 Research Article
 Open Access
 Published:
SuperOrthogonal Block Codes with Multichannel Equalisation and OFDM in Frequency Selective Fading
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking volume 2010, Article number: 153846 (2010)
Abstract
Superorthogonal block codes in spacetime domain (i.e., Superorthogonal spacetime trellis codes (SOSTTCs)) were initially designed for frequency nonselective (FNS) channels but in frequency selective (FS) channels these superorthogonal block codes suffer performance degradation due to signal interference. To combat the effects of signal interference caused by the frequency selectivity of the fading channel, the authors employ two methods in this paper, namely, multichannel equalization (ME) and orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM). In spite of the increase complexity of the SOSTTCME optimum receiver design scheme, the SOSTTCME scheme maintains the same diversity advantage as compared to the SOSTTC scheme in FNS channel. In OFDM environments, the authors consider two forms of the superorthogonal block codes, namely, superorthogonal spacetime trelliscoded OFDM and superorthogonal spacefrequency trelliscoded OFDM. The simulation results reveal that superorthogonal spacefrequency trelliscoded OFDM outperforms superorthogonal spacetime trelliscoded OFDM under various channel delay spreads.
1. Introduction
The use of channel codes in combination with multiple transmit antennas achieves diversity, but the drawback is loss in bandwidth efficiency. Diversity can be achieved without any sacrifice in bandwidth efficiency, if the channel codes are specifically designed for multiple transmit antennas. Spacetime coding is a bandwidth and power efficient method of communication over fading channels. It combines, in its design, channel coding, modulation, transmit diversity, and receive diversity. Spacetime codes provide better performance compared to an uncoded system. Some basic spacetime coding techniques include layered spacetime codes [1], spacetime trellis codes (STTCs) [2, 3], spacetime block codes (STBCs) [4, 5], and superorthogonal spacetime trellis codes (SOSTTCs) [6, 7]. SOSTTCs are a new class of spacetime codes that combine set partitioning and a super set of orthogonalblock codes in a systematic way, in order to provide full diversity and improved coding gain when compared with earlier spacetime trellis constructions [2–5]. SOSTTCs, in a frequency nonselective (FNS) fading channel, do not only provide a scheme that has an improvement in coding gain when compared with earlier constructions, but they also solve the problem of systematic design for any rate and number of states. The superorthogonal block code transmission matrix used in the design of SOSTTCs is given in [6] as
For an Phase Shift Keying (PSK) modulation with constellation signal represented by , one can pick , where. In this case, the resulting transmitted signals of (1) are also members of the PSK constellation alphabet and thus no expansion of the constellation signals is required. Since the transmitted signals are from a PSK constellation, the peaktoaverage power ratio of the transmitted signals is equal to one. The choice of that can be used in (1) for both Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK) and Quaternary Phase Shift Keying (QPSK) is given as , and , , , respectively.
It should be noted that when , (1) becomes the code presented in [4] (i.e., Alamouti code). The construction of SOSTTCs is based on the expansion of a superorthogonal block code transmission matrix using a unique method of set partitioning [8]. In [6], the set partitioning method applied to SOSTTCs is explained. These set partitioning methods maximize coding gain without sacrificing data rates.
However, the performance of superorthogonal block code in spacetime domain is based on two fundamental assumptions with regard to the fading channel, which are given as follows:

(i)
frequency nonselective channel, that is, the channel does not have multipath interference;

(ii)
the fading coefficients from each transmit antenna to any receive antenna are independently identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables—this assumption is valid if the antennas are located far apart from each other (at least separation between antennas).
The first assumption may not be guaranteed in outdoor settings where delay spreads are significantly large (i.e., occurrence of multipath) due to the frequency selectivity of the fading channel. Multipath interference can severely degrade the performance of spacetime codes. Spacetime codes typically suffer from an irreducible errorfloor, both in terms of the frame errorrate and in terms of the biterror rate [9]. The two main approaches that can be used to enhance the performance of spacetime codes in frequency selective fading channels are the following:

(i)
orthogonal frequency division multiplexing, that is, multipathinduced intersymbol interference is reduced by converting the FS fading channel into parallel flat fading subchannels,

(ii)
employing maximum likelihood sequence estimation with multichannel equalization.
