- Open Access
Amplify-forward relaying for multiple-antenna multiple relay networks under individual power constraint at each relay
© Izi and Falahati; licensee Springer. 2012
- Received: 27 May 2011
- Accepted: 17 February 2012
- Published: 17 February 2012
This article considers the design of an optimal beamforming weight matrix of multiple-antenna multiple-relay networks. It is assumed that each relay utilizes the amplify and forward strategy, i.e., it multiplies the received signal vector by a matrix, dubbed the relay weight matrix, and forwards the resulting vector to the destination. Furthermore, we assume that the source and the destination have the same number of antennas and that each transmit antenna is virtually paired to a different destination antenna. The relay weight matrices are concurrently designed to optimize the mean square error (MSE) criterion at the destination, assuming each relay node is subject to a power constraint. Accordingly, it is demonstrated that this problem can be cast as a convex optimization problem in which the individual power constraints are tackled by employing the method of Lagrange multipliers in two stages. First, the relay gain matrix is computed analytically in terms of Lagrange dual variables, thereby converting the original problem into a scalar optimization problem. Then, these scalar variables are computed numerically. The proposed scheme is evaluated through simulation with various numbers of relays and antennas to obtain MSE and bit error rate (BER) metrics and it is shown that the resulting MSE and BER achieved through using the proposed method outperforms that of MMSE-MMSE method introduced by Oyman et.al., which is regarded as the best known method for the underlying problem.
- co-operative communication
- multiple-antenna multiple-relay networks
- convex optimization
- amplify and forward relaying
It is well established that in most cases relaying techniques provide considerable advantages over direct transmission, provided that the source and relay cooperate efficiently. The choice of relay function is especially important as it directly affects the potential capacity benefits of node cooperation [1–5]. In this regard, two relaying methods, amplify-forward (AF) [6, 7] and estimate-forward [8, 9], are extensively addressed in the literature. As the names imply, the former just amplifies the received signal but the latter estimates the signal with errors and then forwards it to the destination.
It has been shown that increasing the number of relays has the advantage of increasing the diversity gain and flexibility of the network; however, it renders some new issues to arise . For instance, the relaying algorithm and power allocation across relays should be addressed is such cases. Relay selection [11, 12] and power allocation [13, 14] are two well-known methods when dealing with the power management issues.
The capacity and reliability of the relay channel can be further improved by using multiple antennas at each node. The use of relays together with using multiple antennas has made it a versatile technique to be used in emerging wireless technologies [15–20]. Relaying strategies for the multi-antenna multiple-relay (MAMR) networks is more challenging than single-antenna networks, since in addition to scaling and phase operations, matrix operations should also employed at the relays.
AF MIMO relay systems have drawn considerable attention in the literature due to their simplicity and ease of implementation. In this regard, a plethora of works are devoted to finding a proper relaying strategy for AF MAMR networks. In , the idea of linear distributed multi-antenna relay beamforming is introduced where each relay performs a linear reception and transmission in addition to output power normalization. In this article, K single antenna transmitted independent data streams to their respected single antenna receivers. The linear operations suggested in this article are matched filter, zero forcing, and minimum mean square error (MMSE). They are briefly called MF-MF, ZF-ZF, and MMSE-MMSE schemes, respectively. In , a method based on QR decomposition is suggested which works better than the ZF-ZF scheme. Combinations of various schemes are also considered in . For example in ZF-QR scheme, relays perform ZF algorithm in reception and QR algorithm (channel triangulation) in transmission.
In , the so-called incremental cooperative beamforming is introduced and it is shown that it can achieve the network capacity in the asymptotic case of large K with a gap no more than O(1/log(K)). However, this method is not suited when few relays are incorporated since this method only works properly when the number of relays tends to infinity.
In , a wireless sensor network that is composed of some multi-antenna sensors aimed to transmit a noisy measurement vector parameter to the fusion centre is formulated as a MAMR network. Moreover, it is assumed that the second hop associated with the resulting MAMR network has a diagonal channel matrix and the destination noise is small enough to be ignored. The current manuscript is actually an extension of  since neither the channel matrices need to be diagonal nor the destination noise is restricted to be zero.
