 Research
 Open Access
Design and implementation of real time wideband channel simulator
 Muhammad I Akram^{1}Email author and
 Asrar U Sheikh^{1}
https://doi.org/10.1186/168714992012359
© Akram and Sheikh; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 1 May 2012
Accepted: 25 October 2012
Published: 1 December 2012
Abstract
This paper describes the design and implementation of a DSP based real time wideband channel simulator. The simulator implementation uses a floating point (TMS320C6713) and a fixed point (TMS320C6416) DSPs.The simulator has 8 taps and baseband bandwidth of 20 MHz. It has flexibility to generate several channel models under varied environmental conditions. To validate the functionality of the simulator, the baseband data is applied to the simulator input and its output is statistically analyzed and the results are compared with those predicted analytically.
Keywords
 Baseband
 Channel models
 Fixed point
 Floating point
 Simulator
1 Introduction
Wireless communications are inherently unreliable due to their time varying nature, multipath propagations and presence of interference signals from other users. In the presence of these impairments, substantially higher power must be transmitted to overcome these impairments inorder to acheive acceptable symbol error rate in any kind of radio channel. To design reliable and efficient wireless systems, it is essential to understand the behavior of radio channels in different environments.
Statistical channel modeling plays a vital role in the design of reliable wireless communication system. Channel modeling is the first step towards the efficient wireless system design. The purpose of channel modeling is to compute and estimate the various first and higher order statistical parameters of the fading channel. These parameters include Doppler spread, the time constants of fading, average fade duration, level crossing rates, amplitude probability distribution functions and the coherence bandwidth. For this purpose, measurements have been taken in different environment to characterize the channel.
Over the past few decades, a number of experiments have been performed to characterize mobile channels in urban, suburban, mountainous, wooded and highway environments[1–16]. On the basis of these measurements, several channel models have been proposed to explain the observed statistical nature of the fading channels between fixed base stations and mobile stations. These include short term fading models like the wellknown Rayleigh, Rice[17], Hoyt[18], Nakagamim[19] and Weibull[20] and for longer term lognormal model has been used[6, 21].
To evaluate the design and performance of a communication system, it is desirable to evaluate it in realistic situations. The experiments can be performed directly in a vehicle, driving through different environments. However, this is a timeconsuming and expensive task and it requires the presence of measurement equipments with proper calibrations. Moreover, the field trials can be affected by unintended uncontrollable circumstances. The inexpensive and flexible option is to use a real time channel emulator and measure the performance in a laboratory environments as in[22–24]. The commercially available channel emulators available may not offer the user enough flexibility when configuring the wireless channel parameters to test the system under different environmental conditions. Such simulators do not cover V2V scenarios under different channel models like Hoyt, Rice Hoyt etc. A low cost channel simulator is therefore required that models different scenarios and at the same time provide the user flexibility to measure the performance of the wireless transceiver under environmental conditions.
Over the past few decades, efforts have resulted in several designs and implementation of real time simulators. Early efforts were based on analog components[25–28]. The development of real time simulator starts in 1973 when[25] developed the first Rayleigh based channel simulator. The simulator used Zener diode to generate Gaussian random variable. But with the advent of digital computers, microcontrollers, fast Analog to Digital Converters (ADCs) and Digital to Analog Converters (DACs), the analog components were replaced by digital thereby increasing the reliability and flexibility of simulators. Comroe et el[29] first used discrete digital logic in its simulator. With the development of High Speed Digital Signal Processors (DSPs), the DSP based simulators were developed. Goubran et al[30] used 16 bit fixed point DSP for implementation and simulated the Gaussian quadrature components along with the lognormally distributed Line of Sight (LOS) component. Turkmani et al[31] used TMS320 E15 DSP chip for the development of a narrowband simulator. Cullen et al[32] reported a frequency selective simulator using TMS32050 DSP and IMSA110 integrated circuits. It had a baseband bandwidth of 10 MHz and maximum Doppler frequency of 100 Hz. Chen et al[33] used TMS320C31 DSP to design a frequency selective simulator. Salkintzis et al[34] developed 6 taps wideband channel simulator having maximum signal bandwidth of 20 MHz. It used two 32 bit DSP floating point processors. Papenfuss et al[35] used a hybrid DSP FPGA architecture to build a wideband channel simulator. It was capable of simulating 12 delay taps and had a baseband bandwidth of 5 MHz. Satellite Channel simulator has been developed in[36] using TMS320C6701 DSP platform. Kominakis et al[37] developed a narrowband fast and accurate simulator. Khars et al[38] developed a 5 MHz 12 taps wideband simulator using 12 DSPs (1 for each tap) for the generation of complex coefficients. A narrowband DSP based channel simulator has also been developed in[39]. Over the last decade, the use of Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) in DSP applications has become quite common. The FPGA based simulators have also been developed and their implementations have been described in[40–45].