In [10], a multichannel equalizer with maximum likelihood sequence estimation was proposed to mitigate the effect of intersymbol interference for STTC in a multipath environment. Optimum receiver design was proposed for the STTC in the multipath environment. The number of states of the optimum receiver for the STTC in a multipath fading channel with L rays was given in [10] as , where S is the original state number of the STTC. Alternatively, OFDM can also be used to mitigate the effects of intersymbol interference for spacetime codes in multipath fading channels [11, 12]. In [12], the performance of space time trelliscoded OFDM was discussed and compared with Reed Solomon coded OFDM. The scheme in [12] is capable of providing reliable transmission at relatively low SNRs for a variety of power delay profiles, making it a robust solution. In [11], spacetime trelliscoded OFDM systems, with no interleavers, over quasistatic FS fading channels were also considered. The performance of the code was analyzed under various channel conditions in terms of the coding gain. The work in [11] points out that the minimum determinant of the spacetimecoded OFDM system increases with the maximum tap delay of the channel, thereby increasing coding gain.
The main contributions of this paper are as follows.

(i)
Multichannel equaliser was applied to the superorthogonal block code in spacetime domain and an optimum receiver design was proposed for the code.

(ii)
Coding in OFDM environment of the superorthogonal block code in spacefrequency domain was proposed.

(iii)
The performance comparison of using both ME and OFDM to mitigate the effects of signal interference for superorthogonal block code in a multipath environment was presented.
The paper is organised as follows. Section 2 presents the system model for superorthogonal block code in spacetime domain designed for frequency nonselective fading channels. Section 3 presents the two main approaches (i.e., ME and OFDM) to mitigate the effects of intersymbol interference for superorthogonal block codes in FS fading channels. Simulation results are presented in Section 4 and finally conclusions are drawn in Section 5.
2. System Model
A communication system equipped with antennas at the transmitter and antennas at the receiver is considered. The transmitter employs a concatenated coding scheme where a MultipleTrellisCoded Modulation (MTCM) encoder with multiplicity of is used as an outer code and an superorthogonal block code is used as the inner code. The transmitter encodes information bits into symbols (i.e., in matrix dimension) corresponding to the edge in the trellis of the spacetime code with states, where is the memory of the spacetime encoder. The encoded symbols are divided into streams, where each stream is linearly modulated and simultaneously transmitted via each antenna using the superorthogonal block transmission matrix in (1). The rate of this spacetime code is defined as bits /symbol. For example, let us consider a transmitter that encodes 4 information bits into 4 symbols, that is, and . This makes bits/symbol which is the rate for a QPSK constellation. This shows that the transmission scheme employed is a full rate system. The transmission trellises for the twostate and fourstate superorthogonal block code in spacetime domain (i.e., SOSTTC) scheme are given in Figure 1, which consist of eight parallel transitions per branch and are transmission matrices of the form given in (1) ) where
3. SuperOrthogonal BlockCoded Schemes in FS Fading Channels
3.1. Multichannel Equalization with SOSTTC
To combat the distortive channel effects caused by frequency selectivity of fading channel in a multipleinput multipleoutput (MIMO) scheme, a multichannel equalization is needed. The purpose of the equalisation is to reduce the distortive channel effects as much as possible by maximising the probability of correct decision being made at the receiver. Figure 2 shows the block diagram of a superorthogonal block coding scheme with multichannel equalisation.
