- Open Access
Reliability analysis for a data flow in event-driven wireless sensor networks using a multiple sending transmission approach
© Wang et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
- Received: 12 August 2013
- Accepted: 23 October 2013
- Published: 5 December 2013
Reliability analysis is an important issue in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). This paper aims to study the reliability of a data flow in event-driven wireless sensor networks with multiple sending transmission approach without acknowledgments. Initially, an event-driven wireless sensor network model is described in terms of limited node battery energy and shadowed fading channels. Then, in order to analyze the network reliability, the wireless link reliability and the node energy availability are investigated, respectively. Furthermore, the analytical expressions of the instantaneous network reliability and the mean time to failure (MTTF) are derived. Finally, the simulation results validate the correctness and accuracy of the analytical results.
- Wireless sensor networks
- Network reliability
- Multiple sending
Recent advances in micro-electro-mechanical systems, digital electronics, and wireless communications have led to the emergence of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). A WSN consists of a number of wireless sensor nodes. Each sensor node is a device, equipped with multiple on-board sensing elements, wireless transmitter/receiver modules, computational and power supply elements. Usually, it is characterized by its small size and limited computational and communication capabilities with limited energy supplied by a battery. Indeed, they are deployed in an area of interest to collect data from the environment, process sensed data, and take action accordingly. Typical applications of the WSNs include battlefield surveillance, environmental monitoring, biological detection, smart spaces, and industrial diagnostics[3, 4]. Due to the superiority in monitoring spatial phenomena, the WSNs have drawn a lot of attention both in academia and industry.
In the past few years, intensive researches for WSNs have been conducted in many aspects, such as localization, synchronization[6, 7], deployment, and communication protocol. However, it should be emphasized that comparing with other wireless networks, WSNs are more prone to failure due to energy depletion, hardware failure, communication link errors, and so on. Obviously, how to measure the impacts from such network failure is one important issue for practical design and operations, which motivates the research on reliability analysis for WSNs.
So far, reliability analysis has been intensively studied in many traditional wireless communication networks. Chen and Lyu analyzed the end-to-end expected instantaneous reliability for wireless common object request broker architecture (CORBA) networks. Cook and Ramirez-Marquez analyzed the two-terminal reliability for mobile ad hoc networks. They[12, 13] also employed Monte Carlo (MC) simulation method to evaluate the reliability of mobile and cluster ad hoc networks, respectively. Dominiak et al. analyzed the terminal-pair (two-terminal) reliability for IEEE 802.16 mesh networks. Liu et al. proposed a more general region failure model to assess the reliability of wireless mesh networks affected from a region failure. Egeland and Engelstad analyzed the k-terminal reliability for both planned and random wireless mesh networks. However, due to the non-repairable nodes and the limited node battery energy in WSNs, the traditional reliability evaluation methods are not applicable for WSNs. It has actually been reported that the energy constraint is the main factor preventing the full exploitation of WSN technology. So far, only a few researches can be found for the reliability of WSNs in the open literature. AboElFotoh et al. proposed a reliability measure under the assumption that the transmitter/receiver ranges of all sensor nodes are all the same. Obviously, such assumption violates that fact that the real transmitter/receiver ranges usually change with practical wireless link conditions and traffic loads. Shazly et al. further proposed a three-state node reliability model for WSNs reliability analysis. Cheng et al. developed the predictability of collective timeliness for hard network lifetime environments through the worst-case energy consumption analysis. However, the proposed model cannot reflect the relation between the data transmissions and energy consumptions.
This paper will try to analyze the reliability of a data flow in event-driven WSNs with multiple sending transmission approach without acknowledgments. Considering the effects from wireless links, traffic loads, energy consumptions, and node failures, a more rigorous system model is described for a data flow in event-driven WSNs. Based on the proposed system model, wireless link reliability and node energy availability are analyzed respectively. Then, the instantaneous network reliability and the mean time to failure (MTTF) of the data flow in event-driven WSNs are derived.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. The system model is introduced in Section 2. In Section 3, the expressions of the node energy availability and the instantaneous network reliability and MTTF of event-driven wireless networks are derived. Numerical results are presented in Section 4 before conclusions are drawn in Section 5.
where k! is the factorial of k, and.
where is the transmit power of the n th relay node.
where γt is the target SNR.