One important application of wireless communication is Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) communications where both the transmitter and receiver are in motion. The V2V communication finds its applications in mobile adhoc wireless networks, intelligent highway systems, emergency, military and security vehicles. The implementation of V2V communications enhances road safety due to reduction in the number of accidents, improvement in highway traffic flow efficiency and real time data sharing without involving the cellular network which leads to efficient fuel consumption and reduced travel time. The statistical model for vehicle to vehicle communication was first proposed by Akki and Haber[46] and its statistical properties reported in[47]. This model covers Rayleigh distribution only with both inphase and quadrature components having identical variances. Matolak et al[48] after performing measurements in five different cities, models the channel as Weibull fading channel. Based on the work of[47], many V2V simulators have been designed and implemented. Cox et al[49] presented a discrete line spectrum based approach to simulate the channel. The work in[50] was based on sum of sinusoids (SOS) approach for simulator design. The simulator proposed in[51] is based on KullbackLeibler divergence which is compared with IFFT based approach of simulator design. Borries et al[52] used Gaussian quadrature rules for simulator design. Zaji et al[53] proposed an efficient sum of sinusoids (SOS) based approach for V2V simulator design. All the simulator design approaches mentioned above are restricted to V2V Rayleigh fading channel only.
The simulators mentioned above may be classified into three categories. The first category uses the sum of sinusoid (SoS) approach for generating the fading channel coefficients. This approach has the drawback of multiple Sine function calls which makes it computationally expensive to implement in real time. Secondly this kind of simulator does not produce the channel with the statistical properties that match with the theoretical values. Another class of simulators uses IFFT based approach to generate the required channel coefficients. This approach is computationally efficient. The drawback is that it works on a block of data and can not be used for the streaming data in real time. The approach used in this paper, is the Filter based approach. This is computationally efficient as well as produces channel coefficients having more accurate statistical properties.
The proposed simulator is a modified form of the simulator described in[37]. The proposed simulator uses a generalized Wideband Nakagami Hoyt with diffused line of sight channel model for Vehicle to Vehicle communication[54] environment to generate real time fading data. It covers Rayleigh, Rice, RiceHoyt, Lognormal and static channels as its special cases. The multipaths have been modeled as Tap Delay Line (TDL) filter. Efficient implementation of optimal TDL filter has been performed over the TMS320C6416 DSP processor. The novel simulator implementation uses two DSP (TMS320C6713 and TMS320C6416) boards along with one wide bandwidth (Microline ORS114) I/O daughter board. To the best of authors’ knowledge, to date such real time simulator has not been proposed and implemented.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 1 presents the brief overview of the proposed Diffused NakagamiHoyt V2V channel model. Section 1 describes the channel simulator design philosophy and architecture. Section 1 shows the outcome of the simulator and their comparison with the analytical expressions. Finally, Section 1 concludes the paper.
2 Brief channel model description
In V2V communications, the received signal consists of direct (LOS) and indirect (NLOS) component. The direct component may or may not be present depending on the presence or absence of obstacles between the transmitter and the receiver. The direct component may be further divided into a clear LOS between the receiver and the transmitter or a diffused LOS. The value of diffused LOS is negligible when the buildings are of steel or reinforced concrete but they must be considered for the wooden and bricks building. In rural areas, most of the building are made of wooden or bricks wall hence while modeling the channel, the diffused LOS component must be considered[55]. In V2V communications as mentioned by[56, 57], when the antennas are inside the car, the shadowing must be considered due to the presence of roof top surface.
Youssef et al[16] established after taking the measurements in the rural environment that the channel is more accurately modeled only when the variances of Inphase and Quadrature components are different. The argument was further supported by[58] where the model matches the measured data for the cases of unequal variances. For V2V communication,[57] explained the case when the distance between the vehicles exceeds 70100 m, the Nakagami mfactor is observed to be less than unity, which corresponds to the case of unequal variances of the Gaussian quadrature components. Further as found from the V2V measurements (antennas inside car) results in 5 GHz frequency band[48, 59], the m value of each tap of the channel model described is found to be less than unity (0.750.89) which from[16] corresponds to the value of q (0.50.707).