Various equalisation techniques for MIMO schemes that is STBC have been proposed [13, 14]. The solution for multipath interference of STBC as stated in [13] assumes that the spacetime coding is done over two large blocks of data symbols instead of just two symbols as in the original proposed scheme (i.e., [4]). At the receiver of the scheme proposed in [13] there is an increase in complexity due to the doubled frontend convolution of the overall system. In [14], a generalisation was proposed for the space time block code structure in [13]. The paper derived a receiver that consists of a frequency domain space time detector followed by a predictive decision feedback equaliser. In this paper, by assuming that the multipath interference of the superorthogonal block code scheme in FS fading channels is over every twosymbol block as proposed in Asokan and Arslan [15] for [4], the authors design a new equalised trellis for the superorthogonal block code in spacetime domain at the receiver.
Based on the above assumptions and that the , the received samples over the t th coded superorthogonal block transmission can be arranged in matrix form as
where L is the number of channel taps and the channel response stands for the channel tap at time from transmit to the receive antenna. From (3), one can write as
The noise terms in (3) are independent identically distributed complex zero mean Gaussian samples, each with variance of per dimension. It is assumed that the channel coefficients are Rayleigh distributed.
At the receiver, a resultant trellis (i.e., equalised trellis) that will take the multipath interference into account is needed for maximum likelihood decoding. As an example of the resultant trellis for the superorthogonal block codes, the authors consider a scheme with only two rays in each subchannel and the multipath interference that spans two consecutive symbols. The numbers of states in the receiver structures for the twostate and fourstate QPSK superorthogonal block coding system increase to four and eight, respectively. The number of transition paths increases to 64 parallel paths. The resultant code trellis for the receiver structure is given in Figure 3.
The trellises in Figure 3 represent the multichannel equalised decoding trellis for the twostate and the fourstate superorthogonal block coding system in an FS fading channel with multipath interference that spans a twosymbol block. The transition per state contains 64 parallel paths of signal sets. In the trellises represent the delayed version of twosymbol blocks, affected by the second tap and represent the twosymbol block affected by the first tap (our analysis assumes ). By deduction the number of states in the received trellis, when the multipath interference spans twosymbol blocks with rays, is given by , where is the original number of states of the superorthogonal block code in spacetime domain.
3.2. SuperOrthogonal Block Codes for OFDM
The OFDM technique transforms an FS fading channel into parallel flat fading subchannels and eliminates the signal interference caused by multipaths. OFDM can be implemented using inverse fast Fourier transform/fast Fourier transformbased multicarrier modulation and demodulation. The block diagram of a superorthogonal block transmission in an OFDM environment is shown in Figure 4.
In this paper the authors consider two transmit diversity techniques that are possible for codedOFDM schemes. These are the following

(i)
SpaceTimeCoded OFDM Schemes. These schemes are capable of realizing both spatial and Temporal diversity gains in MIMO fading channels [12].

(ii)
SpaceFrequencyCoded OFDM schemes. These schemes are capable of realizing both spatial and Frequency diversity gain in multipath MIMO fading channels.
The time domain channel impulse representation between the i th transmit antenna and the j th receive antenna can be modeled as an Ltapped delay line. The channel response at time with delay can be expressed as
where is the Kronecker delta function, L denotes the number of nonzero taps, is the complex amplitude of the nonzero tap with delay of , is an integer, and is the tone spacing of the OFDM system. In (5) ) is modeled by the widesense stationary narrowband complex Gaussian processes with power , which is normalized as.
For an OFDM system with proper cyclic prefix, the channel frequency response is expressed as
where consist of the channel vectors and is the FFT coefficients. The time index will be ignored in the rest of our analysis since the analysis is done for one OFDM frame.
