarciaForero, Goodnessoffit testing. Int. Encycl. Educ.7(1), 190–196 (2010).
 54
U. G. Schuster, H. Bolcskei, Ultrawideband channel modeling on the basis of informationtheoretic criteria. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.6(7), 2464–2475 (2007).
 55
H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 19(6), 716–723 (1974).
 56
T. M. Ludden, S. L. Beal, L. B. Sheiner, Comparison of the Akaike information criterion, the Schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm.22(5), 431–445 (1994).
 57
K. P. Burnham, D. R. Anderson, Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res.33(2), 261–304 (2004).
 58
R. He, A. F. Molisch, F. Tufvesson, Z. Zhong, B. Ai, T. Zhang, Vehicletovehicle propagation models with large vehicle obstructions. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.15(5), 2237–2248 (2014).
 59
T. Santos, F. Tufvesson, A. F. Molisch, Modeling the ultrawideband outdoor channel: Model specification and validation. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.9(6), 1987–1997 (2010).
 60
R. He, Z. Zhong, B. Ai, G. Wang, J. Ding, A. F. Molisch, Measurements and analysis of propagation channels in highspeed railway viaducts. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.12(2), 794–805 (2013).
 61
K. Guan, Z. Zhong, B. Ai, T. Kürner, Propagation measurements and modeling of crossing bridges on highspeed railway at 930 MHz. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.63(2), 502–517 (2014).
 62
R. He, Z. Zhong, B. Ai, J. Ding, Y. Yang, A. F. Molisch, Shortterm fading behavior in highspeed railway cutting scenario: Measurements, analysis, and statistical models. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.61(4), 2209–2222 (2013).
 63
D. Kim, H. Lee, J. Kang, Comments on “Nearbody shadowing analysis at 60 GHz”. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.65(6), 3314–3314 (2017).
 64
J. LopezFernandez, L. MorenoPozas, F. J. LopezMartinez, E. MartosNaya, Joint parameter estimation for the twowave with diffuse power fading model. Sensors. 16(7), 1014 (2016).
 65
J. LopezFernandez, L. MorenoPozas, E. MartosNaya, F. J. LópezMartínez, in Proc. of the 84th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTCFall). Momentbased parameter estimation for the twowave with diffuse power fading model (IEEEMontreal, 2016), pp. 1–5.
 66
A. S. Goldberger, Econometric Theory (Wiley, New York, 1964).
 67
J. H. McDonald, Handbook of Biological Statistics vol. 2 (Sparky House Publishing Baltimore, MD, Baltimore, 2009).
 68
B. Woolf, The log likelihood ratio test (the gtest): Methods and tables for tests of heterogeneity in contingency tables. Ann. Hum. Genet.21(4), 397–409 (1957).
 69
Q. H. Spencer, B. D. Jeffs, M. A. Jensen, A. L. Swindlehurst, Modeling the statistical time and angle of arrival characteristics of an indoor multipath channel. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.18(3), 347–360 (2000).
 70
G. D. Durgin, V. Kukshya, T. S. Rappaport, Wideband measurements of angle and delay dispersion for outdoor and indoor peertopeer radio channels at 1920 MHz. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.51(5), 936–944 (2003).
 71
F. Fuschini, S. Häfner, M. Zoli, R. Müller, E. M. Vitucci, D. Dupleich, M. Barbiroli, J. Luo, E. Schulz, V. DegliEsposti, R. S. Thomä, Analysis of inroom mmWave propagation: Directional channel measurements and ray tracing simulations. J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves. 38(6), 727–744 (2017).
 72
J. Vehmas, J. Jarvelainen, S. L. H. Nguyen, R. Naderpour, K. Haneda, in Proc. of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTCFall). Millimeterwave channel characterization at Helsinki airport in the 15, 28, and 60 GHz bands, (2016).
 73
A. F. Molisch, Wireless Communications vol. 34 (Wiley, Chichester, 2012).
 74
Pasternack 60 GHz Transmitter and 60 GHz Receiver Modules. https://www.pasternack.com/60ghzmodulescategory.aspx.
 75
P. Zetterberg, R. Fardi, Open source SDR frontend and measurements for 60GHz wireless experimentation. IEEE Access. 3:, 445–456 (2015).