It considers, the lognormally distributed diffused LOS component ρ(t) = A e^{z(t)} and a NLOS component having Hoyt distributed amplitude envelop μ(t) = μ_{1}(t) + j μ_{2}(t) under the assumptions that both transmitter and receiver are in motion. μ_{1}(t), μ_{2}(t) and z(t) are the real Gaussian random processes with zero mean and variances${\sigma}_{1}^{2}$,${\sigma}_{2}^{2}$ and${\sigma}_{3}^{2}$ respectively and A is the direct LOS component.$q=\frac{{\sigma}_{1}}{{\sigma}_{2}}$ and V_{2} and V_{1} are the velocities of transmitter and receiver respectively and$a=\frac{{V}_{2}}{{V}_{1}}$.
where, J_{0}(.) is the zeroorder Bessel function.$q=\frac{{\sigma}_{1}}{{\sigma}_{2}}$, V_{2} and V_{1} are the velocities of transmitter and receiver respectively,$K=\frac{2\Pi}{\lambda}$ and f_{m 3} is the LOS component maximum Doppler.
where K(.) is the elliptical integral function of first kind,$a=\frac{{V}_{2}}{{V}_{1}}$, f_{m 1}, f_{m 2}are the maximum Doppler shifts due to the motion of the receiver and transmitter respectively with${f}_{\mathit{\text{mi}}}=\frac{{V}_{i}}{\lambda}$. Therefore, f_{m 2}= a f_{m 1}.
3 Simulator description
3.1 Design philosophy
In efficient real time systems design all the available system resources are efficiently utilized in order to minimize the cost and maximize the productivity. For the data acquisitioning at high data rate, the DSPs can not be interfaced directly with high speed ADCs and DACs because of its I/O bandwidth limitations. The best solution is to use FPGA for this purpose. Therefore, Microline ORS114 daughter board was used for this purpose. The board consists of a vertex2 FPGA, multiple channel ADC and DAC, FIFO memory and control circuitry used to synchronize the data input output events with DSP. The board is mounted over the peripheral expansion of TMS320C6416 fixed point DSP Starter Kit (DSK) which performs the TDL filtering. Since filtering operation needs to be performed at high data rate, for this purpose an optimal TDL filter need to be implemented. This can be done over fixed point processor of high clock rate. Hence for that purpose TMS320C6416 processor with 1 GHz clock have been selected. The channel coefficient generation depends upon the time variations of the scatterers surrounding the transmitter and receiver. These variations are normally much slower as compared to the baseband data rate. Therefore for the channel generation purpose a processor with lower clock rate is adequate and a TMS320C6713 32 bit floating point processor is employed. The purpose of floating point processor is to generate the channel coefficients accurately with high precisions.
3.2 Simulator design specification
Figure1 shows the overall block diagram of the channel simulator. It consists of two DSKs communicating with each other using Multiple Channel Buffered Serial Port 0 (MCBSP0). The TMS320C6713 DSK board acts as a Master device. It generates and transmits channel coefficients to the primary TMS320C6416 DSK board which acts as a slave. The system runs according to the following specification:

TMS320C6416T DSK board having 1 GHz fixed point processor works as a primary board to accept the baseband input and generate output;

TMS320C6713 DSK board having 225 MHz floating point processor works as a secondary board that will generate channel taps at the required rate;

Input Baseband data bandwidth 20 MHz (10 MHz each I & Q);

Maximum number of Taps (channel coefficients) generated N = 8;

Maximum Doppler frequency that can be set = 480 Hz;

ADC and DAC Buffer size = 1024 Elements (16I + 16Q)= 32 bits;

ADC and DAC resolution = 14 bits;

Maximum sampling rate of ADC and DAC = 25 MHz;

Transfer rate of channel coefficients = 16 kHz (2 kHz per tap);

Maximum excess delay = 1024 samples which on 25 MHz sampling frequency becomes 41 μ sec.
3.3 Simulator functionality
The simulator performs the following tasks.