Using the superorthogonal block code transmission matrix given in (1) and assuming that the channel frequency response is constant for consecutive symbol intervals, the scheme becomes an SOSTTCOFDM scheme [16] (the received expression is given in (7)). Also we propose a case where the superorthogonal block code takes advantage of the spatial and frequency diversity possible in the coded OFDM scheme by assuming that the channel frequency response is identical across the adjacent subcarrier; the scheme becomes superorthogonal spacefrequency trelliscodedOFDM (SOSFTCOFDM) scheme (i.e., (8)). The received signal at the j th received antenna for an SOSTTCOFDM scheme and on the n th subcarrier is given as follows:
while the received signal at the j th received antenna for the SOSFTCOFDM scheme and on the subcarrier is given as
where consist of channel frequency response vectors from the i th transmit antenna to the j th receive antenna for the n th subcarrier and consists of the noise component at the receive antenna j and subcarrier n. The noise components are independently identical complex Gaussian random variables with zeromean and variance per dimension. The superorthogonal block codes for the two transmit antennas in (8) are written:
The superorthogonal block codes in spacetime domain under FNS fading channel are designed by maximising the pairwise error probability (PEP), which is done by maximising the minimum rank of the codeword sequence matrix (equivalent to the diversity order) and the minimum determinant codeword sequence matrix (equivalent to the coding gain). Also to enumerate the design criteria of the SOSFTCOFDM scheme, the authors consider the PEP of the scheme. To evaluate the PEP of an SOSFTCOFDM scheme, that is, the probability of choosing the codeword is , where , when in fact the codeword , where was transmitted, the maximum likelihood metric corresponding to the correct and the incorrect path will be used. The metric corresponding to the correct path and the incorrect path is given in (10):
The realisation of the PEP over the entire frame length and for a given channel frequency response is given in (11):
Simplifying (10) and substituting it in (11) gives (12):
where , is the block codeword matrix that characterise the SOSFTCOFDM system, and stands for the norm of the matrix element. The expression of is given in (13):
The conditional PEP given in (12) can be expressed in terms of the Gaussian function [17] as
The function is a diagonal matrix of the form shown in (15), represents the conjugate transpose of the matrix element, and stands for the symbol SNR:
The diagonal element of (15) and further expansion of are given in (16) and (17):
The conditional PEP in (14) can now be written as (18) using the expanded form of the matrix (i.e., (17)) and the expression of given in (16):
The function is defined by
and by using the inequality , , the PEP given in (18) can be upper bounded as
The PEP given in (20) can be averaged over all possible channel realisation as
The above expression (21) can be simplified further using the results in [18]. For a complex circularly distributed Gaussian random row vector with mean and covariance matrix , and a Hermitian matrix , we have
where is an identity matrix. Applying (22) in solving (21), (23) is obtained. Knowing that , (It should be noted that since is a diagonal matrix, is a Hermitian matrix, i.e., has Rayleigh distribution), and
At high SNR , the identity matrix at the denominator of (23) may be ignored and PEP upper bound averaged over all possible channel realisations is derived as follows:
where is the rank of matrix and are the set of nonzero eigenvalues of matrix . From (24), the design criteria for an SOSFTCOFDM scheme under the assumption of asymptotically high SNRs should be based on the rank and eigenvalue criterion. The rank criterion optimises the diversity of the SOSFTCOFDM scheme while the eigenvalue criterion optimises the coding gain of the SOSFTCOFDM scheme. The rank criterion is to maximise the minimum rank of for any codeword and , and the eigenvalue criterion is to maximise the minimum product of the nonzero eigenvalues of . As a comparison of both SOSTTCOFDM and SOSFTCOFDM systems we use a 16state trellis (given in Figure 5) designed in [16] that maximises the spacefrequency diversity and coding gain and minimises the number of parallel path for the SOSTTCOFDM scheme. The QPSK symbols 0, 1, 2, and 3 correspond to the QPSK signal constellations and the value of the rotation angle is denoted by 0 and .