In , it is shown that an MAMR network with single-antenna source and destination can be transformed to a single-antenna multiple relay (SAMR) network by performing maximal ratio combining at reception and transmission for each relay nodes. This enables the network beamforming introduced in  to be readily employed.
In , the relay gain matrices are obtained by maximizing the MSE at destination restricting the received power at the destination. In , a linear relaying scheme for an MAMR network fulfilling the target SNRs on different independent substreams transmitted from each source antennas is proposed and the power-efficient relaying strategy is derived in closed form. In , a nearly optimal relaying scheme is proposed to maximize the mutual information between the source and the destination under total relay power constraint.
In this article, the problem of MAMR network with multiple antennas at source and destination with individual relays power constraints is formulated as a convex optimization problem. The optimum relay gain matrices are obtained by solving the optimization problem using Lagrange dual variables method. This relays gain matrices are obtained in terms of K scalar variables where K is the number of relays. Then those variables are computed numerically. As noted before, the articles that investigate this configuration either suggest the relay gain matrix heuristically or concern another constraint such as a limited power constraint at the destination, the destination quality of service or the sum power of relays. In our opinion, the limited power for each relay is a more realistic assumption, because each relay in the network has its own power supply and unused power for each relay cannot be used by other relays. In the same manner as [26–29], complete CSI is considered to be available for optimum relay design. The optimization can be performed at the destination, and then the processing results are fed back to the relays. Although the closed form formula is not obtained but a parametric relation form of the relay gain matrices are derived. These parameters can be calculated either numerically or heuristically. A simpler form of the relay gain matrices is derived for the two relay case. The initial works on this issue are first addressed in  while the optimal solution is not fully treated there.
It is assumed that the i th relay has N i antennas. Hence, the transmission occurs in two hops. During the first hop, the transmitter broadcasts the desired signal to the relays. Then, throughout the second hop, each relay applies a weight matrix to the received signal vector and retransmits it to the destination.
where G i is the M × N i channel gain matrix between the i th relay and the destination whose entries are complex and assumed to be known completely at the destination. Also, n is an M × 1 zero-mean noise vector whose entries are of power Finally, n i for i = 1,2,..., K and n are assumed to be statistically independent.
Furthermore, as it is noted earlier, a scalar operation is merely done at each destination. In other words, the weight matrices W i for i = 1,2,..., K are computed so that the received vector y is a scaled unbiased estimation of the transmitted vector x. Note that when sources and destinations are equipped with multiple antennas, joint precoder and reception matrices must be concurrently designed along with the relay matrices. However, this is a completely different problem which is out of the scope of the current work. It should be emphasised that since there is a correspondence between each source and its affiliated destination, the number of sources and destinations remains the same.
Then, by substituting (21) into (14) one can readily arrive at Lagrange dual problem , considering λ i for i = 1,...,K are non-negative values. Thus, maximizing the obtained dual object function yields the optimal values for the corresponding Lagrange coefficients. However, this dual problem is too complicated to differentiate, thus does not lead to an analytical solution. Hence, a numerical method, called the active set method , is employed to compute the Lagrange multipliers.
It is worth mentioning that the dual problem involves just K scalar variables, however, the primary problem contains K unknown matrices each of size N i × N i . Thus, relying on dual problem, results in a simplification which can be effectively addressed through using the aforementioned numerical method.
In , this is not solved but a value is suggested heuristically for the λ i and the output is then normalized to the transmitter output power. Here, such values are determined numerically.
Referring to the results, it can be observed that at each SNR point, there is an η in which the resulting BER is minimized. Moreover, results show that there is a close agreement between the optimum value of η from BER curves to that obtained from the estimated PDF for η. The obtained values are employed later in the simulation results provided in Section 6.
The material proposed in the previous sections can be summarized for system implementation as follows.
Channel estimation has to be performed primarily. The channel estimation for AF relaying is considered in related literatures [36, 37]. It is assumed that the estimation and transmission of channel matrices are error free. Assuming a slow fading channel, the first and second hop channels can be modeled as block fading channels and it can be assumed that it does not change during the block. The block can be a fraction of coherent time of the channel.
Thus, the algorithm at the boundary of each block is as follows.
Initialization: set λi to an arbitrary start value for i = 1,...,K,
If ∈ < ∈ 0 end,
else modify λ i for i = 1,...,K, goto iterate,
where ∈ 0 is a predetermined constant value that can be chosen arbitrary according to specific design accuracy.