3.3.1 Baseband data acquisition
The daughter board is configured to use 2 channels ADC and DAC working at 25 MSPS each and transferring 14 bit data in and out of DSP. The data transfer is done using Enhanced Direct memory Access (EDMA) interface configured with optimal External memory Interface (EMIF) setting to read and write data. The pin configuration detail is given in[60].
Ping Pong buffering technique described in TI documentations at[61] has been used to perform data transfer efficiently between the I/O devices and Internal Memory (SRAM) of DSP. EDMA engine performs the data transfer between the ping/pong buffers and I/O device alternately and a pingpong flag ensures that the DSP is processing the buffer that is not being overwritten by the EDMA. Since EDMA runs independently from the CPU, the CPU can continue to process the block of data that is in the ping buffer while the EDMA is writing data on the pong buffers and vice versa. In order to remain synchronous with EDMA and void the data loss, it is essential for CPU to finish the processing before the next EDMA interrupt is generated. This Hardware interrupt is generated every time the EDMA completes data transfer.
Timing diagram
Time Line →  0  NT _{ s }  2NT_{ s }  3NT_{ s } 

EDMA Transfer  ADC→PING IN  PONG OUT→DAC  ADC→PONG IN  PING OUT→DAC 
DSP Processes  IDLE  PING BUFF  IDLE  PONG BUFF 
3.3.2 Primary secondary board interface
After connecting the two DSPs together the next step is to configure the ports so that the data can be transmitted and received successfully. The ports are configured by the setting the appropriate values of the four serial port registers. They are Receive Control Register (RCR), Transmit Control Register (XCR), Sample Rate Generator Register (SRGR), Pin Control Register (PCR).
The details of how to set these registers are given in TI documentation[62]. The values are set so that one frame consisting of 8 channel coefficients (each of 32 bits) is transmitted in 500 μ sec that results in a transmission rate of 16 kHz per coefficient.
Again, EDMA along with ping pong buffering technique is used to perform this transfer efficiently. At the transmitting end, the EDMA interrupt is generated periodically and at the same time, the CPU generates new channel coefficients. Whereas, at the receiving end, when a complete frame is received an interrupt is generated and the channel coefficients are updated.
3.3.3 Tap delay line filtering
where y[n], x[n], h[n] are samples of the output, input and filter coefficient respectively at nth sample instant of a digital system of order M.
As seen from (6), in order to obtain an output y[n] in real time, a buffer of M previous values (delay line) need to be maintained along with the current sample. Typically, a pointer is set up at the beginning of the sample array (oldest sample) and then manipulated to access the consecutive values.
Whenever a new sample needs to be added to the delay line all the values need to be shifted down. For large values of M (delay line), this will cause additional overhead of shifting the large amount of data. The alternate approach is to overwrite the oldest value. This can be implemented by using circular mode for pointer access.
Using the pipelining approach mentioned in[64] the code has been optimized for N = 8 taps. The inner loop was completely unrolled to reduce the loop overhead, the dependency graph was created and the instructions were pipelined to reduce the number of cycles. The optimized code consists of 3 parts. The prolog, the mainloop and epilog.
The prolog consists of initialization of local variables, pushing registers over stack for usage inside the function, loading taps coefficients h[n] from memory into registers and defining input buffer as circular. Defining the input as circular buffer removes the overhead of an additional branch instruction inside the loop. The use of circular buffer prevents the constant test of wrapping. The prolog is to be executed once for L size input buffer. It takes 45 cycles to execute this code.
Four taps TDL resources allocation for main loop
FU  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 

Cy  
.M1  MPY I4  MPYH I1  MPY I1  MPYH I2  MPY I2  MPYH I3  MPY I3  MPYH I4 
.M2  MPYHL Q4  MPYLH Q1  MPYHL Q1  MPYLH Q2  MPYHL Q2  MPYLH Q3  MPYHL Q3  MPYLH Q4 
.L1  SUB I3  ADD I3  SUB I4  ADD I4  SUB I1  ADD I1  SUB I2  ADD I2 
.L2  ADD Q3  ADD Q3  ADD Q4  ADD Q4  ADD Q1  ADD Q1  ADD Q2  ADD Q2 
.S1  ADD  B  ZERO  SHR  ADD  
.S2  ZERO  SHR  ADD  
.D1  LDW  LDW  LDW  LDW  STH  
.D2  SUB  STH 
The epilog consists of the remaining part of the function. This include remaining loop portion, popping data back to the registers and branch out of the function. This part takes 42 cycles to execute.