In typical WSN applications, wireless sensor nodes are scattered in large geographical regions and it is not always possible to perform node maintenance after the network deployment. For this reason, all nodes have to adapt their behaviors to the environmental changes. This section will firstly analyze the wireless link reliability and the node energy availability, respectively. Then, the instantaneous network reliability and MTTF are evaluated for the data flow.
3.1 Wireless link reliability
where is the complentary error function.
3.2 Node energy availability
In the considered WSN, the sensor nodes are powered by low-voltage batteries. If the stored energy is depleted, the node is an energy-unavailable node and thus loses its functioning. Based on the energy stored in a node, the node energy availability for source node and relay nodes will be discussed in the following subsections.
3.2.1 Source node energy availability
where the function is the upper incomplete gamma function.
To reduce the computation complexity, we further analyze the probability in (19) and obtain Proposition 1.
Proof. See Appendix 1.
3.2.2 Relay node energy availability
where denotes the binomial coefficients, and.
where is the regularized incomplete beta function.
To reduce the computation complexity, we further analyze the probability in (25) and obtain Proposition 2.
Proof. See Appendix 3.
3.3 Instantaneous network reliability
In this section, both the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation results and theoretical results will be presented. Here, the accuracy of the derived expressions of wireless link reliability, the instantaneous network reliability, and MTTF will be verified, and the impacts of the number of relay nodes will be discussed.
Main simulation parameters
Intensity function for NHPP models
The initial energy of all nodes
Power required by sensing event per second
Power dissipation to run transmitter circuitry
Length of the linear region
2.5 × 105 bit/s
Power of background noise
4 × 10-14 W
Variance of shadow fading
Path loss exponent
LOS path loss at dref
Sensing the environment and sending the sensed information to a sink node are two primary jobs of a WSN. These jobs are required to be done with greater reliability because some major decisions depend on the information collected from WSNs. However, sensors are typically powered through batteries in WSNs and it has been reported that the energy constraint is the main factor preventing the full exploitation of WSN technology. So, reliability evaluation is a critical step for the design of the WSNs. Based on energy-based reliability model, this paper investigates the system performance in an event-driven wireless sensor network with a multiple sending approach without acknowledgments. A system model is established including sensor energy consumption model and the wireless link model. Then the wireless link reliability, node energy availability, instantaneous network, and MTTF are investigated in this paper. However, the node energy availability expression and the system instantaneous reliability expression are not in closed form, thereby making calculation cumbersome. To bypass this problem, two propositions are developed which make it possible to calculate the node energy availability and the system instantaneous reliability easier. The simulation results show that the analytical expressions are accurate enough. Furthermore, the results are useful in designing a WSN to obtain good network performance. For future work, the reliability analysis of a data flow in event-driven WSN with acknowledgment-based transmission scheme and the reliability evaluation of the WSNs with a random node distribution will be investigated.
Proof of proposition 1
Proposition 1 is proved.
Derivation of the probability distribution of random variable D n (t)
The probability distribution of random variable D n (t) will be deduced in this appendix.
Proof of proposition 2
Thus, Proposition 2 is proved.
This work is supported by National 863 High Technology Development Project (no. 2013AA013601), Key Special Project of National Science and Technology (no. 2013ZX03003006), National Nature Science Foundation of China (nos. 61372106, 61102068, 61172077, and 61223001), Research Fund of National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University (no. 2013A04), Program Sponsored for Scientific Innovation Research of College Graduate in Jiangsu Province (no. CXZZ13_0098), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (no. 20113218120017), and Open Research Fund of National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University (no. 2012D14).