Modification of λ i in the last line of the algorithm is performed based on the Active Set method . In this method, during each step the gradient of the cost function is estimated using three points in the space. The MATLAB function "fmincon" can be used to implement this method.
To confirm the superiority of the proposed schemes over MMSE-MMSE and ZF-ZF method, their average BER and MSE are compared by varying the number of relay nodes, K, and the number of relay antennas N. It is also assumed that the input noise power at the destination and the relays are the same. The channel matrices are generated independently during subsequent iterations. It is further assumed that the first and the second hop channels for all relays are known perfectly. Networks with various numbers of nodes and antennas are simulated and the average BER and the MSE parameter are used as the performance metrics and they are compared with MMSE-MMSE and ZF-ZF methods. Independent un-coded QPSK modulated symbol streams are transmitted from each of the source antennas.
In these cases too, the simulation results reveal that the optimum scheme outperforms the other two methods. Furthermore, the complexity observed by the proposed optimum method although seems to be a bit higher than MMSE-MMSE scheme, but provides a solution that would reduce the power consumption by approximately 3 dB.
A relay network with multiple relay each having multiple antennas is considered. The relay matrices are found by solving an optimization problem. In this problem, the MSE at the destination is minimized and the individual relay output power considered as constraint. The Lagrange dual problem is then obtained to compute the Lagrange dual variables numerically. Solving Lagrange dual problem (22) is simpler than the primary problem (9). This is because, solving Lagrange dual problem requires the calculation of K scalar unknown variables but in primary problem case, K unknown N × N matrices needs to be computed. So, the dimension of the problem decreases N × N times.
Two numerical methods based upon SINR and BER are introduced to obtain the optimum value of η that is employed for the actual simulation of the proposed optimum scheme.
The system with the proposed optimum, MMSE-MMSE and ZF-ZF schemes, is simulated and the average BER as well as MSE at destination are obtained. The results show that the proposed optimum scheme outperforms MSE-MSE and ZF-ZF schemes by a good margin. Indeed, analytical computation of Lagrange dual variables and considering normalization parameter η as the optimization problem variable can be considered for future investigations.
Two relays network case
- Sendonaris A, Erkip E, Aazhang B: User cooperation diversity, Part I: system description. IEEE Trans Commun 2003, 51(11):1927-1938. 10.1109/TCOMM.2003.818096View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen D, Laneman JN: Modulation and demodulation for cooperative diversity in wireless systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2006, 5(7):1785-1794.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laneman JN, Tse DNC, Wornell GW: Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 2004, 50(12):3062-3080. 10.1109/TIT.2004.838089MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Kramer G, Gastpar M, Gupta P: Cooperative strategies and capacity theorems for relay networks. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 2005, 51(9):3037-3063. 10.1109/TIT.2005.853304MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Yazdi KA, El Gamal H, Schniter P: On the design of cooperative transmission schemes. Proceedings of 41st Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing Monticello, IL 2003, 1576-1585.Google Scholar
- Issariyakul T, Krishnamurthy V: Amplify-and-forward cooperative diversity wireless networks: model, analysis, and monotonicity properties. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 2009, 17(1):225-238.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nabar RU, Kneubuhler FW, Bölcskei H: Performance limits of amplify-and-forward based fading relay channels. Proceedings of IEEE Int Conf Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Montreal 2004, 4: 565-568.Google Scholar
- Abou-Faycal I, Médard M: Optimal uncoded regeneration for binary antipodal signalling. Proceedings of IEEE Int Conf on Communications, Paris, France 2004, 2: 742-746.Google Scholar
- Gomadam KS, Jafar SA: Optimal relay functionality for SNR maximization in memoryless relay networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2007, 25(2):390-401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xie L-L, Kumar PR: Multisource, multidestination, multirelay wireless networks. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 2007, 53(10):3586-3595.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Beres E, Adve R: On selection cooperation in distributed networks. In Proceedings of IEEE 40th Conf Info Sci and Sys. (CISS 2006), Princeton, NJ; 2006:1056-1061.Google Scholar
- Zhao Y, Adve R, Lim TJ: Improving amplify-and-forward relay networks: optimal power allocation versus selection. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2007, 6(8):3114-3123.Google Scholar