3.3.4 Channel gains generations
The channel coefficients have been generated using a floating point TMS320C6713 DSP. Kominakis et al[37] describes the efficient method of generating the channel gains. It uses Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) Doppler filter along with the polyphase interpolator for the generation of correlated Gaussian channel coefficients. The original approach was for flat fading Rayleigh channel only. It was modified for the more generalized 8 taps frequency selective Nakagamiq (Hoyt) mobile to mobile fading channel with diffused LOS.
Various channel models for simulation
A= 0  A≠ 0  

z(t) = 0  z(t) ⇒ Gaussian  
q = 1  Rayleigh  Rice  LogNormal Rice 
0 < q < 1  Hoyt  Rice Hoyt  Diffused Hoyt 
σ_{2} = 0    Static  Lognormal 
The Doppler Shaping Filter is implemented as an IIR Filter having the frequency response$\sqrt{S\left(f\right)}$ obtained by taking the Square root of (5). The filter has been designed for the Doppler rate of f_{ d }T_{ s }= 0. 2. The higher rate is achieved by interpolating the channel coefficients I times using polyphase interpolator. For the Fade Rate (f_{ d }T_{ s }) of 0.01, the value of I = 20 is taken. For the maximum Doppler frequency of 160 Hz the channel sampling rate is set to 16 kHz.
The maximum Doppler frequency is configurable and is set using LCD Keypad interfacing of TMS320C6713 DSK (MCBSP1 port). This can go up to 480 Hz. For a single emulator run, it will remain unchanged. The filter coefficients are computed on the base of normalized Doppler frequency. The algorithm for filter coefficient generation uses fade rate (f_{ d }T_{ s }) of 0.01. For 160Hz Doppler the Sampling frequency (Filter coefficient update rate is 16 KHz). This means if the Doppler frequency is increased the sampling frequency will also be increased in the same proportion so as to make the fade rate constant. The increase in sampling frequency means MCBSP0 port data rate will be increased. This rate is software configurable and can be set by changing the value of Sample Rate Generator Register (SRGR) of the MCBSP0 port. The upper limit depends upon the complexity of the Channel coefficient generation algorithm and number of taps. For 8 taps, it is 480 Hz and this can be increased if we further optimize the channel generation code using some optimization techniques (reducing mathematical complexity and efficient use of DSP resources).
4 Results and comparison
Most V2V systems operate in frequency range 55.9 GHz[57]. Bwang et el[65] and Matolak et el[66] used 5.15 and 5.2 GHz carrier frequencies to simulate the V2V channel. Hence, the simulation was run with the following parameters, carrier frequency f_{ c }= 5. 8GHz, velocity of receiver V_{1} = 30km/hr which means f_{m1} = 160Hz, LOS component A = 0 for Hoyt model, three different values of q = 1,0. 5,0. 3 and three different values of a = 0,0. 5,1.
MSE of various quantities for a = 0.5
q  Envelope PDF  Phase PDF  BPSK BER  LCR 

0. 3  4. 240×10^{−5}  4. 647×10^{−5}  1. 456×10^{−7}  13×10^{−4} 
0. 5  8. 148×10^{−5}  3. 371×10^{−5}  4. 439×10^{−7}  6×10^{−4} 
1. 0  6. 511×10^{−5}  2. 586×10^{−5}  0. 775×10^{−7}  11×10^{−4} 
The proposed simulator is also compared with the one described in[67]. There is a significant difference between the philosophies of the two simulators. The simulator described in[67] requiring measured impulse response, generates channel coefficients from the measured channel transfer function. These channel coefficients operate on the information data to deliver performance in terms of error rate. This simulator essentially requires in field measurements. The proposed simulator does not require measured infield data but uses the statistical models available in published standards, thus saving significantly on the cost of expensive field trials. The proposed simulator operates on the statistical parameters to generate real time channel coefficients, which then operate on the information data to generate performance in terms of error rates. The developed simulator can be used to operate on the infield channel data provided we augment this simulator with a facility to convert the stored channel data into channel coefficients or channel statistics. It should be borne in mind that our interest has been to replace field environment by laboratory environment and by various options on choices of channel character.