4. Performance Results
Simulation results are shown to demonstrate the frame error rate (FER) performance of superorthogonal blockcoded schemes in both OFDM and multichannel equalisation environments. The wireless channels with two transmit antennas and one receive antenna are assumed to be quasistatic frequency selective Rayleigh fading channels with an average power of unity. The total power of the transmitted coded symbol was normalized to unity and the authors assumed an equalpower, twopath channel impulse response (CIR). The maximum Doppler frequency was 200 Hz. The entire multipath channel undergoes independent Rayleigh fading and the receiver is assumed to have perfect knowledge of the channel state information. The superorthogonal block coding schemes with OFDM (i.e., SOSTTCOFDM and SOSFTCOFDM) are assumed to have a bandwidth of 1 MHz and 128 OFDM subcarriers (i.e., for SOSTTCOFDM, the frame length equals 512 bits while for SOSFTCOFDM, the frame length equals 256 bits), and with multichannel equalisation, the system is assumed to have 512 bits per frame (QPSK modulation assumed for all simulations). Cyclix prefixes that are equal to or greater than the delay spread of the channel are used for the OFDMbased schemes, to eliminate intersymbol interference.
Figures 6 and 7 show FER of twostate and fourstate superorthogonal block coding schemes in both FS and FNS fading channels when both OFDM and ME are employed for the FS fading channel scenario. From Figures 6 and 7 we can see that the twostate and fourstate superorthogonal block coding schemes with ME in FS channels achieve the same diversity order (i.e., slope of the error rate curve) compared with the scheme in the FNS fading scenario, although the scheme suffers some coding gain loss. The simulation results in Figures 6 and 7 also show that, in an FS channel, both the twostate and fourstate SOSFTCOFDM schemes outperform the twostate and fourstate SOSTTCOFDM schemes. However, the SOSTTC system in an FNS channel outperforms them all. The performance degradation in Figures 6 and 7 for the SOSTTC with ME in an FS fading channel can be attributed to the increase in parallel path transitions per state of the scheme. If one assumes that all the 64 transitions per branch in the decoding trellis (i.e., Figure 3) are equally likely to be decoded, the probability of correctly decoding a transmitter codeword per state is equal to while the probability of decoding a transmitted codeword in the scheme under the FNS fading assumption is . Hence the probability of decoding the transmitted codewords correctly is greater in the FNS fading case compared to the FS fading case. Although there is an increase in the number of decoder trellis states for superorthogonal block coding scheme with ME in FS channels, compared with SOSTTC in an FNS channel, the overall probability of decoding correctly is still lower. This accounts for the performance loss obtained in terms of the coding advantage (i.e., shift in the error curve upward). The same argument goes for the fourstate scenario in Figure 7. It should be noted that neither the twostate nor the fourstate SOSTTCOFDM schemes in FS channels are optimum, as the presence of parallel transitions degrades the code performance in the FS fading environment. This is due to the fact that they do not exploit the diversity order possible in such scenarios which is why the twostate SOSTTC in a FNS channel outperforms both of them. In Figures 8 and 9, the FER performance of, respectively, the sixteenstate superorthogonal block coding OFDM schemes (i.e., SOSTTCOFDM and SOSFTCOFDM systems) sixteenstate STTCOFDM and STBC OFDM schemes (i.e. SFBC and STBC OFDM systems) for s and s delay spreads between the two paths is shown. In both graphs the superorthogonal spacefrequency trelliscoded OFDM outperforms superorthogonal spacetime trellis coded OFDM under the twochannel delay spread scenario. It should be noted from Figure 10 that, for coded SOSFTCOFDM schemes, a higher delay spread results in better performance.
5. Conclusion
The paper shows the performance of superorthogonal block coding schemes in fading channels, that is, FS and FNS fading channels. The receiver structure of an SOSTTC in an FS channel is given so that multichannel equalisation is used to mitigate the effects of multipath interference. New decoding trellises for twostate and fourstate coding schemes are designed. The formula for the number of states of the SOSTTC in FS channels with ME equalisation was deduced as a function of the number of divergent paths per state, the multipath rays, and the original number of states of the superorthogonal block coding scheme. The simulation results proved that although the code was designed for flat fading channels, it provides at least the same diversity advantage when applied to FS Rayleigh fading channels.