- Chen M, Serbetli S, Yener A: Distributed power allocation strategies for parallel relay networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2008, 7(2):552-561.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jing Y, Jafarkhani H: Network beamforming using relays with perfect channel information. In Proceedings of Int Conf Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing (ICASSP). Volume 3. Honolulu, HI; 2007:473-476.Google Scholar
- Tang X, Hua Y: Optimal design of non-regenerative MIMO wireless relays. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2007, 6(6):1398-1407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang B, Zhang J, Host-Madsen A: On the capacity of MIMO relay channels. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 2005, 51(1):29-43.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Khoshnevis B, Yu W, Adve R: Grassmannian beamforming for MIMO amplify-and-forward relaying. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 2008, 2(8):1397-1407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fan Y, Thompson J, Adinoyi A, Yanikomeroglu H: Space diversity for multi-antenna multi-relay channels. Proceedings of Eur Wireless Conf 2006. Athens, April2–52006Google Scholar
- Fan Y, Thompson J: MIMO Configurations for relay channels: theory and practice. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2007, 6(5):1774-1786.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fan Y, Adinoyi A, Thompson JS, Yanikomeroglu H: Antenna combining for multi-antenna multi-relay channels. Eur Trans Telecommun 2007, 18(6):617-626. 10.1002/ett.1231View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oyman Ö, Paulraj AJ: Power-bandwidth tradeoff in dense multiantenna relay networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2007, 6(6):2282-2293.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shi H, Abe T, Asai T, Yoshino H: Relaying schemes using matrix triangularization for MIMO wireless networks. IEEE Trans Commun 2007, 55(9):1683-1688.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gharan SO, Bayesteh A, Khandani AK: Asymptotic analysis of amplify and forward relaying in a parallel MIMO relay network. In Proceedings of 45th Annual Allerton Conf on Comm., Control, and Computing. Monticello, IL; 2007:89-95.Google Scholar
- Xiao J, Cui S, Luo Z-Q, Goldsmith AJ: Linear coherent decentralized estimation. IEEE Tran Signal Process 2008, 56(2):757-770.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Izi YA, Falahati A: On the cooperation and power allocation schemes for multiple-antenna multiple-relay networks. In Proceedings of Int Conf Wireless and Mobile Commun (ICWMC). Cannes/La Bocca, French; 2009:44-48.Google Scholar
- Falahati A, Izi YA: Power allocation for zero forcing scheme in multiple antenna multiple relay networks. In Proceedings of 5th international symposium on telecommunications (IST2010). Tehran, Iran; 2010:297-301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Behbahani AS, Merched R, Eltawil AM: Optimizations of a MIMO relay network. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2008, 56(10):5062-5073.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guan W, Luo H, Chen W: Linear relaying scheme for MIMO relay system with QoS requirements. IEEE Signal Process Lett 2008, 15: 697-700.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fu Y, Yang L, Zhu W-P: A nearly optimal amplify-and-forward relaying scheme for two-hop MIMO multi-relay networks. IEEE Commun Lett 2010, 14(3):229-231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Izi YA, Falahati A: AF relaying for multiple antenna multiple relay networks under individual power constraint at each relay. Proceeding of 3rd International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL) 2010, 1-5. Rome, 7-10 NovemberGoogle Scholar
- Khajehnouri N, Sayed AH: Distributed MMSE relay strategies for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2007, 55(7):3336-3348.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boyd SP, Vandenberghe L:Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2004. [http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd]View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Petersen KB, Petersen MS: The Matrix Cookbook. Technical University of Denmark, October 2008.[http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/views/edoc_download.php/3274/pdf/imm3274.pdf]
- Nocedal J, Wright S: Numerical Optimization. 2nd edition. Springer, New York; 2006. ISBN:0387303030MATHGoogle Scholar
- Joham M, Utschick W, Nossek J: Linear transmit processing in MIMO communications systems. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2005, 53(8):2700-2712.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao F, Cui T, Nallanathan A: On channel estimation and optimal training design for amplify and forward relay networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2008, 7: 1907-1916.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun S, Jing Y: Channel training and estimation in distributed space-time coded relay networks with multiple transmit/receive antennas. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC. Sydney, Australia; 2010:1-6.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.