5 Conclusion
In this paper, design and implementation of an efficient real time wideband simulator has been discussed. The simulator was run in real time with a known input and the output data was analyzed. The TDL filter has been optimally implemented over TMS320C6416 DSP. The output of the filter has been verified by comparing the simulator output with MATLAB. The pipelined architecture of the processor and the circular buffer have been efficiently utilized. The channel coefficients have been generated and analyzed. The BPSK modulated data has been input and the output has been stored. The bit error rate has been measured and compared with the theoretical data to verify the validity of the channel simulator.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) through the Science and Technology Unit at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) for funding this work through project No. NSTP08ELEC424 as part of the National Science, Technology and Innovation Plan (NSTIP).
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Bullington K: Radio propagation variations at VHF and UHF. Proc. IRE 1950, 32: 2732.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Egli JJ: Radio propagation above 40 MHz over irregular terrain. Proc. IRE 1957, 45(10):13831391.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Jakes WC, Reudink DO: Comparison of mobile radio transmission at UHF and X band. Vehicular Technol. IEEE Trans 1967, 16: 1014.Google Scholar
 Trifonov PM, Buelko VN, Zotov VS: Structure of USW field strength spatial fluctuations in a city. Trans. Telecomm. Radio Eng 1964, 9: 2630.Google Scholar
 Okamura Y, Kol YA: Field strength and its variability in VHF and UHF landmobile radio service. Rev. Elec. Comm. Lab 1968, 910: 825873.Google Scholar
 Turin GL, Clapp FD, Johnston TL, Fine SB, Lavry D: A statistical model of urban multipath propagation. IEEE Trans. Veh Technol 1972, 21: 19.Google Scholar
 Black DM, Reudink DO: Some characteristics of mobile radio propagation at 836 MHz in the Philadelphia area. Vehicular Technol. IEEE Trans 1972, 21: 4551.Google Scholar
 Cox D: Delay Doppler characteristics of multipath propagation at 910 MHz in a suburban mobile radio environment. Antennas Propagation. IEEE Trans 1972, 20: 625635. 10.1109/TAP.1972.1140277View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Cox D: Time and frequencydomain characterizations of multipath propagation at 910 MHz in a suburban mobileradio environment. Radio Sci 1972, 7: 10691077. 10.1029/RS007i012p01069View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Aulin T: Characteristics of a digital mobile radio channel. Rev. Elec. Comm. Lab 1981, 30: 4553.Google Scholar
 Seidel SY, Rappaport TS: 914 MHz path loss prediction models for wireless communications in multifloored buildings. Rev. Elec. Comm. Lab 1992, 40: 207217.Google Scholar
 Hawbaker DA, Rappaport TS: Indoor wideband radiowave propagation measurements at 1.3 GHz and 4.0 GHz. IEE Electron. Lett 1990, 26: 18001802. 10.1049/el:19901153View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Dersch U, Troger J, Zollinger E: Multiple reflections of radio waves in a corridor. IEEE Trans Antenna Propagation 1994, 42: 15711574.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Babich F, Lombardi G: Statistical analysis and characterization of the indoor propagation channel. Rev Elec Comm Lab 2000, 48: 455464.Google Scholar
 Zhao X, Kivinen J, Vainikainen P, Skog K: Propagation characteristics for wideband outdoor mobile communications at 5.3 GHz. IEEE J Selected Areas Commun 2002, 20: 507514. 10.1109/49.995509View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Youssef N, Wang CX, Patzold M: A study on the second order statistics of NakagamiHoyt mobile fading channels. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol 2005, 54: 12591265. 10.1109/TVT.2005.851353View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Rice SO: Statistical properties of a sine wave plus random noise. Bell Syst J 1948, 27: 109157.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Hoyt RS: Probability functions for the modulus and angle of the normal complex variate. Bell Syst J 1947, 26: 318359.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Nakagami M: The mdistribution  A General Formula of Intensity Distribution of Rapid Fading. Permagon Press, Oxford; 1960.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Taneda MA, Takada J, Araki K: A new approach to fading. In IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications. Weibull model; 1999:711715.Google Scholar