 76
S. Sangodoyin, J. Salmi, S. Niranjayan, A. F. Molisch, in Proc. of Antennas and Propagation Conference (EUCAP). Realtime ultrawideband MIMO channel sounding (IEEEPrague, 2012).
 77
M. Kim, H. K. Pham, Y. Chang, J. i. Takada, in Proc. of Global Symposium on Millimeter Wave (GSMM). Development of lowcost 60GHz millimeterwave channel sounding system, (2013).
 78
E. Zöchmann, C. Mecklenbräuker, M. Lerch, S. Pratschner, M. Hofer, D. Löschenbrand, J. Blumenstein, S. Sangodoyin, G. Artner, S. Caban, T. Zemen, A. Prokes, M. Rupp, A. F. Molisch, in Proc. of the 12th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). Measured delay and Doppler profiles of overtaking vehicles at 60 GHz (IEEELondon, 2018), pp. 1–5.
 79
M. Lerch, E. Zöchmann, S. Caban, M. Rupp, in Proc. of European Wireless. Noise bounds in multicarrier mmWave Doppler measurements, (2017).
 80
R. Nissel, E. Zöchmann, M. Lerch, S. Caban, M. Rupp, in Proc. of IEEE International Microwave Symposium (IMS). Low latency MISO FBMCOQAM: It works for millimeter waves! (2017).
 81
M. Lerch, S. Caban, M. Mayer, M. Rupp, The Vienna MIMO testbed: Evaluation of future mobile communications techniques. Intel Technol. J.18(3), 58–69 (2014).
 82
S. Caban, A. DisslbacherFink, J. A. GarcíaNaya, M. Rupp, in Proc. of IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC). Synchronization of wireless radio testbed measurements (IEEEBinjiang, 2011), pp. 1–4.
 83
M. Laner, S. Caban, P. Svoboda, M. Rupp, in Proc. of IEEE Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement Control and Communication (ISPCS). Time synchronization performance of desktop computers (IEEEMunich, 2011), pp. 75–80.
 84
R. Haining, Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
 85
A. Khintchine, Korrelationstheorie der stationären stochastischen Prozesse. Math. Ann.109(1), 604–615 (1934).
 86
T. A. Ell, S. J. Sangwine, in Proc. of International Conference on Image Processing, 2. Hypercomplex WienerKhintchine theorem with application to color image correlation (IEEEVancouver, 2000), pp. 792–795.
 87
C. E. Moxey, S. J. Sangwine, T. A. Ell, Hypercomplex correlation techniques for vector images. IEEE Trans. Signal Process.51(7), 1941–1953 (2003).
 88
J. L. Hintze, R. D. Nelson, Violin plots: a box plotdensity trace synergism. Am. Stat.52(2), 181–184 (1998).
 89
J. Hoey, The twoway likelihood ratio (G) test and comparison to twoway Chi squared test. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.4881 (2012).
Acknowledgements
The financial support by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs and the National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development is gratefully acknowledged. The research has been cofinanced by the Czech Science Foundation, Project No. 1718675S “Future transceiver techniques for the society in motion”, and by the Czech Ministry of Education in the frame of the National Sustainability Program under grant LO1401. The authors would like to thank Ronald Brunner from Rohde & Schwarz Austria for his great support during the measurement campaign. The authors acknowledge the TU Wien University Library for financial support through its Open Access Funding Program.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
EZ conducted the measurements, fitted the data. EZ and SC were writing the article. CFM brought in the idea of hypothesis testing. SC, SP, and ML were codeveloping the measurement setups. SS was introducing the TWDP model to the group. MR was connecting the dots between previous tworay model contributions and TWDP fading. All authors were proofreading and reviewing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Erich Zöchmann.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Zöchmann, E., Caban, S., Mecklenbräuker, C.F. et al. Better than Rician: modelling millimetre wave channels as twowave with diffuse power. J Wireless Com Network 2019, 21 (2019) doi:10.1186/s1363801813366
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Millimetre wave
 60 GHz
 Measurements
 Fading
 Hypothesis testing
 Rician fading
 TWDP fading