- Akyildiz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E: A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag 2002, 40(8):102-114. 10.1109/MCOM.2002.1024422View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen MN, Bao C, Tew KL, Teddy S, Li XL: Ensemble based real-time adaptive classification system for intelligent sensing machine diagnostics. IEEE Trans. Reliability 2012, 61(2):303-313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Kao H, Ke J: Voronoi-based relay placement scheme for wireless sensor networks. IET Commun 2009, 3(4):530-538. 10.1049/iet-com.2008.0204View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li J, AlRegib G: Network lifetime maximization for estimation in multihop wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Process 2009, 57(7):2456-2466.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang N, Shen XL: Research on WSN nodes location technology in coal mine. In International Forum on Computer Science-Technology and Applications, vol. 3. IEEE, Chongqing, China; 2009:232-234.Google Scholar
- Bredin J, Demaine E, Hajiaghayi M, Rus D: Deploying sensor networks with guaranteed fault tolerance. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw 2010, 18(1):216-228.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun K, Ning P, Wang C: Fault-tolerant cluster-wise clock synchronization for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Dependable and Sec. Comput 2005, 2(3):177-189. 10.1109/TDSC.2005.36View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fontanelli D, Petri D: An algorithm for WSN clock synchronization: uncertainty and convergence rate trade off. In IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Measurement. IEEE, Bucharest; 2009:74-79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ho D, Shimamoto S: Highly reliable communication protocol for WSN-UAV system employing TDMA and PFS scheme. In IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops. IEEE, Houston; 2011:1320-1324.Google Scholar
- Chen X, Lyu M: Reliability analysis for various communication schemes in wireless CORBA. IEEE Trans. Reliability 2005, 54(2):232-242. 10.1109/TR.2005.847268View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cook JL, Ramirez-Marquez JE: Two-terminal reliability analyses for a mobile ad hoc wireless network. Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety 2007, 92(6):821-829. 10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cook JL, Ramirez-Marquez JE: Mobility and reliability modeling for a mobile ad hoc network. IIE Trans 2008, 41(1):23-31. 10.1080/07408170802322648View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cook JL, Ramirez-Marquez JE: Reliability analysis of cluster-based ad-hoc networks. Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety 2008, 93(10):1512-1522. 10.1016/j.ress.2007.09.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dominiak S, Bayer N, Habermann J, Rakocevic V, Xu B: Reliability analysis of IEEE 802.16 mesh networks. In 2nd IEEE/IFIP International Workshop on Broadband Convergence Networks. IEEE, Munich; 2007:1-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Jiang X, Nishiyama H Kato N: Reliability assessment for wireless mesh networks under probabilistic region failure model. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technol 2011, 60(5):2253-2264.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Egeland G, Engelstad P: The availability and reliability of wireless multi-hop networks with stochastic link failures. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun 2009, 27(7):1132-1146.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kurp T, Gao R, Sah S: An adaptive sampling scheme for improved energy utilization in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. IEEE, Austin; 2010:93-98.Google Scholar
- AboElFotoh H, ElMallah E, Hassanein H: On the reliability of wireless sensor networks. In IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 8. IEEE, Istanbul; 2006:3455-3460.Google Scholar
- Shazly M, Elmallah E, AboElFotoh H: A three-state node reliability model for sensor networks. In IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. IEEE, Miami; December 2010.Google Scholar
- Cheng BC, Yeh HH, Hsu PH: Schedulability analysis for hard network lifetime wireless sensor networks with high energy first clustering. IEEE Trans. Reliability 2011, 60(3):675-688.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wong HC, Nogueira JMS, Loureiro AAF: Fault management in event-driven wireless sensor networks. In the 7th ACM International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems. ACM, Venice; 2004:149-156.Google Scholar
- Shakya RK, Singh YN, Verma NK: Optimizing channel access for event-driven wireless sensor networks: analysis and enhancements. Arxiv preprint arXiv:1203.5874 (2012)Google Scholar
- Luo H, Tao H, Ma H, Das S: Data fusion with desired reliability in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Paral. Distributed Syst 2011, 22(3):501-513.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pham H: System Software Reliability. New York: Springer; 2006.Google Scholar
- Rappaport TS: Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1996.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Haight F: Handbook of the Poisson Distribution. New York: Wiley; 1967.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Benjamin A, Benjamin A, Quinn J: Proofs That Really Count: The Art of Combinatorial Proof. Washington: The Mathematical Association of America; 2003.MATHGoogle Scholar
- Binomial distribution(Wikipedia, 2013),http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution
- Beta function(Wikipedia, 2013),http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_function#Incomplete_beta_function
- Poisson distribution(Wikipedia, 2013),http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution#cite_note-Garwood1936--10
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.