 Hansen F, Meno FI: Mobile fadingRayleigh and lognormal superimposed. IEEE Trans. Veh Technol 1977, 36: 332335.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Mangharam R, Meyers J, Rajkumar R, Stancil D: A multihop mobile networking testbed for telematics. In Proceedings of Society for Automotive Engineers (SAE) World Congress. Detroit, USA; 2005.Google Scholar
 Dulmage J, Tsai M, Fitz M, Daneshrad B: COTSbased DSRC testbed for rapid algorithm development, implementation, and test. In Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation & characterization. WINTECH ’06, New York, USA; 2006.Google Scholar
 Fernandez TM, Garcya JA, Gonzalez ML, Castedo L: FlexVehd: a flexible test bed for vehicular radio interfaces. In Proceedings of 8th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications, 2008. ITST 2008. Hilton Phuket, Thailand; 2008:283287.Google Scholar
 Gaston AA, Chriss WH: A Multipath fading simulator for mobile radio. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technol. 1973, 22: 241244.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Fitting RC, Trans Widebandtroposcatterradiochannelsimulator: IEEE Commun. Technol. 1975, 15: 565570.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Ball JR: A realtime fading simulator for mobile radio. Radio Electron. Eng 1982, 52: 475478. 10.1049/ree.1982.0069View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Lecours M, Marceau F: Design and implementation of channel simulator for wideband mobile radio transmission. In Proc. Vehicular Technol. Conf. (VTC) 1989, 2: 652655.Google Scholar
 Comroe RA, Marceau F: Alldigital fading simulator. In Proc. Nut. Electron Conf 1978, 32: 136139.Google Scholar
 Goubran RA, Hafez HM, Sheikh AUH: Realtime programmable land mobile channel simulator. Vehicular Technol. Conf., 1986 36th IEEE 1986, 36: 215218.Google Scholar
 An JF, Turkmani AMD, Parson JD: Implementation of a DSPbased frequency nonselective fading simulator. Fifth Int. Conf. Radio Receivers Assoc. Syst 1990, 2024.Google Scholar
 Cullen PJ, Fannin PC, Garvey A: Realtime simulation of randomly timevariant linear systems: the mobile radio channel. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas 1994, 43: 583591. 10.1109/19.310172View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Chen XF, Chung KS: Generation of noise sources for a digital frequency selective fading simulator. Int. Symp. Signal Process. Appl., ISSPA 1996, 2: 463466.Google Scholar
 Salkintzis AK: Implementation of a digital wideband mobile channel simulator. Broadcasting. IEEE Trans 1999, 45: 122128.Google Scholar
 Papenfuss JR, Wickert MA: Implementation of a realtime, frequency selective, RF channel simulator using a hybrid DSPFPGA architecture. IEEE Radio Wireless Conf., 2000 2000, 49: 135138.Google Scholar
 Fischer S, Seeger R, Kammeyer KD: Implementation of a realtime satellite channel simulator for laboratory and teaching purposes. The Third European DSP Education & Research Conference 2000. [http://www.ti.com/europe/docs/univ/docs/info.htm] []Google Scholar
 Komninakis C, Fast A: Telecommunications, accurate rayleigh fading simulator. Global Conf., 2003. GLOBECOM ’03. IEEE 2003, 6: 33063310.Google Scholar
 Khars M, Zimmer C: Digital signal processing in a real time propagation simulator. IEEE Trans. Instrum Meas 2006, 55: 197205. 10.1109/TIM.2005.861491View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kandeepan S, Jayalath ADS: Narrowband channel simulator based on statistical models implemented on Texas instruments C6713 DSP and national instruments PCIE6259 hardware. In Proceedings of International Conference on Communication Systems, 2006. ICCS 2006. 10th IEEE Singapore. (Singapore; 2006:16.Google Scholar
 Ghazel A, Boutillon E, Danger JL, Gulak G, Laamari H: Design and performance analysis of a high speed AWGN communication channel emulator. IEEE Pac. Rim Conf. Commun., Comput. Signal Process 2001, 1: 374375.Google Scholar
 Sattar F, Mufti M, Stancil DD, Steenkiste P: VLSI architecture of Rayleigh fading simulator based on IIR filter and polyphase interpolator. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Microelectronics, 2004. ICM 2004. (Tunisia; 2004:291294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Picol S, Zaharia G, Zein GE: Towards the development of a hardware simulator for MIMO radio channels. ignals. Circuits Syst. 2005. ISSCS 2005. Int. Symp. 2005, 2005, 1: 115118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Picol S, Zaharia G, Zein GE, Houzet: Hardware simulator for MIMO Radio channels: design and features of the digital block. In Proceedings of IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2008. VTC 2008Fall. (Alberta; 2008:15.Google Scholar