To demonstrate the performance of the superorthogonal block coding schemes in OFDM environment (i.e, SOSTTCOFDM, SOSFTCOFDM) and the STTCOFDM, trellises are used that have no parallel paths between transitions. FER performance shows that the SOSFTCOFDM scheme outperforms the SOSTTCOFDM scheme, the STBCOFDM scheme, and the STTCOFDM scheme for both s and s delay spread scenarios. The results also show that an increase in coding gain is obtained when there is an increase in the delay spread of the channel.
References
 1.
Foschini GJ: Layered spacetime architecture for wireless communication in a fading environment when using multielement antennas. Bell Labs Technical Journal 1996, 1(2):4159.
 2.
Tarokh V, Seshadri N, Calderbank AR: Spacetime codes for high data rate wireless communication: performance criterion and code construction. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1998, 44(2):744765. 10.1109/18.661517
 3.
Bäro S, Bauch G, Hansmann A: Improved codes for spacetime trelliscoded modulation. IEEE Communications Letters 2000, 4(1):2022. 10.1109/4234.823537
 4.
Alamouti SM: Spacetime block coding: a simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 1998, 16(8):14511458. 10.1109/49.730453
 5.
Tarokh V, Jafarkhani H, Calderbank AR: Spacetime block codes from orthogonal designs. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1999, 45(5):14561467. 10.1109/18.771146
 6.
Jafarkhani H, Seshadri N: Superorthogonal spacetime trellis codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 2003, 49(4):937950. 10.1109/TIT.2003.809607
 7.
Bale M, Laska B, Dunwell D, Chan F, Jafarkhani H: Computer design of superorthogonal spacetime trellis codes. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2007, 6(2):463467.
 8.
Ungerboeck G: Channel coding with multilevel/phase signals. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1982, 28(1):5567. 10.1109/TIT.1982.1056454
 9.
Gong Y, Letaief KB: Performance evaluation and analysis of spacetime coding in unequalized multipath fading links. IEEE Transactions on Communications 2000, 48(11):17781782. 10.1109/26.886466
 10.
Luo P, Guan Y: Optimum receiver for spacetime trellis code in multipath fading channel. Proceedings of the International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communication, February 2002 431435.
 11.
Hong Y, Dong ZY: Performance analysis of spacetime trellis coded OFDM system. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 2006, 2(2):5965.
 12.
Agrawal D: Spacetime coded OFDM for high datarate wireless communication over wideband channels. Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '98), May 1998, Ontario, Canada 3: 22322236.
 13.
Mudulodu S, Paulraj A: A transmit diversity scheme for frequency selective fading channels. Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM '00), June 2000, San Francisco, Calif, USA 2: 10891093.
 14.
Amis K, Le Roux D: Predictive decision feedback equalization for space time block codes with orthogonality in frequency domain. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC '05), September 2005, Berlin, Germany 2: 11401144.
 15.
Asokan R, Arslan H: Detection of STBC signal in frequency selective fading channels. Proceedings of the World Wireless Congress, May 2003, San Francisco, Calif, USA
 16.
Aksoy K, Aygölü Ü: Superorthogonal spacetimefrequency trellis coded OFDM. IET Communications 2007, 1(3):317324. 10.1049/ietcom:20060094
 17.
Simon MK, Jafarkhani H: Performance evaluation of superorthogonal spacetime trellis codes using a moment generating functionbased approach. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2003, 51(11):27392751. 10.1109/TSP.2003.818227
 18.
Turin G: The characteristic function of Hermetian quadratic forms in complex normal random variables. Biometrika 1960, 199201.
Author information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Sokoya, O., Maharaj, B.T. SuperOrthogonal Block Codes with Multichannel Equalisation and OFDM in Frequency Selective Fading. J Wireless Com Network 2010, 153846 (2010) doi:10.1155/2010/153846
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex
 Fading Channel
 Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex System
 Delay Spread
 Frequency Selective