 Carames F, GonzalezLopez M, Castedo L: FPGAbased vehicular channel emulator for evaluation of IEEE 802.11p transceivers. In 9th International Conference on Intelligent Transport Systems Telecommunications, (ITST). (Lille, France; 2009:592597.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Borries KC, Judd G, Stancil DD, Steenkiste P: FPGABased channel simulator for a wireless network emulator. IEEE Vehicular Technol Conf 2009, 15.Google Scholar
 Akki AS, Haber F: A statistical model for mobiletomobile land communication channel. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol 1986, 35: 27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Akki AS: Statistical properties of mobiletomobile land communication channels. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf 1994, 43: 826831. 10.1109/25.330143View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Matolak DW, Sen I, Wenhui X, Yaskoff NT: 5 GHZ wireless channel characterization for vehicle to vehicle communications. Mil. Commun. Conf 2005, 5: 30163022.Google Scholar
 Wang R, Cox D: Channel modeling for adhoc mobile wireless networks. Proc IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf 2002, 1: 2125.Google Scholar
 Patel CS, Stuber GL, Pratt TG: Simulation of Rayleigh faded mobiletomobile comimunication channels. Vehicular Technol. Conf. 2003. VTC 2003Fall. 2003 IEEE 58th 2003, 1: 163167.Google Scholar
 Petrolino A, Gomes J, Tavares G: A MobiletoMobile Fading Channel Simulator Based on an Orthogonal Expansion. In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2008. VTC Spring 2008, Marina Bay, Singapore; 2008:366370.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Borries KC, Stancil DD: Effcient Simulation of MobileToMobile Rayleigh Fading using Gaussian Quadrature. In IEEE 65th, Vehicular Technology Conference, 2007. VTC2007Spring. (Dublin, Ireland; 2006:534538.Google Scholar
 Zaji AG, Stuber GL: A new simulation model for mobiletomobile Rayleigh fading channels. Wireless Commun. Networking Conf., 2006. WCNC 2006. IEEE 2006, 3: 12661277.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Akram MI, Sheikh AU: Modeling Nakagami Hoyt mobile to mobile fading channel with diffused line of sight. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), 2012 IEEE. (Paris, France; 2012:398403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Akki AS: Modeling and characterization of land mobile communication. PhD thesis. Uniersrsity of Pennsilvenia, Department of Electrical Engineering, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States; 1977.Google Scholar
 Mecklenbrauker CF, Molisch AF, Karedal J, Tufvesson F, Paier A, Bernado L, Zemen T, Klemp O, Czink N: Vehicular channel characterization and its implications for wireless system design and performance. Proc. IEEE 2011, 99: 11891212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Molisch A, Tufvesson F, Karedal J, Mecklenbrauker C: A survey on vehicletovehicle propagation channels. Wireless Commun., IEEE 2009, 16: 1222.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Papazafeiropoulos AK, Kotsopoulos SA: An extended generalized rice model for wireless communications. Vehicular Technol. IEEE Trans 2010, 59: 26042609.Google Scholar
 Matolak DW, Sen I, Xiong W: Channel modeling for V2V communications. In Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems Workshops, 2006. 3rd Annual International Conference. (San Jose, California; 2006:17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Documentation package of ORS114 Wide bandwidth Microline Analog peripheral card Version 1.0 2005Google Scholar
 Texas Instrument web site [http:www.ti.com] []
 SPRA455A: Using the TMS320C6000 MCBSP as a High Speed Communication Port. Texas Instruments. 2001.Google Scholar
 SPRA645A: Circular Buffering on TMS320C6000. Texas Instruments. 2001.Google Scholar
 SPRU198G: TMS320C6000 Programmer’s Guide. Texas Instruments. 2002.Google Scholar
 Wang B, Sen I, Matolak DW: Performance evaluation of 802.16e in vehicle to vehicle channels. In IEEE 66th, Baltimore, Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC2007 Fall. MD, USA; 2007:14061410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Sen I, Matolak DW: V2V Channels and performance of multiuser spread spectrum modulation. Proc. IEEE 1st Intx’l. Symp, Wireless Vehic. Commun 2007, 2: 1925.Google Scholar
 Khokhar K, Salous S: Frequency domain simulator for mobile radio channels and for IEEE 802.162004 standard using measured channels. Commun, IET 2008, 2: 869877. 10.1049/ietcom:20070385View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.